我正在为Angular开发一个小的npm包,它基本上是一个指令,可以拖动/移动你放置它的元素。我确实设法在昨天发布它(甚至认为它花了一段时间,因为这是我第一次发布角度包到npm)。我使用ngc
来编译Angular的代码。汇总和汇总以进行缩小。
现在,我想解决我发现的一些错误。我修复了它们,运行了编译器,运行汇总等等。但汇总一直向我显示@angular/core
未定义,所以它将其视为外部依赖项 - 我遇到的问题是解决问题 - 我的两个文件this is undefined
中的ng build --prod --aot
。无论如何,模块已经构建,我能够发布它并使用它。问题是,当我尝试ERROR in Unexpected value
'DragOnlyModule in .../ng-dragonly-demo/node_modules/ng-dragonly/index.d.ts'
imported by the module
'AppModule in .../ng-dragonly-demo/src/app/app.module.ts'.
Please add a @NgModule annotation.
包含该软件包的应用程序时,它会大叫:
@angular/core
我猜这是因为我上面写的警告。所以我试着解决它们,但没有成功。我至少可以通过在exports: ['@angular/core']
文件中添加rollup.config.js
来修复this is undefined
警告,但import { NgModule } from "@angular/core";
import { DragOnlyDirective } from "./dragonly.directive";
var DragOnlyModule = (function () {
function DragOnlyModule() {
}
DragOnlyModule.decorators = [
{ type: NgModule, args: [{
declarations: [DragOnlyDirective],
exports: [DragOnlyDirective]
},] },
];
/** @nocollapse */
DragOnlyModule.ctorParameters = function () { return []; };
return DragOnlyModule;
}());
export { DragOnlyModule };
//# sourceMappingURL=dragonly.module.js.map
仍在那里。我也意识到我的编译文件与昨天的文件不同。
在少数提交之前编译文件等:
var __decorate = (this && this.__decorate) || function (decorators, target, key, desc) {
var c = arguments.length, r = c < 3 ? target : desc === null ? desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(target, key) : desc, d;
if (typeof Reflect === "object" && typeof Reflect.decorate === "function") r = Reflect.decorate(decorators, target, key, desc);
else for (var i = decorators.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) if (d = decorators[i]) r = (c < 3 ? d(r) : c > 3 ? d(target, key, r) : d(target, key)) || r;
return c > 3 && r && Object.defineProperty(target, key, r), r;
};
import { NgModule } from "@angular/core";
import { DragOnlyDirective } from "./dragonly.directive";
var DragOnlyModule = (function () {
function DragOnlyModule() {
}
DragOnlyModule = __decorate([
NgModule({
declarations: [DragOnlyDirective],
exports: [DragOnlyDirective]
})
], DragOnlyModule);
return DragOnlyModule;
}());
export { DragOnlyModule };
//# sourceMappingURL=dragonly.module.js.map
今天编译文件:
tsconfig.json
看起来装饰器的创建方式不同,如果我在node_modules/.bin/ngc -p tsconfig.json
文件或任何其他配置文件中更改了任何内容,我真的不知道。
我建立模块的步骤是:
node_modules/.bin/rollup -c
node_modules/.bin/uglify ... (that's a long one)
app
|
- src/
- dragonly.directive.ts
- dragonly.module.ts
- index.ts
- package.json
- tsconfig.json
- rollup.config.js
我的文件结构是:
dist/
...我正在将输出编译到应用程序根目录的{
...
"main": "dragonly.bundle.js",
"module": "dragonly.module.js",
"jsnext:main": "dragonly.module.js",
"types": "dragonly.module.d.ts",
...
"devDependencies": {
"@angular/compiler": "^4.3.3",
"@angular/compiler-cli": "^4.3.3",
"@angular/core": "^4.3.3",
"rollup": "^0.45.2",
"rollup-plugin-commonjs": "^8.1.0",
"rollup-plugin-node-resolve": "^3.0.0",
"typescript": "^2.4.2",
"uglify-js": "^3.0.27",
"uglifyjs": "^2.4.11"
},
"dependencies": {
"@angular/compiler-cli": "^4.3.3",
"@angular/platform-server": "^4.3.3"
}
}
目录中。
的package.json
{
"compilerOptions": {
"lib": [
"es2015",
"dom"
],
"rootDir": ".",
"baseUrl": ".",
"target": "es5",
"sourceMap": true,
"outDir": "./dist",
"module": "es2015",
"declaration": true,
"skipLibCheck": true,
"inlineSources": true,
"stripInternal": true,
"noImplicitAny": true,
"strictNullChecks": true,
"typeRoots": [
"./node_modules/@types/"
],
"moduleResolution": "node",
"emitDecoratorMetadata": true,
"experimentalDecorators": true,
"suppressImplicitAnyIndexErrors": true,
"paths": {
"@angular/core": ["node_modules/@angular/core"]
}
},
"files": [
"index.ts"
],
"angularCompilerOptions": {
"skipMetadataEmit": true }
}
tsconfig.json
export default {
entry: 'dist/index.js',
dest: 'dist/bundles/dragonly.umd.js',
sourceMap: false,
format: 'umd',
moduleName: 'ng.dragonly',
external: ['@angular/core'],
globals: {
'@angular/core': 'ng.core',
}
}
rollup.config.js
a*b
如果有人读到这一切,并知道可能导致问题的原因,我真的很感激。谢谢。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
问题是我在"skipTemplateCodegen": true
中遗漏了tsconfig.json
选项。
该文件的最终版本看起来像(tsconfig.json):
...
"angularCompilerOptions": {
"skipTemplateCodegen": true,
"skipMetadataEmit": true
}
这也是我的代码看起来不同的原因。