我有一些Express.js实例和一些我希望包含在某些函数中的路由。例如:
const wrapper = (route) => {
return (req, res, next) => {
let result = route(req, res, next);
// do some independent processing
}
};
app.get('/', wrapper((req, res, next) => {
// respond to request somehow
}));
虽然这很好用,但我不喜欢在每个路由或中间件上明确调用wrapper
的想法,这需要进行此类处理。
有没有办法能够在某个包装器中包装每个必需的路由/中间件(假设wrapper
函数可以检查这个路由/中间件需要被包装)隐式地(通过Express.js
扩展名,猴子修补或一些特殊的中间件)?
更新
更坚实的例子。我们假设我想制作async
路由器功能。但我不想在每个路线功能中发现错误。所以我把它们包起来:
const wrapper = func => (req, res, next) => {
const promise = func(req, res, next);
if (promise.catch) {
promise.catch(err => next(err));
}
next();
};
app.get('/one', wrapper(async (req, res, next) => {
// respond to request somehow
}));
app.get('/two', wrapper(async (req, res, next) => {
// respond to request somehow
}));
app.get('/three', wrapper(async (req, res, next) => {
// respond to request somehow
}));
// and so on...
app.use((err, req, res, next) => {
// do something with intercepted error
});
所有路线周围的显式wrapper
实际上是我想要摆脱的东西。
答案 0 :(得分:2)
事实证明它有点像PITA,因为最终,Express不会传播路由处理函数的返回值。
这就是我提出的(猴子补丁):
const Layer = require('express/lib/router/layer');
const handle_request = Layer.prototype.handle_request;
Layer.prototype.handle_request = function(req, res, next) {
if (! this.isWrapped && this.method) {
let handle = this.handle;
this.handle = function(req, res, next) { // this is basically your wrapper
let result = handle.apply(this, arguments);
// do some independent processing
return result;
};
this.isWrapped = true;
}
return handle_request.apply(this, arguments);
};
我可能会建议使用与express-promise-router
类似的方法,它实现了Express'Router
的直接替换。但是,这并不是隐含的。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
为什么不使用next()?
您可以在需求上添加内容,例如
app.get('/', (req, res, next) => {
req.somestupidfieldthatidontevenknowwhyinamedthisway = 42;
next();
});
app.get('/', (req, res, next) => {
//req.somestupidfieldthatidontevenknowwhyinamedthisway is now accessible as 42
var valueFromPreviousMiddleware = req.somestupidfieldthatidontevenknowwhyinamedthisway;
.....
});