我试图以设定的间隔找到五个最大的数字,同时还从数组中删除这些值。我需要抓住各自领域的顶级候选人。该范围可以更改,我需要查询的数量也可以更改。对此有一个有效且优雅的解决方案吗?优雅,我指的是一种算法(最好是散列)方法,它可以消除对稀疏和大型数组无性能的低效排序或操作。
var arr = [101, 88, 267, 175, 154, 39, 74, 217, 31, 105, 235, 31, 14, 49, 226, 195, 134, 207, 222, 281,
262, 112, 133, 115, 0, 53, 128, 103, 88, 145, 238, 13, 204, 199, 100, 247, 292, 157, 141, 286,
72, 160, 85, 61, 57, 54, 263, 50, 125, 179, 243, 281, 39, 76, 151, 79, 1, 238, 200, 249, 35, 82,
204, 174, 293, 216, 84, 209, 170, 236, 3, 247, 25, 162, 25, 57, 49, 215, 8, 167, 180, 268,
204, 257, 134, 151, 191, 81, 77, 106, 85, 128, 52, 136, 46, 185, 229, 116, 145, 253, 258, 222,
269, 225, 101, 175, 265, 77, 32, 8, 72, 54, 111, 264, 292, 161, 91, 215, 139, 245, 73, 127, 297,
73, 258, 183, 232, 55, 199, 175, 31, 24, 21, 155, 231, 95, 40, 223, 222, 86, 115, 210, 134, 229,
211, 54, 294, 153, 52, 165, 168, 125,186, 185, 289, 188, 248, 61, 136, 15, 19, 92, 200, 80, 208,
195, 241, 85, 288, 279, 119, 247, 208, 11, 80, 111, 29, 292, 222, 289, 70, 11, 209, 25, 267, 233,
16, 289, 154, 141, 174, 30, 156, 40, 266, 139, 116, 241, 1, 101, 109, 61, 220, 265, 45, 178, 166,
102, 181, 193, 202, 133, 200, 266, 114, 222, 231, 89, 190, 29, 20, 64, 233, 261,213, 40, 161, 167,
100, 121, 288, 268, 50, 264, 78, 105, 21, 33, 79, 114, 5, 134, 56, 259, 124, 44, 134, 133, 74, 176,
65, 68, 34, 56, 2, 287, 63, 167, 299, 59, 290, 241, 104, 75, 76, 116, 225, 297, 208, 136, 265, 290,
170, 267, 10, 176, 141, 217, 195, 4, 173, 32, 150, 271, 238, 171, 195, 16, 282, 77, 62, 39, 44, 248,
270, 222, 295, 122, 190, 230];
function maxAtIntervals (intervalLength, select, xs) {
const comparator = (a, b, _) => a - b;
const temp = [];
for (var i = 0; i < xs.length; i += intervalLength) {
const interval = xs.slice(i, i + intervalLength);
temp.push(interval.sort(comparator).slice(-select));
}
return temp;
}
console.log(maxAtIntervals(20, 5, arr));
&#13;
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
&#13;
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我已阅读@ le_m的评论但是找到k
最大/最小项目或k
最大/最小项目是O(n)中的复杂任务。它最好在排序和从数组的开头采取必要的实现。
因此,您可以执行以下操作;
function segmentAndTakeMax(ar,sl,mc) { // array , segment length, max count
var tempar = Array.from({length: sl});
return Array.from({length: Math.ceil(ar.length/sl)})
.map((_,i) => tempar.map((_,j) => arr[i*sl+j])
.sort((a,b) => b-a)
.slice(0,Math.min(arr.length-i*sl,mc)));
}
var arr = Array.from(new Array(203), _ => ~~(Math.random()*100));
console.log(arr);
console.log(segmentAndTakeMax(arr,20,5));
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
根据OP对V8的性能问题,我已经重新使用.reduce()
代码,这比V8中的.map()
要快得多。这是修改后的代码。
function segmentAndTakeMax(arr, n, m) {
var li = arr.length-1; // last index
return arr.reduce((r,e,i,a) => i%n ? (r[r.length-1].push(e), // if i%n != 0 then do these -> push e to last sub array
i == li && (r[r.length-1] = r[r.length-1].sort((a,b) => b-a).slice(0,m)), // short circuit for if i == last index then sort and slice the last sub array
r) // return r
: (i && (r[r.length-1] = r[r.length-1].sort((a,b) => b-a).slice(0,m)), // if i%n == 0 then do these -> short circuit for if i != 0 then sort and slice the last sub array
r.push([e]), // push [e] (a new sub array) to r
r), []); // return r
}
var arr = Array.from(new Array(203), _ => ~~(Math.random()*100));
console.log(arr);
console.log(segmentAndTakeMax(arr,20,5));
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }