我开发了一种自定义通信协议。在该协议中,每个分组由报头和有效载荷组成。每个有效负载包含多个命令。
我想在每个Command(Command0,...,Command N)中实现静态'decode'方法,因为所有相同类型的命令都以相同的方式解码(它们具有相同的字段结构)。我用了一个摘要 class'Command'作为模板,带有一些常见的字段和方法,以及一个抽象的'decode'方法用于我的命令。但由于超类方法是抽象的,Command0,...,CommandN中的'decode'方法不能是静态的。
有什么工作吗?每次我必须解码一些数据包时,我想避免实例化每个命令。
作为替代方案,我已经摆脱了抽象的“解码”方法,并在每个扩展命令的命令中包含了一个静态“解码”方法。但是,如果没有超类或接口,另一个程序员可能会忘记实现解码方法。 这个替代方案将导致以下代码:
{
switch(commandIdentifier)
{
case 0:
{
Command0 command0 = Command0.decode(dbConnection, header, data, offset);
payload.getCommands().add(command0);
break;
}
//...
case N:
{
CommandN commandN = CommandN.decode(dbConnection, header, data, offset);
payload.getCommands().add(commandN);
break;
}
default:
{
//some code
}
}
}
我首先要检查命令标识符。
我最初以这种方式实现了这些类:
public class Packet
{
private Header header;
private Payload payload;
public static Packet decode(Connection dbConnection, byte[] data, int offset) throws Exception
{
//...
}
}
public class Header
{
public static Header decode(byte[] data, int offset)
{
//...
}
}
public class Payload
{
private List<Command> commands;
public static Payload decode(Connection dbConnection, Header header, byte[] data, int offset)
{
//iterate over the data bytes to populate commands
}
}
public abstract class Command
{
public abstract Command decode(Connection dbConnection, Header header, byte[] data, int offset) throws Exception;
}
public class Command0
{
int field1;
String field2;
float field3;
public Command decode(Connection dbConnection, Header header, byte[] data, int offset) throws Exception; //I can't make it static and I'd like to because all commands of class Command0 are decoded the same way.
}
//...
public class Command N
{
int field1;
Map<Integer, ConfigBean> field2;
public Command decode(Connection dbConnection, Header header, byte[] data, int offset) throws Exception; //I can't make it static and I'd like to because all commands of class CommandN are decoded the same way.
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
您可以拥有一个enum
类,其中包含与命令相关的信息以及如何解码它。使用抽象方法而不是静态方法将迫使您为每个方法实现解码:
public enum CommandType {
COMMAND_0(0) {
@Override
public <T extends Command> T decode(Connection dbConnection, ResponseBuilder.Header header, byte[] data, int offset) throws Exception {
// decode Command 0
...
}
},
COMMAND_1(1) {
@Override
public <T extends Command> T decode(Connection dbConnection, ResponseBuilder.Header header, byte[] data, int offset) throws Exception {
// decode Command 1
...
}
}
...
COMMAND_N(N) {
@Override
public <T extends Command> T decode(Connection dbConnection, ResponseBuilder.Header header, byte[] data, int offset) throws Exception {
// decode Command N
...
}
}
;
private final int commandIdentifier;
CommandType(int commandIdentifier) {
this.commandIdentifier = commandIdentifier;
}
public abstract <T extends Command> T decode(Connection dbConnection, ResponseBuilder.Header header, byte[] data, int offset) throws Exception;
private static Map<Integer, CommandType> map = new HashMap<Integer, CommandType>();
static {
for (CommandType commandType : CommandType.values()) {
if (map.get(commandType.commandIdentifier) != null)
throw new IllegalStateException("There are several commands with the same identifier");
map.put(commandType.commandIdentifier, commandType);
}
}
public static CommandType fromIdentifier(int commandIdentifier) throws IllegalArgumentException {
CommandType commandType = map.get(commandIdentifier);
if (commandType == null)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unkown command identifier");
return commandType;
}
}
之后你可以简单地使用:
Command c = CommandType.fromIdentifier(commandIdentifier).decodedecode(dbConnection, header, data, offset);
我认为这是一种更时尚的处理方式