我使用httpcomponents来做http请求。我已将connectionRequestTimeout
,connectTimeout
和socketTimeout
设置为同一时间(例如8000毫秒)。系统具有高并发性,大部分时间表现良好,但有些请求的成本为秒,与每分钟的超时(~8000ms)相同。以下是代码段:
RequestConfig config = RequestConfig.custom().setConnectionRequestTimeout(TIMEOUT).setConnectTimeout(TIMEOUT).setSocketTimeout(TIMEOUT).build();
CloseableHttpClient client = HttpClientBuilder.create().setDefaultRequestConfig(config).build();
HttpUriRequest request = null;
switch (method) {
case GET:
String getUrl = url;
if (null != paramData) {
getUrl += "?" + paramData;
}
request = new HttpGet(getUrl);
break;
case POST:
...
default:
...
}
CloseableHttpResponse response = null;
try {
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
response = client.execute(request);
long time = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
// ***************************
// Sometime the log shows the cost is a few milliseconds more than TIMEOUT,
// but it does not throw any timeout exception and the response is fine.
// ***************************
LOG.debug("cost {}ms", time);
int resultCode = response.getStatusLine().getStatusCode();
HttpEntity entity = response.getEntity();
String resultJson = EntityUtils.toString(entity, UTF_8);
if (HttpStatus.SC_OK == resultCode) {
...
}
} catch (Exception e) {
...
} finally {
//abort the request
if (null != request && !request.isAborted()) {
request.abort();
}
//close the connection
HttpClientUtils.closeQuietly(client);
HttpClientUtils.closeQuietly(response);
}
httpcomponents的版本是4.5.2,jdk的版本是openjdk 1.8.0_92。
此外,我应该使用CloseableHttpClient
作为单身人员以获得更好的表现吗?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
CloseableHttpClient
应该使用单身以获得更好的性能。
您还可以根据HttpClientBuilder
中的要求定义连接数。
socketTimeout也应该更多是connectionTimeOut,这将有更多时间来读取套接字。