我试图创建一个允许通过该方法使用IOException
的实现,但发生了一些奇怪的事情
/**
* Represents a predicate (boolean-valued function) of two arguments. This is the two-arity specialization of {@link Predicate}.
*
* <p>
* This interface is similar to {@link BiPredicate} except that it is allowed to throw an {@link IOException}.
* </p>
*
* @param <T> the type of the first argument to the predicate
* @param <U> the type of the second argument the predicate
*
* @author Magno N A Cruz
* @see Predicate
*/
@FunctionalInterface
public interface IOBiPredicate<T, U> {
/**
* Evaluates this predicate on the given arguments.
*
* @param t the first input argument
* @param u the second input argument
* @return {@code true} if the input arguments match the predicate, otherwise {@code false}
* @throws IOException if there is an I/O error performing the operation.
*/
boolean test(T t, U u) throws IOException;
/**
* Returns a composed predicate that represents a short-circuiting logical AND of this predicate and another. When evaluating the composed predicate, if this
* predicate is {@code false}, then the {@code other} predicate is not evaluated.
*
* <p>
* Any exceptions thrown during evaluation of either predicate are relayed to the caller; if evaluation of this predicate throws an exception, the
* {@code other} predicate will not be evaluated.
* </p>
*
* @param other a predicate that will be logically-ANDed with this predicate
* @return a composed predicate that represents the short-circuiting logical AND of this predicate and the {@code other} predicate
* @throws NullPointerException if other is null
*/
default IOBiPredicate<T, U> and(BiPredicate<? super T, ? super U> other) {
Objects.requireNonNull(other);
return (T t, U u) -> test(t, u) && other.test(t, u);
}
/**
* Returns a predicate that represents the logical negation of this predicate.
*
* @return a predicate that represents the logical negation of this predicate
*/
default IOBiPredicate<T, U> negate() {
return (T t, U u) -> !test(t, u);
}
/**
* Returns a composed predicate that represents a short-circuiting logical OR of this predicate and another. When evaluating the composed predicate, if this
* predicate is {@code true}, then the {@code other} predicate is not evaluated.
*
* <p>
* Any exceptions thrown during evaluation of either predicate are relayed to the caller; if evaluation of this predicate throws an exception, the
* {@code other} predicate will not be evaluated.
* </p>
*
* @param other a predicate that will be logically-ORed with this predicate
* @return a composed predicate that represents the short-circuiting logical OR of this predicate and the {@code other} predicate
* @throws NullPointerException if other is null
*/
default BiPredicate<T, U> or(BiPredicate<? super T, ? super U> other) {
Objects.requireNonNull(other);
return (T t, U u) -> test(t, u) || other.test(t, u);
}
}
在lambda表达式(T t, U u) -> test(t, u) || other.test(t, u)
上,条件的第一部分即test(t, u)
给了我一个编译错误,说Unhandled exception type IOException
,但第二个,即other.test(t, u)
似乎工作正常,所以对我来说这是一个令人费解的情况,为什么它会发生在一个而不是另一个?
有没有一个干净的解决方案?如果没有,我怎么能修复它而不用计划上的kludges?
此问题类似于Java 8 Lambda function that throws exception?,但对于该问题中显示的简单函数,它适用于其他有条件的人BiPredicate
。
答案 0 :(得分:2)
请注意,在(T t, U u) -> test(t, u) || other.test(t, u);
中,test()
方法位于IOBiPredicate
上(因此被指定为throws IOException
),而other.test()
正在调用IOBiPredicate.or()
,但没有。这就是为什么只有lambda的前半部分导致编译错误。
由于throws IOException
方法未指定test()
,因此您在调用IOException
时会收到错误,因为它可能会抛出throws IOException
。
您应该将or()
添加到other
,并可能使IOBiPredicate
成为BiPredicate
,而不是BiPredicate
。通过将方法引用IOBiPredicate
传递给期望bipred::test
的方法,具有IOBiPredicate
的来电者始终可以将其转换为BiPredicate
。
根本问题是您似乎在混合IOBiPredicate
和IOBiPredicate
(也许您使BiPredicate
扩展IOBiPredicate
?),但它们不能安全地互换。您无法将BiPredicate
实例传递到采用IOBiPredicate
的方法,因为IOException
会抛出BiPredicate
,而Socket. Available
将无法处理哪些代码。这是违反BiPredicate.test()
的一个例子。