有人可以告诉我为什么使用以下代码app.receivedEvent('deviceready')
,而不是this.receivedEvent('deviceready')
?
var app = {
// Application Constructor
initialize: function() {
this.bindEvents();
},
// Bind Event Listeners
//
// Bind any events that are required on startup. Common events are:
// 'load', 'deviceready', 'offline', and 'online'.
bindEvents: function() {
document.addEventListener('deviceready', this.onDeviceReady, false);
},
// deviceready Event Handler
//
// The scope of 'this' is the event. In order to call the 'receivedEvent'
// function, we must explicitly call 'app.receivedEvent(...);'
onDeviceReady: function() {
app.receivedEvent('deviceready');
},
// Update DOM on a Received Event
receivedEvent: function(id) {
var parentElement = document.getElementById(id);
var listeningElement = parentElement.querySelector('.listening');
var receivedElement = parentElement.querySelector('.received');
listeningElement.setAttribute('style', 'display:none;');
receivedElement.setAttribute('style', 'display:block;');
console.log('Received Event: ' + id);
}
};
答案 0 :(得分:1)
评论实际上解释了使用app
优于this
的原因:
// The scope of 'this' is the event. In order to call the 'receivedEvent'
// function, we must explicitly call 'app.receivedEvent(...);'
基本上,事件处理程序将使用自己的this
上下文调用事件回调(其中this
将是事件对象)。
方法receivedEvent
在app中定义,而不是this
(设置为事件回调函数中的事件对象)。要在这种情况下调用receivedEventil
,您可以将其称为包含对象app
的方法:
app.receivedEvent(...);