我们有一个复杂的查询,它使用表和order_by之间的连接。
以下示例:
select distinct `accounts`.`id`,
`accounts`.`number_of_listings` as alias_0
from `accounts`
left outer join `revenue_item_account_leads` on `revenue_item_account_leads`.`account_id` = `accounts`.`id`
left outer join `matches` on `matches`.`matchable_id` = `accounts`.`id`
and `matches`.`matchable_type` = 'Account'
where `accounts`.`locale_id` = 1
and (
revenue_item_account_leads.platform_id is null
or (revenue_item_account_leads.platform_id != 6)
)
and (
matches.matched_matchable_id is null
or (
matches.matched_matchable_id in (14, 31, 37)
and matches.score < 0.75
)
or (matches.matched_matchable_id not in (14, 31, 37))
)
and (accounts.number_of_listings > 0)
order by `accounts`.`number_of_listings` desc LIMIT 25 OFFSET 0
没有order_by的查询在1秒内完成。 带有order_by的查询在5秒内完成(使其在生产中无法使用)。
已经有一个关于accounts.number_of_listings的索引。此外,还有我们加入的任何关联的索引。
关于如何改进这个的任何想法?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
尝试以下查询
select distinct `accounts`.`id`, `accounts`.`number_of_listings` as alias_0
from `accounts`
left outer join `revenue_item_account_leads`
on `revenue_item_account_leads`.`account_id` = `accounts`.`id`
and revenue_item_account_leads.platform_id = 6
left outer join `matches`
on `matches`.`matchable_id` = `accounts`.`id`
and `matches`.`matchable_type` = 'Account'
and matches.matched_matchable_id in (14, 31, 37)
and and matches.score >= 0.75
where `accounts`.`locale_id` = 1
and accounts.number_of_listings > 0
and revenue_item_account_leads.platform_id is null
and matches.matched_matchable_id is null
order by `accounts`.`number_of_listings` desc LIMIT 25 OFFSET 0
这些指数:
accounts(locale_id, number_of_listings, id)
revenue_item_account_leads(account_id, platform_id)
matches(matchable_id, matchable_type, matched_matchable_id, score)
根据您的关系和数据,您甚至可能不需要DISTINCT
关键字。