假设我有以下三个列表:
calc_points=np.asarray(
[ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47,
49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81,
83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97, 99])
out=[c+1 for c in calc_points]
inout=[c+3 for c in calc_points]
我希望将它们加入矩阵,其中第一列为calc_points
,然后是inout
,然后是out
,然后是inout
和out
。所以第一列只有一次,而其他两次重复5次。
我试过这样:
temp=[np.c_[calc_points,inout,out] for i in range(5)]
但它没有像想象的那样起作用。而不是
calc_point | inout |出| inout |出来......
它产生
calc_point | inout |出
calc_point | inout |出
答案 0 :(得分:2)
首先使用列表推导来构造列,然后将它们连接起来:
np.stack([calc_points]+[col for _ in range(5) for col in [calc_points+3, calc_points+1]], axis=-1)
#array([[ 0, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1],
# [ 1, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2],
# [ 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3],
# [ 3, 6, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4],
# [ 4, 7, 5, 7, 5, 7, 5, 7, 5, 7, 5],
# [ 5, 8, 6, 8, 6, 8, 6, 8, 6, 8, 6],
# ...
答案 1 :(得分:2)
列表理解度太低了。但是,你可以简单地使用列表理解里面下标:
np.c_[(calc_points,)+(inout,out)*5]
给出:
>>> np.c_[(calc_points,)+(inout,out)*5]
array([[ 0, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1],
[ 1, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2],
[ 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3],
[ 3, 6, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4],
[ 4, 7, 5, 7, 5, 7, 5, 7, 5, 7, 5],
[ 5, 8, 6, 8, 6, 8, 6, 8, 6, 8, 6],
[ 6, 9, 7, 9, 7, 9, 7, 9, 7, 9, 7],
[ 7, 10, 8, 10, 8, 10, 8, 10, 8, 10, 8],
[ 8, 11, 9, 11, 9, 11, 9, 11, 9, 11, 9],
[ 9, 12, 10, 12, 10, 12, 10, 12, 10, 12, 10],
[ 10, 13, 11, 13, 11, 13, 11, 13, 11, 13, 11],
[ 11, 14, 12, 14, 12, 14, 12, 14, 12, 14, 12],
[ 12, 15, 13, 15, 13, 15, 13, 15, 13, 15, 13],
[ 13, 16, 14, 16, 14, 16, 14, 16, 14, 16, 14],
(依此类推)
答案 2 :(得分:0)
另一个没有涉及循环的答案。
# make calc_points a column vector
In [49]: calc_points[:, np.newaxis]
# make array from the list repetitions
In [50]: np.array((inout, out) * 5).T
# concatenate all of them using np.hstack
In [51]: np.hstack((calc_points[:, np.newaxis], np.array([inout, out] * 5).T))
Out[51]:
array([[ 0, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1],
[ 1, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2],
[ 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3],
[ 3, 6, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4],
[ 4, 7, 5, 7, 5, 7, 5, 7, 5, 7, 5],
[ 5, 8, 6, 8, 6, 8, 6, 8, 6, 8, 6],
[ 6, 9, 7, 9, 7, 9, 7, 9, 7, 9, 7],
[ 7, 10, 8, 10, 8, 10, 8, 10, 8, 10, 8],
[ 8, 11, 9, 11, 9, 11, 9, 11, 9, 11, 9],
[ 9, 12, 10, 12, 10, 12, 10, 12, 10, 12, 10],
[ 10, 13, 11, 13, 11, 13, 11, 13, 11, 13, 11],
.....
.....
[ 99, 102, 100, 102, 100, 102, 100, 102, 100, 102, 100]])
效率:(按降序排列)
# interestingly list comprehension seems to be running like a war horse.
In [52]: %timeit np.stack([calc_points]+[col for _ in range(5) for col in [calc_points+3, calc_points+1]], axis=-1)
10000 loops, best of 3: 81.9 µs per loop
# almost 5x faster than using `np.c_`
In [53]: %timeit np.hstack((calc_points[:, np.newaxis], np.array((inout, out) * 5).T))
10000 loops, best of 3: 98.6 µs per loop
In [54]: %timeit np.c_[(calc_points,)+(inout,out)*5]
1000 loops, best of 3: 458 µs per loop