我为我的问题准备了一个简单的测试用例 -
在游戏玩家ID中,名称存储在表users
中:
CREATE TABLE users (
uid SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
name varchar(255) NOT NULL
);
玩家可以在表reviews
中使用2列PK:
CREATE TABLE reviews (
uid integer NOT NULL CHECK (uid <> author) REFERENCES users ON DELETE CASCADE,
author integer NOT NULL REFERENCES users(uid) ON DELETE CASCADE,
review varchar(255),
PRIMARY KEY(uid, author)
);
这两个表都填充了样本数据:
INSERT INTO users (uid, name) VALUES (1, 'User 1');
INSERT INTO users (uid, name) VALUES (2, 'User 2');
INSERT INTO users (uid, name) VALUES (3, 'User 3');
INSERT INTO users (uid, name) VALUES (4, 'User 4');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (1, 2, 'User 2 says: 1 is nice');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (1, 3, 'User 3 says: 1 is nice');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (1, 4, 'User 4 says: 1 is nice');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (2, 1, 'User 1 says: 2 is nice');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (2, 3, 'User 3 says: 2 is nice');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (2, 4, 'User 4 says: 2 is ugly');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (3, 1, 'User 1 says: 3 is nice');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (3, 2, 'User 2 says: 3 is ugly');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (3, 4, 'User 4 says: 3 is ugly');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (4, 1, 'User 1 says: 4 is ugly');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (4, 2, 'User 2 says: 4 is ugly');
INSERT INTO reviews (uid, author, review) VALUES (4, 3, 'User 3 says: 4 is ugly');
当我的移动应用程序注意到同一个玩家正在使用多个用户ID时,它会将记录与下面显示的自定义存储功能合并。
合并(到out_uid
)时,用户对自己的评论会被删除,任何产生的重叠评论都会被删除。
(在合并记录的背景下:这是非常必要的,因为我运行另一个玩家评论多年的游戏,用户一直纠缠着我 - 为什么他们的评论和游戏统计数据不同,当他们登录时通过Facebook,通过Google+,通过Apple Game Center ...)
由于没有UPDATE ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING
- 我试图在自定义存储功能中帮助自己处理以下两个INSERT ... SELECT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION merge_users(
in_uids integer[],
OUT out_uid integer
) RETURNS integer AS
$func$
BEGIN
SELECT
MIN(uid)
INTO STRICT
out_uid
FROM users
WHERE uid = ANY(in_uids);
-- delete self-reviews
DELETE FROM reviews
WHERE uid = out_uid
AND author = ANY(in_uids);
DELETE FROM reviews
WHERE author = out_uid
AND uid = ANY(in_uids);
-- try to copy as many reviews OF this user as possible
INSERT INTO reviews (
uid,
author,
review
) SELECT
out_uid, -- change to out_uid
author,
review
FROM reviews
WHERE uid <> out_uid
AND uid = ANY(in_uids)
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING;
DELETE FROM reviews
WHERE uid <> out_uid
AND uid = ANY(in_uids);
-- try to copy as many reviews BY this user as possible
INSERT INTO reviews (
uid,
author,
review
) SELECT
uid,
out_uid, -- change to out_uid
review
FROM reviews
WHERE author <> out_uid
AND author = ANY(in_uids)
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING;
DELETE FROM reviews
WHERE author <> out_uid
AND author = ANY(in_uids);
DELETE FROM users
WHERE uid <> out_uid
AND uid = ANY(in_uids);
END
$func$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
不幸的是,有问题 - 请运行2个命令来查看它们:
test=> SELECT out_uid FROM merge_users(ARRAY[1,2]);
out_uid
---------
1
(1 row)
test=> SELECT out_uid FROM merge_users(ARRAY[1,2,3,4]);
ERROR: new row for relation "reviews" violates check constraint "reviews_check"
DETAIL: Failing row contains (1, 1, User 4 says: 3 is ugly).
CONTEXT: SQL statement "INSERT INTO reviews (
uid,
author,
review
) SELECT
uid,
out_uid, -- change to out_uid
review
FROM reviews
WHERE author <> out_uid
AND author = ANY(in_uids)
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING"
PL/pgSQL function merge_users(integer[]) line 38 at SQL statement
所以删除自我评论似乎不起作用,请帮忙。
另外,我想知道是否有更好的方法来合并reviews
记录,而不是我的INSERT ... SELECT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING
技巧。
为方便起见,我创建了SQL Fiddle。
此外,我在非常有用的pgsql-general邮件列表中提出了这个问题。
答案 0 :(得分:2)
我想我会接受这个:
我认为这是失败的第一部分。试试这个delete
:
DELETE FROM reviews
WHERE uid = ANY(in_uids) AND author = ANY(in_uids);
也就是说,旧uids
的任何组合都是个问题。我不确定in_uids
是否包含所有等效的uid,但我们的想法是整个等效类用于此目的。