我正在尝试使用类似Redux的模式来维护特定功能的服务状态。我的意图是,消费者可以通过调用getItem1()
或getItem2()
来订阅单独的数据流,然后根据需要在服务上调用initializeItem1()
或initializeItem2()
等操作方法调度将改变商店状态的操作。在服务中,可以从http调用或其他内容获得数据,如在提供的plnkr中模拟的那样。
https://plnkr.co/edit/f3HLp5C8ckIpjNsM8dTm?p=preview
具体来说,我不明白为什么在我的示例代码中,getItem1()
返回的observable不会发出值,除非我将this.service.initializeItem1().subscribe();
更改为this.service.initializeItem1().subscribe(() => {});
。有人可以解释一下,如果这似乎是rxjs中的一个错误,如果有一个好的/已知的解释为什么这样做,或者我只是缺少一些东西?我感谢社区可以为我提供的任何见解。感谢。
组件
//our root app component
import {Component, OnInit} from '@angular/core'
import {Observable} from 'rxjs/Rx'
import {SampleService} from './sample.service'
@Component({
selector: 'my-app',
template: `
<div>
<h2>Item 1 Value</h2>
<div>{{ item1 }}</div>
<h2>Item 2 Value</h2>
<div>{{ item2 }}</div>
</div>
`,
})
export class App implements OnInit {
name:string;
item1: string;
item2: string;
constructor(private service: SampleService) { }
ngOnInit() {
this.item1 = this.service.getItem1().subscribe(item1 => this.item1 = item1);
this.item2 = this.service.getItem2().subscribe(item2 => this.item2 = item2);
/* broken */
//Item 1 does not display
//Item 2 displays as expected
this.scenario1();
/* works */
//Item 1 displays as expected
//Item 2 displays as expected
// this.scenario2();
}
private scenario1() {
this.service.initializeItem1().subscribe();
this.service.initializeItem2().subscribe();
}
private scenario2() {
this.service.initializeItem1().subscribe(() => {});
this.service.initializeItem2().subscribe();
}
}
服务
import {Injectable} from '@angular/core'
import {Observable, Subject} from 'rxjs/Rx'
import { Http, Headers } from '@angular/http';
@Injectable()
export class SampleService {
constructor(private http: Http) { }
private headers: Headers = new Headers({ 'Content-Type': 'application/json' });
private _store: Subject<any> = new Subject<any>();
private store = this._store.asObservable()
.startWith({})
.scan(reducer);
public initializeItem1(): Observable<string> {
return this.http.get('api/foobar')
.map(response => response.json().item).do(data => {
console.log('not hit in scenario 1, but hit in scenario 2:', data);
this._store.next({
type: 'INITIALIZE_1',
payload: data
});
});
}
public initializeItem2(): Observable<string> {
return Observable.of('foobar-2').do(data => {
console.log('hit in scenario 1 and scenario 2:', data);
this._store.next({
type: 'INITIALIZE_2',
payload: data
});
});
}
getItem1(): Observable<string> {
return this.store.map(store => store.settings1);
}
getItem2(): Observable<string> {
return this.store.map(store => store.settings2);
}
}
function reducer(store, action) {
switch(action.type) {
case 'INITIALIZE_1':
return Object.assign({ }, store, {
initialSettings: action.payload,
settings1: action.payload
});
case 'INITIALIZE_2':
return Object.assign({ }, store, { settings2:action.payload });
default:
return store;
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:3)
这是RxJS 5中直到RxJS 5.2.0版本的错误。它已经修复但尚未发布。
唯一的解决方法是使用任何订阅者,例如() => {}
(我认为只使用{}
也可以。)
在RxJS上合并公关GitHub解决了这个问题:
相关问题: