请使用以下代码:
#include <iostream>
#include <functional>
template <template<typename> class Op>
auto applyOp(const uint8_t lhs, const uint8_t rhs) {
constexpr Op<uint8_t> op;
return op(lhs, rhs);
}
int main() {
std::cout << +applyOp<std::bit_and>(19, 180) << std::endl;
}
使用g++
时,编译并运行正常。但是clang++
会产生错误:
test.cpp:5:27: error: default initialization of an object of const type 'const bit_and<uint8_t>' (aka 'const bit_and<unsigned char>') without a user-provided default constructor
constexpr Op<uint8_t> op;
^
{}
test.cpp:11:19: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'applyOp<std::bit_and>' requested here
std::cout << +applyOp<std::bit_and>(19, 180) << std::endl;
^
1 error generated.
所以我看了一下bit_and的源代码:
// Copyright (C) 2001-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
//
// This file is part of the GNU ISO C++ Library. This library is free
// software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
// terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
// Free Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option)
// any later version.
// This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
// GNU General Public License for more details.
// Under Section 7 of GPL version 3, you are granted additional
// permissions described in the GCC Runtime Library Exception, version
// 3.1, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License and
// a copy of the GCC Runtime Library Exception along with this program;
// see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively. If not, see
// <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
/*
*
* Copyright (c) 1994
* Hewlett-Packard Company
*
* Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute and sell this software
* and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee,
* provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and
* that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear
* in supporting documentation. Hewlett-Packard Company makes no
* representations about the suitability of this software for any
* purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty.
*
*
* Copyright (c) 1996-1998
* Silicon Graphics Computer Systems, Inc.
*
* Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute and sell this software
* and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee,
* provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and
* that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear
* in supporting documentation. Silicon Graphics makes no
* representations about the suitability of this software for any
* purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty.
*/
[ ... content omitted ... ]
template<typename _Arg1, typename _Arg2, typename _Result>
struct binary_function
{
/// @c first_argument_type is the type of the first argument
typedef _Arg1 first_argument_type;
/// @c second_argument_type is the type of the second argument
typedef _Arg2 second_argument_type;
/// @c result_type is the return type
typedef _Result result_type;
};
[ ... content omitted ... ]
#if __cplusplus > 201103L
template<typename _Tp = void>
struct bit_and;
[ ... content omitted ... ]
#endif
[ ... content omitted ... ]
// _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS
// DR 660. Missing Bitwise Operations.
template<typename _Tp>
struct bit_and : public binary_function<_Tp, _Tp, _Tp>
{
_GLIBCXX14_CONSTEXPR
_Tp
operator()(const _Tp& __x, const _Tp& __y) const
{ return __x & __y; }
};
[ ... content omitted ... ]
我可以告诉你,这里应该生成一个默认的构造函数。 有趣的是,错误消息特别要求用户提供的默认构造函数&#34;而不只是一个&#34;默认构造函数&#34;。
更改违规行以使用统一初始化会导致代码与两个编译器一起使用:
- constexpr Op<uint8_t> op;
+ constexpr Op<uint8_t> op { };
我的问题是,clang++
在要求这些额外的大括号时是正确的,还是g++
正确的呢?
额外信息
使用g++
命令进行编译:
g++ test.cpp -Werror -Wall -pedantic -std=c++14
使用clang++
命令进行编译:
clang++ test.cpp -Werror -Wall -pedantic -std=c++14
运行应用程序命令:
./a.out
bit_and
定义的位置:
/usr/include/c++/6.2.0/bits/stl_function.h
关于possible duplicate标志,我不相信这是重复的,因为这个问题是问为什么这个规则存在,而我的问题更多是关于在第一个中查明规则地方和哪个编译器的执行是正确的。此外,所谓的副本的答案不能回答我的问题。
答案 0 :(得分:9)
[dcl.init]中的原始C ++ 14措辞要求:
如果程序要求对
const
- 限定类型T
的对象进行默认初始化,T
应为具有用户提供的默认值的类类型构造强>
因此,简单地使用默认构造函数是不够的。它还需要由用户提供。 Clang实现了这个规则,它需要constexpr Op<uint8_t> op{};
,但是gcc没有 - 在这种情况下允许默认初始化。
然而,这句话最近刚刚在p0490进行了修订。新的措辞,追溯适用于C ++ 14,读作:
如果
T
的默认初始化将调用用户提供的T
构造函数(未继承),则类类型T
为 const-default-constructible 来自基类)或如果
-M
的每个直接非变体非静态数据成员T
都有默认成员初始值设定项,或者,如果M
属于类X
(或其数组),X
是const-default-constructible,
- 如果T
是与至少一个非静态数据成员的并集,则只有一个变体成员具有默认成员初始值设定项,
- 如果T
不是联合,则对于每个具有至少一个非静态数据成员(如果有)的匿名联合成员,只有一个非静态数据成员具有默认成员初始化程序,并且每个可能构造的基础T
的类是const-default-constructible。如果程序要求对const限定类型T的对象进行默认初始化,则T应为const-default-constructible类类型或其数组。
Op<uint8_t>
是 const-default-constructible (因为它没有非静态数据成员),所以你可以默认初始化它。现在,C ++ 14将允许:
constexpr Op<uint8_t> op;
实际上,我们从一个gcc bug(允许默认初始化)到一个clang bug(不允许它)。