我有多个与他们共享方法的枚举。如果可能的话,我想将它移动到界面,所以我不必复制它,代码看起来会更清晰。但是经过很多努力,我仍然无法将方法移动到接口。
public enum TypeA {
ValueAA ("Value AA"),
ValueAB ("Value AB");
private final String type;
TypeA (final String type) {
this.type = type;
}
@JsonValue
public String getType() {
return this.type;
}
@JsonCreator
public static TypeA fromValue(final String value) {
for (TypeA t : TypeA.values()) {
if (t.getType().equalsIgnoreCase(value)) {
return t;
}
}
StringBuilder allTypes = new StringBuilder();
boolean bFirstTime = true;
for (TypeA val : TypeA.values()) {
allTypes.append(bFirstTime ? "" : ", ").append(val);
bFirstTime = false;
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException(value + " is an invalid value. Supported values are " + allTypes);
}
}
public enum TypeB {
ValueBA ("Value BA"),
ValueBB ("Value BB");
private final String type;
TypeB (final String type) {
this.type = type;
}
@JsonValue
public String getType() {
return this.type;
}
@JsonCreator
public static TypeB fromValue(final String value) {
for (TypeB t : TypeB.values()) {
if (t.getType().equalsIgnoreCase(value)) {
return t;
}
}
StringBuilder allTypes = new StringBuilder();
boolean bFirstTime = true;
for (TypeB val : TypeB.values()) {
allTypes.append(bFirstTime ? "" : ", ").append(val);
bFirstTime = false;
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException(value + " is an invalid value. Supported values are " + allTypes);
}
}
使用Generics和Java 8无论如何都要将getType
和fromValue
方法移动到接口,以便我可以在所有枚举中共享?另请注意杰克逊注释JsonValue
& JsonCreator
。
答案 0 :(得分:3)
您可以将fromValue
实现移动到interface
,但是,我想,您必须在具体类型中保留存根以支持JSON工厂注释:
interface TypeX {
String getType();
static <T extends Enum<T>&TypeX> T fromValue(String value, Class<T> type) {
EnumSet<T> all=EnumSet.allOf(type);
for (T t: all) {
if (t.getType().equalsIgnoreCase(value)) {
return t;
}
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException(all.stream().map(t -> t.getType())
.collect(Collectors.joining(", ",
value+" is an invalid value. Supported values are ", "")));
}
}
public enum TypeA implements TypeX {
ValueAA ("Value AA"),
ValueAB ("Value AB");
private final String type;
TypeA (final String type) {
this.type = type;
}
@JsonValue
public String getType() {
return this.type;
}
@JsonCreator
public static TypeA fromValue(final String value) {
return TypeX.fromValue(value, TypeA.class);
}
}
enum TypeB implements TypeX {
ValueBA ("Value BA"),
ValueBB ("Value BB");
private final String type;
TypeB (final String type) {
this.type = type;
}
@JsonValue
public String getType() {
return this.type;
}
@JsonCreator
public static TypeB fromValue(final String value) {
return TypeX.fromValue(value, TypeB.class);
}
}
为了完整性,由于type属性是不变的,如果我们使用不同的实现,可以将getType
方法移动到interface
:
interface TypeX {
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @interface Type { String value(); }
@JsonValue default String getType() {
for(Field f: getDeclaringClass().getDeclaredFields()) try {
if(f.isEnumConstant() && f.get(null)==this) {
return f.getAnnotation(Type.class).value();
}
} catch(IllegalAccessException ex) {
throw new AssertionError(ex);
}
throw new IllegalStateException();
}
Class<? extends TypeX> getDeclaringClass();
static <T extends Enum<T>&TypeX> T fromValue(String value, Class<T> type) {
EnumSet<T> all=EnumSet.allOf(type);
for (T t: all) {
if (t.getType().equalsIgnoreCase(value)) {
return t;
}
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException(all.stream().map(t -> t.getType())
.collect(Collectors.joining(", ",
value+" is an invalid value. Supported values are ", "")));
}
}
public enum TypeA implements TypeX {
@Type("Value AA") ValueAA,
@Type("Value AB") ValueAB;
@JsonCreator
public static TypeA fromValue(final String value) {
return TypeX.fromValue(value, TypeA.class);
}
}
enum TypeB implements TypeX {
@Type("Value BA") ValueBA,
@Type("Value BB") ValueBB;
@JsonCreator
public static TypeB fromValue(final String value) {
return TypeX.fromValue(value, TypeB.class);
}
}
但这有几个缺点,例如在编译时不检查基于反射的访问,并且在运行时可能存在性能缺陷。我不知道@JsonValue
在default
继承自interface
方法时是否会以预期的方式得到尊重。