为什么按钮单击触发器与setTimeout()触发器不同?

时间:2017-03-07 22:11:12

标签: reactjs rxjs rxjs5

考虑以下几乎完全相同的两个片段。

区别在于:

  • 第一个使用setTimeout()来触发事件
  • 第二个单击按钮时触发事件

如果您检查控制台,您会看到代码段1中的最后两行是:

App rendering 1 folder(s)
Observed js

并在代码段2中:

Observed js
App rendering 1 folder(s)

问题:为什么订单被撤销了?

setTimeout() playground

Button playground

Snippet 1:setTimeout()触发器

class App extends React.Component {
  constructor() {
    super();
    
    this.events$ = new Rx.Subject();
    this.eventsByName$ = this.events$.groupBy(e => e.name);
    
    this.state = {};
    
    setTimeout(() => {
      console.log('Emitting event');
      
      this.events$.next({
        type: 'ADD_FOLDER',
        name: 'js',
        permissions: 400
      });
    }, 1000);
  }
  
  componentDidMount() {
    this.eventsByName$.subscribe(folderEvents$ => {
      const folder = folderEvents$.key;
      
      console.log(`New stream for "${folder}" created`);

      folderEvents$.subscribe(e => {
        console.log(`Observed ${e.name}`);
      });
      
      this.setState({
        [folder]: folderEvents$
      });
    });
  }
  
  render() {
    const folders = Object.keys(this.state);
    
    console.log(`App rendering ${folders.length} folder(s)`);
    
    return (
      <div>
        {
          folders.map(folder => (
            <div key={folder}>
              {folder}
            </div>
          ))
        }
      </div>
    );
  }
}

ReactDOM.render(
  <App />,
  document.getElementById('app')
);
<head>
  <script src="https://unpkg.com/rxjs@5.2.0/bundles/Rx.js"></script>
  <script src="https://unpkg.com/react@15.4.2/dist/react.js"></script>
  <script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom@15.4.2/dist/react-dom.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
  <div id="app"></div>
</body>

代码段2:按钮触发器

class App extends React.Component {
  constructor() {
    super();
    
    this.events$ = new Rx.Subject();
    this.eventsByName$ = this.events$.groupBy(e => e.name);
    
    this.state = {};
  }
  
  componentDidMount() {
    this.eventsByName$.subscribe(folderEvents$ => {
      const folder = folderEvents$.key;
      
      console.log(`New stream for "${folder}" created`);
      
      folderEvents$.subscribe(e => {
        console.log(`Observed ${e.name}`);
      });
      
      this.setState({
        [folder]: folderEvents$
      });
    });
  }
  
  onClick = () => {
    console.log('Emitting event');
    
    this.events$.next({
      type: 'ADD_FOLDER',
      name: 'js',
      permissions: 400
    });
  };
  
  render() {
    const folders = Object.keys(this.state);
    
    console.log(`App rendering ${folders.length} folder(s)`);
    
    return (
      <div>
        <button onClick={this.onClick}>
          Add event
        </button>
        <div>
          {
            folders.map(folder => (
              <div key={folder}>
                {folder}
              </div>
            ))
          }
        </div>
      </div>
    );
  }
}

ReactDOM.render(
  <App />,
  document.getElementById('app')
);
<head>
  <script src="https://unpkg.com/rxjs@5.2.0/bundles/Rx.js"></script>
  <script src="https://unpkg.com/react@15.4.2/dist/react.js"></script>
  <script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom@15.4.2/dist/react-dom.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
  <div id="app"></div>
</body>

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:3)

它们以不同的顺序运行,因为React尝试一起批处理setState(),因此调用setState()不会导致组件同步重新呈现,而是等待事件回调返回。

但是,当且仅当您对setState的调用是由onClick引起的React驱动事件的结果时才会执行此操作。当您使用setTimeout时,React(当前)无法知道您何时完成,因此无法将它们一起批处理。相反,它会同时重新渲染。

我能说的最好,React docs仅在传递中间接提到这种行为:

  

setState()不会立即改变this.state但会创建一个   待定状态转换。调用后访问this.state   方法可以返回现有值。

     

无法保证调用setState的同步操作   并且可以批量调用以获得性能提升。

     

https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/react-component.html#setstate

如果你想让React批量处理,你需要将你的回调代码包装在ReactDOM.unstable_batchedUpdates中,顾名思义它不是一个稳定的API,所以它可以(并且可能会)在没有警告的情况下改变。

setTimeout(() => {
  ReactDOM.unstable_batchedUpdates(() => {
    console.log('Emitting event');

    this.events$.next({
      type: 'ADD_FOLDER',
      name: 'js',
      permissions: 400
    });
  });
}, 1000);

理想情况下,您的代码的结构将与订单无关紧要。