我正在尝试使用Bytebuddy 1.6.7重新命名并重命名类来拦截它的构造函数
我正在研究SAAS系统,用户可以在其中提供带注释的java类,系统应该在存储或启动之前对其进行检测。我开发了管道来执行我需要的仪器,但它可以在两个地方使用。
第一个模块对类进行检测并存储它们而不加载。它使用类名作为“组件”id,因此我不想创建检测类型的子类以避免类名中不必要的后缀。这就是我想使用rebase的原因。
另一个模块工具已经加载了类并立即使用它们而不关心类名。在这个模块中,我想重用第一个模块中的代码,并在加载之前另外更改已检测类型的名称。
完整的工作示例是here。
我想知道为什么以下方法适用于内部类,但不适用于根类。
private static void rebaseConstructorSimple(Class<?> clazz) throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException {
new ByteBuddy()
.rebase(clazz)
.name(clazz.getName() + "Rebased")
.constructor(ElementMatchers.any())
.intercept(SuperMethodCall.INSTANCE.andThen(
MethodDelegation.to(new ConstructorInterceptor()
)))
.make()
.load(clazz.getClassLoader(), ClassLoadingStrategy.Default.INJECTION)
.getLoaded()
.newInstance();
}
如果我提供root类,我会得到以下异常:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot call super (or default) method for public OuterClassRebased()
at net.bytebuddy.implementation.SuperMethodCall$Appender.apply(SuperMethodCall.java:97)
at net.bytebuddy.implementation.bytecode.ByteCodeAppender$Compound.apply(ByteCodeAppender.java:134)
at net.bytebuddy.dynamic.scaffold.TypeWriter$MethodPool$Record$ForDefinedMethod$WithBody.applyCode(TypeWriter.java:614)
at net.bytebuddy.dynamic.scaffold.TypeWriter$MethodPool$Record$ForDefinedMethod$WithBody.applyBody(TypeWriter.java:603)
at net.bytebuddy.dynamic.scaffold.TypeWriter$Default$ForInlining$RedefinitionClassVisitor$CodePreservingMethodVisitor.visitCode(TypeWriter.java:3912)
at net.bytebuddy.jar.asm.MethodVisitor.visitCode(Unknown Source)
at net.bytebuddy.jar.asm.ClassReader.b(Unknown Source)
at net.bytebuddy.jar.asm.ClassReader.accept(Unknown Source)
at net.bytebuddy.jar.asm.ClassReader.accept(Unknown Source)
at net.bytebuddy.dynamic.scaffold.TypeWriter$Default$ForInlining.create(TypeWriter.java:2894)
at net.bytebuddy.dynamic.scaffold.TypeWriter$Default.make(TypeWriter.java:1612)
at net.bytebuddy.dynamic.scaffold.inline.RebaseDynamicTypeBuilder.make(RebaseDynamicTypeBuilder.java:200)
at net.bytebuddy.dynamic.scaffold.inline.AbstractInliningDynamicTypeBuilder.make(AbstractInliningDynamicTypeBuilder.java:92)
at net.bytebuddy.dynamic.DynamicType$Builder$AbstractBase.make(DynamicType.java:2560)
at net.bytebuddy.dynamic.DynamicType$Builder$AbstractBase$Delegator.make(DynamicType.java:2662)
at TestConstructorInterceptor.rebaseConstructorSimple(TestConstructorInterceptor.java:35)
at TestConstructorInterceptor.main(TestConstructorInterceptor.java:89)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:147)
正如我前面提到的,如果没有加载类,我可以避免上课:
public static void rebaseConstructorNotLoaded(String classPath, String className) throws Exception {
ClassFileLocator.ForFolder folderClassLoader = new ClassFileLocator.ForFolder(new File(classPath));
TypePool typePool = TypePool.Default.ofClassPath();
TypeDescription typeDescription = typePool.describe(className).resolve();
new ByteBuddy()
.rebase(typeDescription, folderClassLoader)
.constructor(ElementMatchers.any())
.intercept(
SuperMethodCall.INSTANCE.andThen(
MethodDelegation.to(new ConstructorInterceptor())))
.make()
.load(TestConstructorInterceptor.class.getClassLoader(), ClassLoadingStrategy.Default.INJECTION)
.getLoaded()
.newInstance();
}
此外,我还可以通过以下步骤实现目标:重命名重命名,make。然后创建SimpleClassLoader,它只包含新类名的生成字节。拦截构造函数
public static void rebaseWithIntermediateMake(Class<?> clazz) throws IllegalAccessException, InstantiationException {
DynamicType.Unloaded<?> unloaded = new ByteBuddy()
.rebase(clazz)
.name(clazz.getName() + "Rebased")
.make();
ClassFileLocator dynamicTypesLocator = getClassFileLocatorForDynamicTypes(unloaded);
TypeDescription typeDescription = unloaded.getTypeDescription();
new ByteBuddy()
.rebase(typeDescription, dynamicTypesLocator)
.constructor(ElementMatchers.any())
.intercept(
SuperMethodCall.INSTANCE.andThen(
MethodDelegation.to(new ConstructorInterceptor())))
.make()
.load(clazz.getClassLoader(), ClassLoadingStrategy.Default.INJECTION)
.getLoaded()
.newInstance();
}
private static ClassFileLocator getClassFileLocatorForDynamicTypes(DynamicType.Unloaded<?> unloaded) {
Map<TypeDescription, byte[]> allTypes = unloaded.getAllTypes();
Map<String, byte[]> nameByteMap = new HashMap<>();
for (Map.Entry<TypeDescription, byte[]> entry : allTypes.entrySet()) {
nameByteMap.put(entry.getKey().getName(), entry.getValue());
}
return new ClassFileLocator.Simple(nameByteMap);
}
我检查了ByteBuddy代码,并且可能找到了导致第一次测试失败的代码。
当在RebaseDynamicTypeBuilder here中构造MethodRebaseResolver时,我们在得到的methodRebaseResolver中获得了0 instrumentedMethods。看来,matching期间的RebasableMatcher在instrumentedMethodTokens中具有单个值:
MethodDescription.Token{name='<init>', modifiers=1, typeVariableTokens=[],
returnType=void, parameterTokens=[], exceptionTypes=[], annotations=[],
defaultValue=null, receiverType=class net.bytebuddy.dynamic.TargetType}
但与以下目标相匹配
MethodDescription.Token{name='<init>', modifiers=1, typeVariableTokens=[],
returnType=void, parameterTokens=[], exceptionTypes=[], annotations=[],
defaultValue=null, receiverType=class OuterClass}
标记是不同的,因为它们具有不同的接收器类型,并且构造函数没有被检测。
最后,问题是:如果想使用rebase + rename,我在做概念错误的事情。可能这是一个错误?