R中的chi-sq的后期测试

时间:2017-02-07 17:31:22

标签: r statistics

我有一张看起来像这样的桌子。

> dput(theft_loc)
structure(c(13704L, 14059L, 14263L, 14450L, 14057L, 15503L, 14230L, 
16758L, 15289L, 15499L, 16066L, 15905L, 18531L, 19217L, 12410L, 
13398L, 13308L, 13455L, 13083L, 14111L, 13068L, 19569L, 18771L, 
19626L, 20290L, 19816L, 20923L, 20466L, 20517L, 19377L, 20035L, 
20504L, 20393L, 22409L, 22289L, 7997L, 8106L, 7971L, 8437L, 8246L, 
9090L, 8363L, 7934L, 7874L, 7909L, 8150L, 8191L, 8746L, 8277L, 
27194L, 25220L, 26034L, 27080L, 27334L, 30819L, 30633L, 10452L, 
10848L, 11301L, 11494L, 11265L, 11985L, 11038L, 12104L, 13368L, 
14594L, 14702L, 13891L, 12891L, 12939L), .Dim = c(7L, 10L), .Dimnames = structure(list(
    c("Sunday", "Monday", "Tuesday", "Wednesday", "Thursday", 
    "Friday", "Saturday"), c("BAYVIEW", "CENTRAL", "INGLESIDE", 
    "MISSION", "NORTHERN", "PARK", "RICHMOND", "SOUTHERN", "TARAVAL", 
    "TENDERLOIN")), .Names = c("", "")), class = "table")

我跑了一个chisq.test,结果重来了。我现在想要进行一些成对测试以了解其重要性。我尝试使用fifer包和chisq.post.test函数,但收到的错误是out of workspace

我可以通过其他方式进行多重比较测试?

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

这将有效(在事后测试中尝试chisq.test而不是默认fisher.test(精确)):

(Xsq <- chisq.test(theft_loc))  # Prints test summary, p-value very small,
#       Pearson's Chi-squared test
# data:  theft_loc
# X-squared = 1580.1, df = 54, p-value < 2.2e-16 # reject null hypothesis for independence

library(fifer)
chisq.post.hoc(theft_loc, test='chisq.test')

带输出

 Adjusted p-values used the fdr method.

               comparison  raw.p  adj.p
1       Sunday vs. Monday 0.0000 0.0000
2      Sunday vs. Tuesday 0.0000 0.0000
3    Sunday vs. Wednesday 0.0000 0.0000
4     Sunday vs. Thursday 0.0000 0.0000
5       Sunday vs. Friday 0.0000 0.0000
6     Sunday vs. Saturday 0.0000 0.0000
7      Monday vs. Tuesday 0.0000 0.0000
8    Monday vs. Wednesday 0.0000 0.0000
9     Monday vs. Thursday 0.0000 0.0000
10      Monday vs. Friday 0.0000 0.0000
11    Monday vs. Saturday 0.0000 0.0000
12  Tuesday vs. Wednesday 0.1451 0.1451
13   Tuesday vs. Thursday 0.0000 0.0000
14     Tuesday vs. Friday 0.0000 0.0000
15   Tuesday vs. Saturday 0.0000 0.0000
16 Wednesday vs. Thursday 0.0016 0.0017
17   Wednesday vs. Friday 0.0000 0.0000
18 Wednesday vs. Saturday 0.0000 0.0000
19    Thursday vs. Friday 0.0000 0.0000
20  Thursday vs. Saturday 0.0000 0.0000
21    Friday vs. Saturday 0.0000 0.0000

正如我们所看到的,除了一对夫妇之外的所有成对测试都很重要,我们也可以使用不同的p-value-correction(将control从默认fdr更改为bonferroni )。

答案 1 :(得分:1)

由于fifer这里不再保持与RVAideMemoire的溶液(更详细地描述这里https://rdrr.io/cran/RVAideMemoire/src/R/chisq.multcomp.R):

install.packages("RVAideMemoire")
library(RVAideMemoire)
chisq.multcomp(theft_loc, p.method = "none")
>      7874    7909    7934    7971    7997    8106    8150    8191    8246    8277    8363    8437    8746    9090    10452   10848   11038   11265   11301  
7909  0.78056 -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
7934  0.63321 0.84256 -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
7971  0.44095 0.62272 0.76923 -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
7997  0.32889 0.48533 0.61768 0.83698 -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
8106  0.06647 0.11954 0.17444 0.28701 0.39036 -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
8150  0.02923 0.05720 0.08854 0.15860 0.22857 0.73002 -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
8191  0.01238 0.02625 0.04298 0.08354 0.12732 0.50552 0.74841 -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
8246  0.00339 0.00802 0.01417 0.03081 0.05073 0.27360 0.45342 0.66793 -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
8277  0.00152 0.00382 0.00706 0.01637 0.02817 0.18156 0.32174 0.50276 0.80943 -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
8363  0.00012 0.00037 0.00078 0.00216 0.00422 0.04522 0.09741 0.18128 0.36396 0.50497 -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
8437  1.0e-05 3.6e-05 8.5e-05 0.00027 0.00060 0.01007 0.02585 0.05643 0.13921 0.21586 0.56805 -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
8746  1.3e-11 8.8e-11 3.2e-10 2.0e-09 7.1e-09 8.2e-07 4.5e-06 2.0e-05 0.00013 0.00032 0.00341 0.01841 -       -       -       -       -       -       -      
9090  < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 6.2e-14 8.1e-13 8.0e-12 1.5e-10 6.9e-10 3.7e-08 8.1e-07 0.01000 -       -       -       -       -       -      
10452 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 < 2e-16 -       -       -       -       - 

类别由每个类别的计数代替。 我不喜欢用于多重比较校正(参见参考文献下面的讨论),但fdr是可用的。

Moran,M.D.(2003)。在生态学研究中拒绝序贯的Bonferroni的观点。 Oikos。