请原谅人为的例子。我无法弄清楚为什么会发生这些选择。
域对象:
class Author {
String name
Location location
static mapping = {
location lazy: true //this is default, but set here to reduce confusion
}
static constraints = {
}
}
...
class Location {
String address
static hasOne = [longLat : LongLat]
static constraints = {
}
}
...
class LongLat {
String longitude
String latitude
static belongsTo = [location:Location]
static constraints = {
}
}
...
Bootstrap init:
def init = { servletContext ->
Location loc = new Location(address: '123 asdf dr', longLat: new LongLat(longitude: 0.5, latitude: 0.5)).save(flush:true)
new Author(name: 'Author Name', location: loc).save(flush:true)
}
...
来自控制器的行动:
def index() {
println "Start Controller"
Author.get(1)
render '1'
println "End Controller"
}
我已开启日志记录:
logSql: true
formatSql: true
输出:
Grails application running at http://localhost:8080 in environment: development
Start Controller
Hibernate:
select
this_.id as id1_0_0_,
this_.version as version2_0_0_,
this_.location_id as location3_0_0_,
this_.name as name4_0_0_
from
author this_
where
this_.id = ?
End Controller
Hibernate:
select
location0_.id as id1_1_0_,
location0_.version as version2_1_0_,
location0_.address as address3_1_0_
from
location location0_
where
location0_.id=?
Hibernate:
select
longlat0_.id as id1_2_0_,
longlat0_.version as version2_2_0_,
longlat0_.latitude as latitude3_2_0_,
longlat0_.location_id as location4_2_0_,
longlat0_.longitude as longitud5_2_0_
from
long_lat longlat0_
where
longlat0_.location_id=?
为什么最后两个选择发生了,如何在不诉诸HQL的情况下阻止它们?
我正在使用Grails 3.2.3。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
根据我们在评论中的对话,结果很可能与OSIV(视野中的开放会话)有关。解决方案是使用.discard()
来确保hibernate不会检查是否有任何更改(例如脏检查)并且需要保留。