Question

以下哪种查询样式更适合性能？

基本上，我使用GROUP_CONCAT将许多相关记录返回到一行，我需要通过GROUP_CONCAT值上的另一个连接进行过滤，并且我需要添加更多连接/ group_concats / havings或子查询以便按更多相关值过滤。我看到，正式地，LEFT JOIN更快，但我想知道GROUP_CONCAT和HAVING是否通过关闭。

（这是一个非常简化的例子，实际数据有更多的属性，它是从Drupal MySQL架构中读取的）

谢谢！

Main Records
+----+-----------------+----------------+-----------+-----------+
| id | other_record_id | value          | type      | attribute |
+----+-----------------+----------------+-----------+-----------+
|  1 |               0 | Red Building   | building  |           |
|  2 |               1 | ACME Plumbing  | attribute | company   |
|  3 |               1 | east_side      | attribute | location  |
|  4 |               0 | Green Building | building  |           |
|  5 |               4 | AJAX Heating   | attribute | company   |
|  6 |               4 | west_side      | attribute | location  |
|  7 |               0 | Blue Building  | building  |           |
|  8 |               7 | ZZZ Mattresses | attribute | company   |
|  9 |               7 | south_side     | attribute | location  |
+----+-----------------+----------------+-----------+-----------+

location_transaltions
+-------------+------------+
| location_id | value      |
+-------------+------------+
|           1 | east_side  |
|           2 | west_side  |
|           3 | south_side |
+-------------+------------+

locations
+----+--------------------+
| id | name               |
+----+--------------------+
|  1 | Arts District      |
|  2 | Warehouse District |
|  3 | Suburb             |
+----+--------------------+

查询＃1

SELECT 
    a.id, 
    GROUP_CONCAT(
        IF(b.attribute = 'company', b.value, NULL)
    ) AS company_value,
    GROUP_CONCAT(
        IF(b.attribute = 'location', b.value, NULL)
    ) AS location_value,
    GROUP_CONCAT(
        IF(b.attribute = 'location', lt.location_id, NULL)
    ) AS location_id    
FROM 
records a
LEFT JOIN records b ON b.other_record_id = a.id AND b.type = 'attribute'
LEFT JOIN location_translations lt ON lt.value = b.value
WHERE a.type = 'building'
GROUP BY a.id
HAVING location_id = 2

查询＃2

SELECT temp.* FROM (
    SELECT 
        a.id, 
        GROUP_CONCAT(
            IF(b.attribute = 'company', b.value, NULL)
        ) AS company_value,
        GROUP_CONCAT(
            IF(b.attribute = 'location', b.value, NULL)
        ) AS location_value
    FROM 
    records a
    LEFT JOIN records b ON b.other_record_id = a.id AND b.type = 'attribute'
    WHERE a.type = 'building'
    GROUP BY a.id
) as temp
LEFT JOIN location_translations lt ON lt.value = temp.location_value
WHERE location_id = 2

Answer 1

在大多数情况下，使用JOIN是首选，因为它有助于优化器了解他可以使用哪些索引。在您的情况下，查询＃1看起来足够好当然，它仅在表具有索引时才有效。检查表records包含id，other_record_id，value和type列上的索引，location_translations上的表value

MySQL性能 - LEFT JOIN / HAVING vs Sub Query

1 个答案: