我试图在每次测试之前更改一些第三方类定义,以模拟不同的结果。我必须使用像javassist这样的东西,因为有时候扩展类是不可能的,因为访问修饰符。以下是我尝试使用javassist和junit组合的示例:
public class SimulatedSession extends SomeThirdParty {
private boolean isJoe = false;
public SimulatedSession(final boolean isJoe) {
this.isJoe = isJoe;
}
@Override
public void performThis() {
final ClassPool classPool = ClassPool.getDefault();
final CtClass internalClass = classPool.get("some.package.Class");
final CtMethod callMethod = internalClass.getDeclaredMethod("doThis");
if (isJoe) {
callMethod.setBody("{System.out.println(\"Joe\");}");
} else {
callMethod.setBody("{System.out.println(\"mik\");}");
}
internalClass.toClass();
}
}
@Test
public void firstTest() {
SimulatedSession toUse = new SimulatedSession(false);
// do something with this object and this flow
}
@Test
public void nextTest() {
SimulatedSession toUse = new SimulatedSession(true);
// do something with this object and this flow
}
如果我单独运行每个测试,我可以正常运行代码。当我使用单元套件运行它们时,一个接一个的测试,我得到一个“冻结类问题”。为了解决这个问题,我正在考虑这个post,但是,我必须承认我不确定如何使用不同的类池来解决问题。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
您当前的代码会尝试将同一个类加载两次到被禁止的同一个ClassLoader
,您只能为给定的ClassLoader
加载一次类。
为了让你的单元测试通过,我不得不:
ClassLoader
,该some.package.Class
将能够加载javassist.MyClass
(由ClassLoader
替换以用于测试目的)并且将以首次尝试的方式实施在父母的CL。ClassLoader
设置为上下文SimulatedSession#performThis()
。internalClass.defrost()
的代码,以便能够获取此方法创建的类实例,并调用doThis()
以阻止" 冻结类问题& #34; SimulatedSession#performThis()
,以确保通过使用ClassLoader
返回的类实例确保我有不同的输出,以确保使用的类已加载javassist.MyClass
假设我的班级package javassist;
public class MyClass {
public void doThis() {
}
}
是:
SimulatedSession#performThis()
具有修改的方法public Class<?> performThis() throws Exception {
final ClassPool classPool = ClassPool.getDefault();
final CtClass internalClass = classPool.get("javassist.MyClass");
// Prevent the "frozen class issue"
internalClass.defrost();
...
return internalClass.toClass();
}
:
// The custom CL
private URLClassLoader cl;
// The previous context CL
private ClassLoader old;
@Before
public void init() throws Exception {
// Provide the URL corresponding to the folder that contains the class
// `javassist.MyClass`
this.cl = new URLClassLoader(new URL[]{new File("target/classes").toURI().toURL()}){
protected Class<?> loadClass(String name, boolean resolve)
throws ClassNotFoundException {
try {
// Try to find the class for this CL
return findClass(name);
} catch( ClassNotFoundException e ) {
// Could not find the class so load it from the parent
return super.loadClass(name, resolve);
}
}
};
// Get the current context CL and store it into old
this.old = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
// Set the custom CL as new context CL
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(cl);
}
@After
public void restore() throws Exception {
// Restore the context CL
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(old);
// Close the custom CL
cl.close();
}
@Test
public void firstTest() throws Exception {
SimulatedSession toUse = new SimulatedSession(false);
Class<?> c = toUse.performThis();
// Invoke doThis() by reflection
Object o2 = c.newInstance();
c.getMethod("doThis").invoke(o2);
}
@Test
public void nextTest() throws Exception {
SimulatedSession toUse = new SimulatedSession(true);
Class<?> c = toUse.performThis();
// Invoke doThis() by reflection
Object o2 = c.newInstance();
c.getMethod("doThis").invoke(o2);
}
单元测试:
mik
Joe
<强>输出:强>
import numpy as np
import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn import cross_validation
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
sns.set()
x = (np.random.randint(2000, size=400)).reshape((400,1))
y = (np.random.randint(2, size=400)).reshape((400,1)).ravel()
x_train, x_test, y_train, y_test = cross_validation.train_test_split(x, y, test_size=0.4, random_state=0)
logistic_regr = LogisticRegression()
logistic_regr.fit(x_train, y_train)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.set(xlabel='x', ylabel='y')
ax.plot(x_test, logistic_regr.predict_proba(x_test), label='Logistic regr')
#ax.plot(x_test,logistic_regr.predict(x_test), label='Logistic regr')
ax.legend()
答案 1 :(得分:1)
看看retransformer。这是我用于运行测试的基于Javassist的lib。它比使用原始Javassist更简洁。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
也许是另一种方法。我们遇到了类似的问题,因为我们曾经嘲笑过依赖 - 我们无法重置它。所以我们做了以下几点:在每次测试之前,我们更换了&#39; live&#39;我们的模拟实例。测试后,我们恢复实时实例。因此,我建议您为每个测试替换第三方代码的修改实例。
@Before
public void setup()
{
this.liveBeanImpl = (LiveBean) ReflectionTools.getFieldValue(this.beanToTest, "liveBean");
ReflectionTools.setFieldValue(this.beanToTest, "liveBean", new TestStub());
}
@After
public void cleanup()
{
ReflectionTools.setFieldValue(this.beanToTest, "liveBean", his.liveBeanImpl);
}
setFieldValue如下所示:
public static void setFieldValue(Object instanceToModify, String fieldName, Object valueToSet)
{
try
{
Field declaredFieldToSet = instanceToModify.getClass().getDeclaredField(fieldName);
declaredFieldToSet.setAccessible(true);
declaredFieldToSet.set(instanceToModify, valueToSet);
declaredFieldToSet.setAccessible(false);
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
String className = exception.getClass().getCanonicalName();
String message = exception.getMessage();
String errorFormat = "\n\t'%s' caught when setting value of field '%s': %s";
String error = String.format(errorFormat, className, fieldName, message);
Assert.fail(error);
}
}
因此,如果重置每个测试的实现,可能会通过测试。你明白了吗?