我在使用IIFE与使用for循环内的正常函数调用(带参数)之间感到困惑。
让我们说这个功能是 -
function print_doc_count(i){
var str= "collection" + i.toString();
db.collection(str).count(function(err, res){
if(!err){
console.log("docs in collection: "+str+" = "+res);
}
});
}
实施例1(无IIFE) -
for(var i=1; i<=10; i++){
print_doc_count(i);
}
实施例2(使用IIFE) -
for(var i=1; i<=10; i++){
(function print_doc_count(i){
var str= "collection" + i.toString();
db.collection(str).count(function(err, res){
if(!err){
console.log("docs in collection: "+str+" = "+res);
// str needed closure, it contains the value i!
}
});
})(i);
}
我的问题是上面的例子1和例子2有什么区别,应该优先于另一个(在什么情况下)?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
正如@Kevin B在对该问题的评论中所述,示例1(没有IIFE)是一个更好的解决方案
from itertools import chain
from functools import reduce
from collections import Iterable # or from collections.abc import Iterable
import operator
from iteration_utilities import deepflatten
def nested_list_comprehension(lsts):
return [item for sublist in lsts for item in sublist]
def itertools_chain_from_iterable(lsts):
return list(chain.from_iterable(lsts))
def pythons_sum(lsts):
return sum(lsts, [])
def reduce_add(lsts):
return reduce(lambda x, y: x + y, lsts)
def pylangs_flatten(lsts):
return list(flatten(lsts))
def flatten(items):
"""Yield items from any nested iterable; see REF."""
for x in items:
if isinstance(x, Iterable) and not isinstance(x, (str, bytes)):
yield from flatten(x)
else:
yield x
def reduce_concat(lsts):
return reduce(operator.concat, lsts)
def iteration_utilities_deepflatten(lsts):
return list(deepflatten(lsts, depth=1))
from simple_benchmark import benchmark
b = benchmark(
[nested_list_comprehension, itertools_chain_from_iterable, pythons_sum, reduce_add,
pylangs_flatten, reduce_concat, iteration_utilities_deepflatten],
arguments={2**i: [[0]*5]*(2**i) for i in range(1, 13)},
argument_name='number of inner lists'
)
b.plot()