我正在使用WPF Toolkit中的CheckListBox并尝试将其绑定到我的ViewModel。除了从控件中获取所选值之外,我还希望能够通过单击按钮来重置它,这将清除任何选择。我坚持如何绑定集合中每个项目的选定或检查状态,但如果我的整个方法都关闭,我也会对此有所了解。
我创建了一个带有字符串描述符和布尔属性的简单类,我打算用它来指示每个复选框的状态......
public class DrugInfluence : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public string Impairment { get; set; }
private bool isChecked;
public bool IsChecked
{
get { return isChecked; }
set
{
if(isChecked != value)
{
isChecked = value;
OnPropertyChanged("IsChecked");
}
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private void OnPropertyChanged(string info)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(info));
}
}
}
ViewModel中的一个名为ImpairmentList的DrugInfluence对象的集合,我想绑定到CheckListBox控件的迭代...
public List<DrugInfluence> ImpairmentList
{
get
{
return impairmentList;
}
set
{
if(impairmentList != value)
{
impairmentList = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("ImpairmentList");
}
}
}
我正在使用XAML将ViewModel绑定到CheckListBox控件......
<sdk:CheckListBox Margin="6"
ItemsSource="{Binding ImpairmentList}"
DisplayMemberPath="Impairment"
SelectedMemberPath="IsChecked"
SelectedItemsOverride="{Binding SelectedImpairments, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}">
</sdk:CheckListBox>
答案 0 :(得分:0)
this是您正在使用的控件吗?如果是这样,看起来SelectedMemberPath是您要绑定到的属性。如果要以编程方式检查/取消选中,则还需要在IsChecked属性更改时引发事件。例如,
#include <complex>
#include <functional>
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/mpi.hpp>
#include <boost/mpi/operations.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/complex.hpp>
// tested with GCC 6.2.0, OpenMPI 2.0.1, boost 1.62.0
// mpic++ -lboost_mpi -lboost_serialization boost-mpi-complex.cpp
using dcomplex = std::complex<double>;
using dcplus = std::plus<dcomplex>;
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// How to pass assertions (1) to (5) below?
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// (A): documented, but fails assertions (2) and (3)
// if (2) and (3) are removed with this OPTION: segmentation fault at runtime
//BOOST_IS_MPI_DATATYPE(dcomplex)
// (B): documented, but same problems as (A)
namespace boost::mpi {
//template<> struct is_mpi_datatype<dcomplex> : boost::mpl::true_ {};
}
// (C): works, but not documented(?) and has `INTERNAL ONLY` comment in source
namespace boost::mpi {
//BOOST_MPI_DATATYPE(dcomplex, MPI_DOUBLE_COMPLEX, complex);
}
// (D): works, equivalent to (C)
// BUT if `is_mpi_complex_datatype` is specialized without `get_mpi_datatype`
// then compilation is fine with all assertions, but running yields segfault
namespace boost::mpi {
//template<> inline MPI_Datatype get_mpi_datatype<dcomplex>(const dcomplex&) {
// return MPI_DOUBLE_COMPLEX;
//}
//template<> struct is_mpi_complex_datatype<dcomplex> : boost::mpl::true_ {};
}
// optional; works as expected for assertion (4)
namespace boost::mpi {
template<> struct is_commutative<dcplus, dcomplex> : mpl::true_ {};
}
// If these assertions are removed and none of (A) to (D) is activated then
// everything works as expected, but I would like to optimize serialization
static_assert(boost::mpi::is_mpi_datatype<dcomplex>{}); // (1)
static_assert(boost::mpi::is_mpi_builtin_datatype<dcomplex>{}); // (2)
static_assert(boost::mpi::is_mpi_op<dcplus, dcomplex>{}); // (3)
static_assert(boost::mpi::is_commutative<dcplus, dcomplex>{}); // (4)
static_assert(boost::serialization::is_bitwise_serializable<dcomplex>{}); // (5)
int main() {
boost::mpi::environment env{};
boost::mpi::communicator world{};
constexpr size_t N = 4;
dcomplex data[N]{};
if(0 == world.rank()) {
for(size_t i=0; i<N; ++i) data[i] = dcomplex{double(i), 0.0};
}
if(1 == world.rank()) {
for(size_t i=0; i<N; ++i) data[i] = dcomplex{0.0, double(N+i)};
}
all_reduce(world, boost::mpi::inplace(data), N, dcplus{});
if(0 == world.rank()) {
for(auto&& x : data) std::cout << x << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
然后实现其余的INotifyPropertyChanged成员