带有Play的specs2：比“1 mustEqual 1”更好的占位符？

Question

在为Play框架编写specs2测试时，尝试执行此操作时：

object SingleTest extends PlaySpecification {
  "logging in" should {
    "fail with bad credentials" in {
      1 mustEqual 1
    }
  }
}

在scala我们被宠坏了“???”对于尚未实施的任何事情。但是，当我尝试这样做时，它会抛出这个错误：

Error:(28, 37) could not find implicit value for evidence parameter of type org.specs2.main.CommandLineAsResult[Unit]
"fail with bad credentials" in ...

有没有解决方法，或者我应该习惯“1 mustEqual 1”？

感谢。

Answer 1

您还可以使用成功和失败关键字

"logging in" should {
    "fail with bad credentials" in {
        success
    }

   "another option for login" in  {
      failure("not implemented") 
   }
}

Answer 2

根据this，您需要使用pendingUntilFixed。所以，使用你的代码：

object SingleTest extends PlaySpecification {
  "logging in" should {
    "fail with bad credentials" in {
      1 mustEqual 1
    }.pendingUntilFixed
  }
}

Answer 3

像这样使用todo：

object SingleTest extends PlaySpecification {
  "logging in" should {
    "fail with bad credentials" >> todo
  }
}