我遇到了一个使用call / cc解释Continuations的片段。在下面提供的代码片段中,call / cc调用的fn的延续是整个let块,还是call / cc下面的行?也有人可以解释为什么不提供整个let块作为延续?
#lang racket
(define resume-test-3 #f)
(define test-3 (lambda ()
; the let defines a variable i local to the lambda, and
; sets its value to 0
(let ((i 0))
;
(call/cc (lambda (k) (set! resume-test-3 k)))
;
; The next time the-continuation is called, we start here.
(displayln "I am back ")
(set! i (+ i 1))
; and return the value i
i
)
))
(test-3)
(resume-test-3)
(resume-test-3)
答案 0 :(得分:1)
call/cc
表达式的延续包括
call/cc
表达式后面的表达式。
如果我们添加(displayln "Entering let")
,我们可以看到
调用延续不会导致"输入let"
打印。
#lang racket
(define resume-test-3 #f)
(define test-3 (lambda ()
; the let defines a variable i local to the lambda, and
; sets its value to 0
(let ((i 0))
(displayln "Entering let")
;
(call/cc (lambda (k) (set! resume-test-3 k)))
;
; The next time the-continuation is called, we start here.
(displayln "I am back ")
(set! i (+ i 1))
; and return the value i
(displayln "Leaving let")
i)))
(test-3)
(resume-test-3)
(resume-test-3)
输出:
Entering let
I am back
Leaving let
1
I am back
Leaving let
2
I am back
Leaving let
3
答案 1 :(得分:1)
实现将整个事物重写为Continuation Passing Style(= CPS):
(define resume-test-3-cps #f)
(define test-3-cps
(lambda (k)
((lambda (kl i) ; this is the "let"
((lambda (tk1) (tk1 (set! resume-test-3-cps tk1)))
(lambda (not-used)
((lambda (tk2) (tk2 (displayln "I am back ")))
(lambda (not-used)
((lambda (tk3) (tk3 (set! i (+ i 1))))
(lambda (not-used)
((lambda (tk4) (tk4 (displayln "Leaving let")))
(lambda (not-used)
((lambda (tk5) (tk5 i))
kl))))))))))
k 0))) ; variables to "let"
;; top level have barriers, don't know how to simulate them
;; doing full CPS here will make an infinite loop
(test-3-cps values)
(resume-test-3-cps values)
(resume-test-3-cps values)
请注意,即使不使用call/cc
也能正常工作。多数民众赞成因为call/cc
只是一种获得CPS功能而无需在CPS中编写的方法。当你知道它是如何运作的时候,没有多少魔力。