我有一个类型为:
的Yesod应用程序data App = App
{ appSettings :: AppSettings
, appStatic :: Static
, appConnPool :: ConnectionPool
, appHttpManager :: Manager
, appLogger :: Logger
, appStripe :: forall a. ((FromJSON (StripeReturn a)), Typeable (StripeReturn a))
=> StripeConfig
-> StripeRequest a
-> IO (Either StripeError (StripeReturn a))
}
和辅助函数
stripe :: (FromJSON (StripeReturn a), Typeable (StripeReturn a))
=> StripeRequest a
-> Handler (Either StripeError (StripeReturn a))
stripe req = do
f <- appStripe <$> getYesod
c <- appStripeConfig . appSettings <$> getYesod
liftIO $ f c req
用于多个处理程序。 (appStripe
的{{1}}字段永远不会在任何处理程序中直接引用。)在App
中,除了用{填充makeFoundation
字段外,所有内容都是支架式的。来自appStripe
库的{1}}。
在我的测试中,我希望能够模拟对Stripe的调用,所以我有以下功能:
Web.Stripe.stripe
我在测试用例中使用,如:
stripe-haskell
编译并运行,但抛出错误withStripeExpecting :: (FromJSON (StripeReturn a), Typeable (StripeReturn a))
=> StripeRequest a
-> Either StripeError (StripeReturn a)
-> YesodExample App ()
-> YesodExample App ()
withStripeExpecting _expectedReq res = withStateT $ \yed -> yed {yedSite = f (yedSite yed)}
where f app = app {appStripe = mock}
mock :: Typeable (StripeReturn b)
=> StripeConfig
-> StripeRequest b
-> IO (Either StripeError (StripeReturn b))
mock _ _actualReq = do
-- assert actualReq matches expectedReq (in IO???)
return $ case cast res of
Just a -> a
Nothing -> error "Stripe return types don’t match in mock."
,表明它正在运行真正的条带IO操作而不是模拟。
如何在测试期间更改spec :: Spec
spec = withApp $ do
describe "create" $ do
it "returns a 201" $ do
-- a bunch of set-up elided
withStripeExpecting stripeReq (Right stripeRes) $ do
requestWithSubject "auth0|fake" $ do
setMethod "POST"
setUrl $ SubscriptionPlansR walletId
setRequestBody encoded
addRequestHeader (H.hContentType, "application/json")
statusIs 201
的字段,以便被测试的处理程序使用它?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
我在Google Group for Yesod上发布了对此问题的引用,并从Yesod的创始人Michael Snoyman那里收到了this response:
IIUC,您只需要覆盖代码中不同位置的字段。以脚手架网站为例,我在这里覆盖:
根据该建议,需要对Yesod.Test
模块进行一些返工,以便将模拟的控制线程连接到测试用例。这些更改已在Pull Request #1274中捕获到GitHub上的yesod repo。
使用yesod-test的修改版本,我能够用以下三行代替Michael Snoyman注意到的行:
mocks <- newEmptyMVar
let foundation' = foundation { appStripe = mockStripe mocks }
return (foundation', logWare, mocks)
我还在TestImport
模块中添加了以下支持定义:
data StripeMock = forall a. Typeable (StripeReturn a)
=> StripeMock
{ stripeReq :: StripeRequest a
, stripeRet :: Either StripeError (StripeReturn a)
}
type Mocks = MVar StripeMock
type Yex = YesodExample App Mocks
mockStripe :: (Typeable (StripeReturn b))
=> Mocks
-> StripeConfig
-> StripeRequest b
-> IO (Either StripeError (StripeReturn b))
mockStripe mocks _ _actualReq = do
(StripeMock _expectedReq res) <- takeMVar mocks
-- assert actualReq matches expectedReq (in IO???)
return $ case cast res of
Just a -> a
Nothing -> error "Stripe return types don’t match in mock."
stripeExpects :: (FromJSON (StripeReturn a), Typeable (StripeReturn a))
=> StripeRequest a
-> Either StripeError (StripeReturn a)
-> Yex ()
stripeExpects expectedReq res = do
mocks <- getMocks
putMVar mocks $ StripeMock expectedReq res
stripeExpects
帮助函数替换withStripeExpecting
,并不像withStripeExpecting
那样包装请求。
如拉动请求中所示,我正试图将此容量包含在yesod-test包中。如果我对此有所了解,我会更新这个答案。