Question

我需要检查所有定义是否包含某些特定数据。除了GroupBy返回空集合的情况外，它工作正常。

var exist = dbContext.Definitions
                     .Where(x => propertyTypeIds.Contains(x.PropertyTypeId) && x.CountryId == countryId)
                     .GroupBy(x => x.PropertyTypeId)
                     .All(...some condition...);

如何重写这样所有All会在空集合上返回false？

更新：它是一个LINQ to SQL，我想在单个调用中执行它。

UPDATE2：我认为这有效：

var exist = dbContext.Definitions
                     .Where(x => propertyTypeIds.Contains(x.PropertyTypeId) && x.CountryId == countryId)
                     .GroupBy(x => x.PropertyTypeId)
                     .Count(x => x
                        .All(...some condition...)) == propertyTypeIds.Count;

Answer 1

如果你正在使用LINQ to Objects，我只会编写自己的扩展方法。我的Edulinq project包含All的示例代码，并且调整非常简单：

public static bool AnyAndAll<TSource>(
    this IEnumerable<TSource> source,
    Func<TSource, bool> predicate)
{
    if (source == null)
    {
        throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(source));
    }
    if (predicate == null)
    {
        throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(predicate));
    }

    bool any = false;
    foreach (TSource item in source)
    {
        any = true;
        if (!predicate(item))
        {
            return false;
        }
    }
    return any;
}

这可以避免多次评估输入。

Answer 2

您可以使用Aggregate执行此操作，方法如下：

.Aggregate(new {exists = 0, matches = 0}, (a, g) =>
        new {exists = a.exists + 1, matches = a.matches + g > 10 ? 1 : 0})

（此处g > 10是我的测试）

然后是exists大于零且exists和matches具有相同值的简单逻辑。

这可以避免两次运行整个查询。

Answer 3

您可以使用DefaultIfEmpty扩展方法，并调整some condition，以便评估null至false。

var exist = definitions
    .Where(x => propertyTypeIds.Contains(x.PropertyTypeId) && x.CountryId == countryId)
    .GroupBy(x => x.PropertyTypeId)
    .DefaultIfEmpty()
    .All(...some condition...));

Answer 4

嗯，你可以分两步完成：

$ cap production ssh:doctor --trace
** Invoke production (first_time)
** Execute production
** Invoke load:defaults (first_time)
** Execute load:defaults
** Invoke bundler:map_bins (first_time)
** Execute bundler:map_bins
** Invoke deploy:set_rails_env (first_time)
** Execute deploy:set_rails_env
** Invoke deploy:set_linked_dirs (first_time)
** Execute deploy:set_linked_dirs
** Invoke deploy:set_rails_env 
** Invoke rbenv:validate (first_time)
** Execute rbenv:validate
cap aborted!
NoMethodError: undefined method `on' for main:Object
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/capistrano-rbenv-2.0.4/lib/capistrano/tasks/rbenv.rake:3:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:248:in `block in execute'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:243:in `each'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:243:in `execute'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:187:in `block in invoke_with_call_chain'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/2.3.0/monitor.rb:214:in `mon_synchronize'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:180:in `invoke_with_call_chain'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:173:in `invoke'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/capistrano-3.2.1/lib/capistrano/dsl/task_enhancements.rb:12:in `block in after'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:248:in `block in execute'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:243:in `each'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:243:in `execute'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:187:in `block in invoke_with_call_chain'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/2.3.0/monitor.rb:214:in `mon_synchronize'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:180:in `invoke_with_call_chain'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/task.rb:173:in `invoke'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/application.rb:152:in `invoke_task'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/application.rb:108:in `block (2 levels) in top_level'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/application.rb:108:in `each'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/application.rb:108:in `block in top_level'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/application.rb:117:in `run_with_threads'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/application.rb:102:in `top_level'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/application.rb:80:in `block in run'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/application.rb:178:in `standard_exception_handling'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/rake-11.2.2/lib/rake/application.rb:77:in `run'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/capistrano-3.2.1/lib/capistrano/application.rb:15:in `run'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/capistrano-3.2.1/bin/cap:3:in `<top (required)>'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/bin/cap:23:in `load'
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.3.1/bin/cap:23:in `<main>'
Tasks: TOP => rbenv:validate

Answer 5

编辑：第一个答案不起作用。

如果您稍微重新排列查询，则可以使用DefaultIfEmpty而无需更改条件：

var exist = dbContext.Definitions
                     .Where(x => propertyTypeIds.Contains(x.PropertyTypeId) 
                                  && x.CountryId == countryId)
                     .GroupBy(x => x.PropertyTypeId);

           // apply the condition to all entries, 
           // resulting in sequence of bools (or empty), 
           // to permit the next step
                     .Select(...some condition...) 

           //if seq is empty, add `false`
                     .DefaultIfEmpty(false)

           //All with identity function to apply the query and calculate result
                     .All(b => b)
         );

Answer 6

这是另一个技巧：

var exist = dbContext.Definitions
    .Where(x => propertyTypeIds.Contains(x.PropertyTypeId) && x.CountryId == countryId)
    .GroupBy(x => x.PropertyTypeId)
    .Min(some_condition ? (int?)1 : 0) == 1;

它利用上述Min<int?>方法返回的事实：

（A）null当集合为空时（B）0如果某个元素的条件不满意（C）1如果所有元素都满足条件

所以我们使用可空值比较规则来简单检查（C）的结果。

Answer 7

编写自己的扩展方法怎么样？（我很确定你会更好地命名）

public static bool NotEmptyAll<T>(
    this IEnumerable<T> collection, 
    Func<T, bool> predicate)
{
    return collection != null
        && collection.Any()
        && collection.All(predicate);
}

然后调用它而不是All

var exist = definitions.Where(
        x => propertyTypeIds.Contains(x.PropertyTypeId) && x.CountryId == countryId)
         .GroupBy(x => x.PropertyTypeId)
         .NotEmptyAll(
             ...some condition...));

Answer 8

这是All的替代方法，如果集合为空，则返回false：

var collection = Enumerable.Range(0, 0); //empty collection

collection
  .Select(IsValid)
  .DefaultIfEmpty(false)
  .All(b => b);

或作为扩展方法：

public static bool AnyAndAll<T>(IEnumerable<T> collection, Func<T, bool> predicate) =>
  collection
    .Select(predicate)
    .DefaultIfEmpty(false)
    .All(b => b);

Linq All on empty collection

8 个答案: