有谁知道为什么以下KNN R代码为不同的种子提供不同的预测? 这是奇怪的,因为K <-5,因此大部分是明确定义的。另外,浮点数不会小到数据问题的精度。 (评论:我知道测试与训练有很大不同。这只是为证明奇怪的KNN行为而创建的一个合成例子)
library(class)
train <- rbind(
c(0.0626015, 0.0530052, 0.0530052, 0.0496676, 0.0530052, 0.0626015),
c(0.0565861, 0.0569546, 0.0569546, 0.0511377, 0.0569546, 0.0565861),
c(0.0538332, 0.057786, 0.057786, 0.0506127, 0.057786, 0.0538332),
c(0.059033, 0.0541484, 0.0541484, 0.0501926, 0.0541484, 0.059033),
c(0.0587272, 0.0540445, 0.0540445, 0.0505076, 0.0540445, 0.0587272),
c(0.0578095, 0.0564349, 0.0564349, 0.0505076, 0.0564349, 0.0578095)
)
trainLabels <- c(1,
1,
0,
0,
1,
0)
test <- c(0.1923241, 0.1734074, 0.1734074, 0.1647619, 0.1734074, 0.1923241)
K <- 5
set.seed(494139)
pred <- knn(train=train, test=test, cl = trainLabels, k=K)
message("predicted: ", pred, ", seed: ", seed)
# **predicted: 1**, seed: 494139
set.seed(5371)
pred <- knn(train=train, test=test, cl = trainLabels, k=K)
message("predicted: ", pred, ", seed: ", seed)
# **predicted: 0**, seed: 5371
答案 0 :(得分:0)
knn
函数调用名为VR_knn
的基础C function(第122行),其中包含引入&#34; fuzz&#34;的步骤。或小值(epsilon,EPS)。看起来你的示例参数值可能会碰到&#34; fuzz&#34;步。有证据表明,将值舍入为4位可以得到一致性。就这样:
rm(list=ls())
library(class)
train <- rbind(
c(0.0626015, 0.0530052, 0.0530052, 0.0496676, 0.0530052, 0.0626015),
c(0.0565861, 0.0569546, 0.0569546, 0.0511377, 0.0569546, 0.0565861),
c(0.0538332, 0.057786, 0.057786, 0.0506127, 0.057786, 0.0538332),
c(0.059033, 0.0541484, 0.0541484, 0.0501926, 0.0541484, 0.059033),
c(0.0587272, 0.0540445, 0.0540445, 0.0505076, 0.0540445, 0.0587272),
c(0.0578095, 0.0564349, 0.0564349, 0.0505076, 0.0564349, 0.0578095)
)
trainLabels <- c(1,1,0,0,1,0)
test <- c(0.1923241, 0.1734074, 0.1734074, 0.1647619, 0.1734074, 0.1923241)
K <- 5
train <- round(train,4)
seed <- 494139
set.seed(seed)
pred <- knn(train=train, test=test, cl = trainLabels, k=K)
message("predicted: ", pred, ", seed: ", seed)
# predicted: 0, seed: 494139
seed <- 5371
set.seed(seed)
pred <- knn(train=train, test=test, cl = trainLabels, k=K)
message("predicted: ", pred, ", seed: ", seed)
# predicted: 0, seed: 5371