我有一个类似下面的java类
public class StaticBean {
public static String returnString(int num){
String json = "[{\"name\" : \"John Doe\", \"age\" : 30}]";
return json;
}
}
在下面的测试中,我有两个引擎实例。
执行时,我发现无法将绑定实例复制到另一个实例并将其用于在同一引擎或不同引擎中执行。即使我复制,如果我使用相同的引擎/绑定,结果也与我得到的结果不匹配。
@Test
public void testParsingStringObjects() {
Bindings b = engine.createBindings();
b.put("ndb", getBindingObject(StaticBean.class, engine));
engine.setBindings(b, ScriptContext.ENGINE_SCOPE);
String source = "print('Definition in engine instance 1');"
+ "var SysU = {};\n"
+ "SysU.returnObject = function returnObjectJS(){\n"
+ "var string = ndb.returnString(1);\n"
+ "return JSON.parse(string);\n" + "}\n"
+ "SysU.returnString = function returnStringJS(){\n"
+ "var string = ndb.returnString(1);\n"
+ "print('String returned by the java function SysU.returnString() '+string);\n"
+ "return string;\n" + "};\n"
+ "print('====================Using the same engine instance for execution====================');\n"
+ "(function (){" + "var json = {};\n"
+ "print(\"String Returned in Caller SysU.returnString(): \"+SysU.returnString());\n"
+ "print(\"Object Returned in Caller SysU.returnObject(): \"+SysU.returnObject());\n"
+ "print(\"**Stringified Object Returned in Caller JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()): \"+JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()));\n"
+ "print('Adding the object in another ( json.ext = SysU.returnObject();) ...');\n"
+ "json.ext = SysU.returnObject();\n"
+ "print(\"Added JSON object which is stringified to display JSON.stringify(json): \"+JSON.stringify(json));\n" + "})();";
try {
engine.eval(source);
Bindings oldEngineBindings = engine.getBindings(ScriptContext.ENGINE_SCOPE);
Bindings localBindings = engine2.getBindings(ScriptContext.ENGINE_SCOPE);
Bindings newBindings = engine.createBindings();
oldEngineBindings.put("fileName","oldEngine");
localBindings.put("fileName","localEngine");
newBindings.putAll(oldEngineBindings);
newBindings.putAll(localBindings);
oldEngineBindings.putAll(localBindings);
ScriptContext ctxt = new SimpleScriptContext();
ctxt.setBindings(oldEngineBindings, ScriptContext.ENGINE_SCOPE);
engine.setContext(ctxt);
engine.eval(""
+ "print('====================Using the same engine with original binding ====================');\n"
+ "(function (){" + "var json = {};\n"
+ "print(\"String Returned in Caller SysU.returnString(): \"+SysU.returnString());\n"
+ "print(\"Object Returned in Caller SysU.returnObject(): \"+SysU.returnObject());\n"
+ "print(\"**Stringified Object Returned in Caller JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()): \"+JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()));\n"
+ "print('Adding the object in another ( json.ext = SysU.returnObject();) ...');\n"
+ "json.ext = SysU.returnObject();\n"
+ "print(\"Added JSON object which is stringified to display JSON.stringify(json): \"+JSON.stringify(json));\n" + "})();");
ctxt.setBindings(newBindings, ScriptContext.ENGINE_SCOPE);
engine.setContext(ctxt);
engine.eval(""
+ "print('====================Using the same engine with copied new binding ====================');\n"
+ "(function (){" + "var json = {};\n"
+ "print(\"String Returned in Caller SysU.returnString(): \"+SysU.returnString());\n"
+ "print(\"Object Returned in Caller SysU.returnObject(): \"+SysU.returnObject());\n"
+ "print(\"**Stringified Object Returned in Caller JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()): \"+JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()));\n"
+ "print('Adding the object in another ( json.ext = SysU.returnObject();) ...');\n"
+ "json.ext = SysU.returnObject();\n"
+ "print(\"Added JSON object which is stringified to display JSON.stringify(json): \"+JSON.stringify(json));\n" + "})();",newBindings);
ctxt.setBindings(oldEngineBindings, ScriptContext.ENGINE_SCOPE);
engine2.setContext(ctxt);
engine2.eval(""
+ "print('====================Using a different engine instance with original binding ====================');\n"
+ "(function (){" + "var json = {};\n"
+ "print(\"String Returned in Caller SysU.returnString(): \"+SysU.returnString());\n"
+ "print(\"Object Returned in Caller SysU.returnObject(): \"+SysU.returnObject());\n"
+ "print(\"**Stringified Object Returned in Caller JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()): \"+JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()));\n"
+ "print('Adding the object in another ( json.ext = SysU.returnObject();) ...');\n"
+ "json.ext = SysU.returnObject();\n"
+ "print(\"Added JSON object which is stringified to display JSON.stringify(json): \"+JSON.stringify(json));\n" + "})();");
} catch (ScriptException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
这是一种公认的行为吗?还是一个bug?我应该能够复制绑定并在同一引擎或不同引擎实例的不同范围内使用它们,并产生相同的结果。
我正在测试Java8u101
运行测试时的结果。当绑定或引擎实例发生更改时, ReturnObject()函数似乎失败。
Definition in engine instance 1
====================Using the same engine instance for execution====================
String returned by the java function SysU.returnString() [{"name" : "John Doe", "age" : 30}]
String Returned in Caller SysU.returnString(): [{"name" : "John Doe", "age" : 30}]
Object Returned in Caller SysU.returnObject(): [object Object]
**Stringified Object Returned in Caller JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()): [{"name":"John Doe","age":30}]
Adding the object in another ( json.ext = SysU.returnObject();) ...
Added JSON object which is stringified to display JSON.stringify(json): {"ext":[{"name":"John Doe","age":30}]}
====================Using the same engine with original binding ====================
String returned by the java function SysU.returnString() [{"name" : "John Doe", "age" : 30}]
String Returned in Caller SysU.returnString(): [{"name" : "John Doe", "age" : 30}]
Object Returned in Caller SysU.returnObject(): [object Object]
**Stringified Object Returned in Caller JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()): [{"name":"John Doe","age":30}]
Adding the object in another ( json.ext = SysU.returnObject();) ...
Added JSON object which is stringified to display JSON.stringify(json): {"ext":[{"name":"John Doe","age":30}]}
====================Using the same engine with copied new binding ====================
String returned by the java function SysU.returnString() [{"name" : "John Doe", "age" : 30}]
String Returned in Caller SysU.returnString(): [{"name" : "John Doe", "age" : 30}]
Object Returned in Caller SysU.returnObject(): [object Object]
**Stringified Object Returned in Caller JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()): undefined
Adding the object in another ( json.ext = SysU.returnObject();) ...
Added JSON object which is stringified to display JSON.stringify(json): {}
====================Using a different engine instance with original binding ====================
String returned by the java function SysU.returnString() [{"name" : "John Doe", "age" : 30}]
String Returned in Caller SysU.returnString(): [{"name" : "John Doe", "age" : 30}]
Object Returned in Caller SysU.returnObject(): [object Object]
**Stringified Object Returned in Caller JSON.stringify(SysU.returnObject()): undefined
Adding the object in another ( json.ext = SysU.returnObject();) ...
Added JSON object which is stringified to display JSON.stringify(json): {}
编辑: -
找到此帖子https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067642。这提到了外来对象是ScriptObjectMirror的实例。我使用typeof运算符来显示在失败和成功的情况下返回的对象的类型,并且它们都是ScriptObjectMirror,但如果我在上下文中使用原始绑定对象,则stringify按预期工作。
编辑2: -
添加了一个非常简单的测试来演示上述内容。有点像上面的TLDR :)。执行下面的操作演示了绑定对象上的putAll()不能像我们期望的那样工作。
@Test
public void testParsingObjects() throws ScriptException {
String source = "var Func = {};\n"
+ "Func.getJavaScriptObject = function(){"
+ "var jsString = '{\"foo\":\"bar\"}';\n"
+ "return JSON.parse(jsString);"
+ "};";
String executor = "(function(){ "
+ "var obj = Func.getJavaScriptObject();"
+ "print(JSON.stringify(obj));"
+ " })();";
System.out.println("Executing source...");
engine.eval(source);
System.out.println("\nUsing the same binding instance and engine\n");
engine.eval(executor);
Bindings originalBinding = engine.getBindings(ScriptContext.ENGINE_SCOPE);
Bindings copiedBinding = engine.createBindings();
copiedBinding.putAll(originalBinding);
System.out.println("\nUsing the copied binding instance and engine\n");
engine.eval(executor,copiedBinding);
}
执行结果。
Executing source...
Using the same binding instance and engine
{"foo":"bar"}
Using the copied binding instance and engine
undefined
答案 0 :(得分:1)
以下是我在不同线程使用的ScriptContext实例之间使用共享编译的JavaScript代码的代码。这里的主要好处是只编译一次代码,尽管我也不需要多次从REST API流式传输代码。为简洁起见,我没有包含REST部分。
import javax.script.CompiledScript;
import javax.script.ScriptContext;
import javax.script.ScriptEngine;
import javax.script.ScriptEngineManager;
import javax.script.ScriptException;
import javax.script.SimpleScriptContext;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class ContextDemo {
static CompiledScript codeLib;
static ScriptEngine engine;
static ScriptContext context;
static List <Future<String>> taskResults;
static ExecutorService executor;
static List <Callable<String>> tasks = new ArrayList<Callable<String>> ();
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
// Initialize workers and execute
run(4);
} catch(InterruptedException | ExecutionException | ScriptException e) {
System.out.println(e.getMessage());
}
}
static void run(int workers) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException, ScriptException {
// Initialize engine and initial context
engine = new ScriptEngineManager().getEngineByName("nashorn");
context = new SimpleScriptContext();
engine.setContext(context);
// Compile a JavaScript object with a function
codeLib = ((javax.script.Compilable)engine).compile("var lib = { func1: function(n, s) { return 'thread number ' + n + ': ' + s; } };");
// Create executor with specified number of workers
executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool((int)workers);
for (int i = 0; i < workers; i++) {
tasks.add(workerLambda(i));
}
// Invoke worker pool
taskResults = executor.invokeAll(tasks);
// Iterate futures list and report results
for (int i = 0; i < workers; i++) {
Future < String > f = taskResults.get(i);
if (f.isDone()) {
System.out.println(f.get());
} else {
System.out.println("Thread " + i + " not done");
}
}
// Shutdown the executor
executor.shutdown();
}
static Callable <String> workerLambda(int n) {
int workerNum = n;
// Thread-specific script context initialization
SimpleScriptContext threadContext = new SimpleScriptContext();
threadContext.setBindings(engine.createBindings(), ScriptContext.ENGINE_SCOPE);
try {
// Inject compiled code library into thread-specific ScriptContext
codeLib.eval(threadContext);
} catch (ScriptException e1) {
System.out.println(e1.getMessage());
}
// Return the lambda
return () -> {
// Call the injected object method and return the result
return (String)engine.eval("lib.func1(" + workerNum + ", 'Hello!');", threadContext);
};
}
}
输出:
thread number 0: Hello!
thread number 1: Hello!
thread number 2: Hello!
thread number 3: Hello!
答案 1 :(得分:0)
我希望我能为此提供一个有效的解决方案,但我怀疑它可能是Nashorn的错误。作为证据,我将此链接提交给旧的JDK错误:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8023363
链接中提供了Test.java(下面)作为证据表明两个问题(Map中缺少键存在以及.putAll()之后无法执行函数到新Bindings中)&#34;不是问题&#34 ;。除了我测试相同的代码并得到不同的结果:
Test.java如下:
import javax.script.*;
import java.util.Map;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ScriptEngineManager m = new ScriptEngineManager();
ScriptEngine scriptEngine = m.getEngineByName("nashorn");
Bindings engineBindings = scriptEngine.getBindings(ScriptContext.ENGINE_SCOPE);
scriptEngine.eval("function func(x) { print('I am func ' + x); }");
// print stuff exposed in engineBindings
for (Map.Entry<?,?> entry : engineBindings.entrySet()) {
System.out.println(entry.getKey());
System.out.println(entry.getValue());
}
Bindings localBindings = scriptEngine.createBindings();
// copy all exposed from other bindings
localBindings.putAll(engineBindings);
// put additional variable
localBindings.put("event", new Object());
scriptEngine.setBindings(localBindings, ScriptContext.ENGINE_SCOPE);
scriptEngine.eval("func(event)");
}
}