我在ruby中有这段代码:
class Package
def initialize(name)
@name = name
@elements = []
end
[:type, :block].each do |bindtype|
define_method "get_#{bindtype}_by_name" do |name|
get_by_name(name, bindtype)
end
end
def get_by_name(name, bindtype=nil)
@elements.each do |element|
return if element.name == name
end
return nil
end
我已经阅读了这个问题about define_method in python,我想用Python代码在Python中实现相同的东西:
bindtypes = {"type", "block"}
class Package:
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
self.elements = list()
def get_by_name(self, name, bindtype=None):
for element in self.elements:
if element.name == name:
return element
return None
for bindtype in bindtypes:
def _in_bindtype(self, bindtype, bindtype):
Package.get_by_name(bindtype, bindtype)
setattr(Package, "get_"+bindtype+"_by_name", _in_bindtype
我这样称呼函数:
package = Package("package")
block = Block("blockName")
package.elements.append(block)
blockFound = package.get_block_by_name(block.name, block.bindtype)
但显然这不起作用,因为我没有恢复我正在搜索的元素的名称。有人可以帮助我更好地理解这个python define_method如何与我的代码一起工作吗?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
你几乎在那里;绑定bindtype
值作为函数参数的默认值,并且您想在get_by_name()
上调用self
:
for bindtype in bindtypes:
def _in_bindtype(self, name, bindtype=bindtype):
self.get_by_name(name, bindtype)
setattr(Package, "get_{}_by_name".format(bindtype), _in_bindtype)
我冒昧地使用str.format()
格式化方法名称而不是使用+
连接,我发现它更具可读性。
或者,在Python 3中,您只需创建functools.partialmethod()
objects:
from functools import partialmethod
for bindtype in bindtypes:
setattr(Package, "get_{}_by_name".format(bindtype),
partialmethod(Package.get_by_name, bindtype=bindtype))