目前我需要过滤Cursor / CursorAdapter以仅显示与ListView中的特定条件匹配的行。我不想一直重新查询数据库。我只想过滤从查询数据库中获得的Cursor。
我看到了这个问题:Filter rows from Cursor so they don't show up in ListView
但我不明白如何通过覆盖我的CursorWrapper中的“move”方法来进行过滤。一个例子很好。
非常感谢你。
答案 0 :(得分:19)
<强>更新强>
我重写了源码,我的雇主已将其作为开源软件提供:https://github.com/clover/android-filteredcursor
您不需要覆盖CursorWrapper中的所有移动方法,但由于Cursor接口的设计,您需要覆盖一堆。让我们假装您要过滤掉7行游标的第2行和第4行,创建一个扩展CursorWrapper的类并覆盖这些方法,如下所示:
private int[] filterMap = new int[] { 0, 1, 3, 5, 6 };
private int mPos = -1;
@Override
public int getCount() { return filterMap.length }
@Override
public boolean moveToPosition(int position) {
// Make sure position isn't past the end of the cursor
final int count = getCount();
if (position >= count) {
mPos = count;
return false;
}
// Make sure position isn't before the beginning of the cursor
if (position < 0) {
mPos = -1;
return false;
}
final int realPosition = filterMap[position];
// When moving to an empty position, just pretend we did it
boolean moved = realPosition == -1 ? true : super.moveToPosition(realPosition);
if (moved) {
mPos = position;
} else {
mPos = -1;
}
return moved;
}
@Override
public final boolean move(int offset) {
return moveToPosition(mPos + offset);
}
@Override
public final boolean moveToFirst() {
return moveToPosition(0);
}
@Override
public final boolean moveToLast() {
return moveToPosition(getCount() - 1);
}
@Override
public final boolean moveToNext() {
return moveToPosition(mPos + 1);
}
@Override
public final boolean moveToPrevious() {
return moveToPosition(mPos - 1);
}
@Override
public final boolean isFirst() {
return mPos == 0 && getCount() != 0;
}
@Override
public final boolean isLast() {
int cnt = getCount();
return mPos == (cnt - 1) && cnt != 0;
}
@Override
public final boolean isBeforeFirst() {
if (getCount() == 0) {
return true;
}
return mPos == -1;
}
@Override
public final boolean isAfterLast() {
if (getCount() == 0) {
return true;
}
return mPos == getCount();
}
@Override
public int getPosition() {
return mPos;
}
现在有趣的部分是创建filterMap,这取决于你。
答案 1 :(得分:1)
我正在寻找类似的东西,在我的情况下,我想根据字符串比较过滤项目。我找到了这个要点https://gist.github.com/ramzes642/5400792,除非你开始玩光标的位置,否则它会正常工作。所以我发现satur9nine的答案,他的一个尊重位置api,但只需要根据光标进行过滤调整,所以我合并了两个。您可以更改代码以适应它:https://gist.github.com/rfreitas/ab46edbdc41500b20357
import java.text.Normalizer;
import android.database.Cursor;
import android.database.CursorWrapper;
import android.util.Log;
//by Ricardo derfreitas@gmail.com
//ref: https://gist.github.com/ramzes642/5400792 (the position retrieved is not correct)
//ref: http://stackoverflow.com/a/7343721/689223 (doesn't do string filtering)
//the two code bases were merged to get the best of both worlds
//also added was an option to remove accents from UTF strings
public class FilterCursorWrapper extends CursorWrapper {
private static final String TAG = FilterCursorWrapper.class.getSimpleName();
private String filter;
private int column;
private int[] filterMap;
private int mPos = -1;
private int mCount = 0;
public FilterCursorWrapper(Cursor cursor,String filter,int column) {
super(cursor);
this.filter = deAccent(filter).toLowerCase();
Log.d(TAG, "filter:"+this.filter);
this.column = column;
int count = super.getCount();
if (!this.filter.isEmpty()) {
this.filterMap = new int[count];
int filteredCount = 0;
for (int i=0;i<count;i++) {
super.moveToPosition(i);
if (deAccent(this.getString(this.column)).toLowerCase().contains(this.filter)){
this.filterMap[filteredCount] = i;
filteredCount++;
}
}
this.mCount = filteredCount;
} else {
this.filterMap = new int[count];
this.mCount = count;
for (int i=0;i<count;i++) {
this.filterMap[i] = i;
}
}
this.moveToFirst();
}
public int getCount() { return this.mCount; }
@Override
public boolean moveToPosition(int position) {
Log.d(TAG,"moveToPosition:"+position);
// Make sure position isn't past the end of the cursor
final int count = getCount();
if (position >= count) {
mPos = count;
return false;
}
// Make sure position isn't before the beginning of the cursor
if (position < 0) {
mPos = -1;
return false;
}
final int realPosition = filterMap[position];
// When moving to an empty position, just pretend we did it
boolean moved = realPosition == -1 ? true : super.moveToPosition(realPosition);
if (moved) {
mPos = position;
} else {
mPos = -1;
}
Log.d(TAG,"end moveToPosition:"+position);
return moved;
}
@Override
public final boolean move(int offset) {
return moveToPosition(mPos + offset);
}
@Override
public final boolean moveToFirst() {
return moveToPosition(0);
}
@Override
public final boolean moveToLast() {
return moveToPosition(getCount() - 1);
}
@Override
public final boolean moveToNext() {
return moveToPosition(mPos + 1);
}
@Override
public final boolean moveToPrevious() {
return moveToPosition(mPos - 1);
}
@Override
public final boolean isFirst() {
return mPos == 0 && getCount() != 0;
}
@Override
public final boolean isLast() {
int cnt = getCount();
return mPos == (cnt - 1) && cnt != 0;
}
@Override
public final boolean isBeforeFirst() {
if (getCount() == 0) {
return true;
}
return mPos == -1;
}
@Override
public final boolean isAfterLast() {
if (getCount() == 0) {
return true;
}
return mPos == getCount();
}
@Override
public int getPosition() {
return mPos;
}
//added by Ricardo
//ref: http://stackoverflow.com/a/22612054/689223
//other: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8523631/remove-accents-from-string
//other: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15190656/easy-way-to-remove-utf-8-accents-from-a-string
public static String deAccent(String str) {
//return StringUtils.stripAccents(str);//this method from apache.commons respects chinese characters, but it's slower than flattenToAscii
return flattenToAscii(str);
}
//ref: http://stackoverflow.com/a/15191508/689223
//this is the fastest method using the normalizer found yet, the ones using Regex are too slow
public static String flattenToAscii(String string) {
char[] out = new char[string.length()];
string = Normalizer.normalize(string, Normalizer.Form.NFD);
int j = 0;
for (int i = 0, n = string.length(); i < n; ++i) {
char c = string.charAt(i);
int type = Character.getType(c);
if (type != Character.NON_SPACING_MARK){
out[j] = c;
j++;
}
}
return new String(out);
}
}
答案 2 :(得分:0)
我已经将光标1790条目的迭代与光标中的查询与REGEXP进行了比较,它是1分15秒,而不是15秒。
使用REGEXP - 速度更快。