我有对象集合,其中每个对象包含其他对象集合。所有我想以某种方式修改我的原始对象集合,不应分配额外的内存。一切都应该在记忆中发生。
我正在寻找一些模板化的Action或Func,以便通过声明和功能方法的混合,不会形成新的集合,并且在内存中我的原始集合也会被修改。
以下是集合的层次结构
public class ConsignmentAddress
{
public int ConsignmentAddressId { get; set; }
public int AddressTypeId { get; set; }
public string Street { get; set; }
public string Town { get; set; }
public string ZipCode { get; set; }
public int ConsignmentId { get; set; }
}
public class ConsignmentLine
{
public int ConsignmentLineId { get; set; }
public int PackagingId { get; set; }
public double Amount { get; set; }
public double Weight { get; set; }
public int ConsignmentId { get; set; }
public int? PackagingAidId { get; set; }
}
public class PackagingAid
{
public int PackagingAidId { get; set; }
public int ConsignmentId { get; set; }
public int PackagingId { get; set; }
public double Quantity { get; set; }
}
public class Consignment
{
public int ConsignmentId { get; set; }
public int ClientSubsidiaryId { get; set; }
public int ForwarderId { get; set; }
public int Sourcepaty { get; set; }
public int ParentId { get; set; }
public int ProductId { get; set; }
public ICollection<PackagingAid> PackagingAids { get; set; }
public ICollection<ConsignmentLine> ConsignmentLines { get; set; }
public ICollection<ConsignmentAddress> ConsignmentAddresses { get; set; }
public Consignment()
{
PackagingAids = new List<PackagingAid>();
ConsignmentLines = new List<ConsignmentLine>();
ConsignmentAddresses = new List<ConsignmentAddress>();
}
}
我的目的是编写通用扩展方法,该方法应该对我上面提到的层次结构中的所有类型的对象进行操作。
public static class ConsignmentExtension
{
public static T Set<T>(this T input, Action<T> updater)
{
updater(input);
return input;
}
}
我的客户代码首先获得列表中10000个对象的列表,并重置少量属性(寄售,寄售地址为相应的寄售,相应寄售的寄售线和相应寄售的包装)
我写的Foreach方法运行良好但我希望对同一个集合采用模板化和高效的方法。
consignments.ForEach(cons =>
{
cons.ConsignmentId = -1;
cons.ConsignmentAddresses.ToList().ForEach(address =>
{
address.ConsignmentId = -1;
address.ConsignmentAddressId = -1;
});
cons.ConsignmentLines.ToList().ForEach(line =>
{
line.ConsignmentId = -1;
line.ConsignmentLineId = -1;
line.PackagingAidId = -1;
});
cons.PackagingAids.ToList().ForEach(aid =>
{
aid.ConsignmentId = -1;
aid.PackagingAidId = -1;
});
});
但我正在寻找像陈述式风格的东西。
var updatedConsignments = from consignment in consignments
select consignment.Set<Consignment>(con =>
{
con.ConsignmentId = -1;
con.ConsignmentAddresses.Set<dynamic>(address => { address.ConsignmentId = -1; address.ConsignmentAddressId = -1; });
con.ConsignmentLines.Set<dynamic>(line => { line.PackagingAidId = -1; line.ConsignmentId = -1;line.ConsignmentLineId = -1; });
con.PackagingAids.Set<dynamic>(aid => { aid.ConsignmentId = -1; aid.PackagingAidId = -1; });
});
这有可能吗? 提前谢谢。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
这可以写成
public static class ConsignmentExtension
{
public static IEnumerable<dynamic> SetEach(this IEnumerable<dynamic> input, Action<dynamic> updater)
{
foreach (var item in input)
{
updater(item);
}
return input;
}
}
用法:
var addresses = new []
{
new ConsignmentAddress()
};
addresses.SetEach(a => a.ConsignmentId = -1);
var packages = new []
{
new PackagingAid()
};
packages.SetEach(p => p.PackagingAidId = -1);