红宝石中的范围非常酷。 我最终得到了这样的数组:
geneRanges = [(234..25), (500..510), (1640..1653)]
随后必须删除它们的一部分。为此我:
genePositions = geneRanges.collect {|range| range.entries }.flatten
=> [500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 1640, 1641, 1642, 1643, 1644, 1645, 1646, 1647, 1648, 1649, 1650, 1651, 1652, 1653]
他们受到操纵,因此有些数字被排除在外,其他数字可能会被添加。我最终可能会这样:
[505, 506, 507, 600, 601, 602, 603, 1643, 1644, 1645, 1646, 1647, 1648, 1649, 1650, 1651, 1652, 1653, 1654]
如何将其转换回紧凑的范围数组?似乎反函数应该存在?我希望它会返回这样的东西:
[(505..507), (600..603), (1643..1654)]
谢谢!
答案 0 :(得分:14)
(新的和改进的。在冰箱里保鲜最多两周!):
a = [1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 20, 20, 4]
ranges = a.sort.uniq.inject([]) do |spans, n|
if spans.empty? || spans.last.last != n - 1
spans + [n..n]
else
spans[0..-2] + [spans.last.first..n]
end
end
p ranges # [1..4, 10..11, 20..20]
答案 1 :(得分:8)
功能性,非常易读的解决方案:
(a[0,1]+a.each_cons(2).reject{|i,j| j-i==1}.flatten+a[-1,1]).
each_slice(2).map{|i,j| i..j}
还不错:
class Array
# splits array to sub-arrays wherever two adjacent elements satisfy a condition
def split_by
each_cons(2).inject([[first]]){|a, (i, j)|
a.push([]) if yield(i, j)
a.last.push j
a
}
end
# uses split_by to split array to subarrays with consecutive elements, then convert to range
def to_range
split_by{|i,j| j-i!=1}.map{|a| a.first..a.last}
end
end
[505, 506, 507, 600, 1647, 1648, 1649, 1650, 1651, 1654].split_by{|i,j| j-i!=1}
#=> [[505, 506, 507], [600], [1647, 1648, 1649, 1650, 1651], [1654]]
[505, 506, 507, 600, 1647, 1648, 1649, 1650, 1651, 1654].to_range
#=> [505..507, 600..600, 1647..1651, 1654..1654]
答案 2 :(得分:5)
这是韦恩康拉德算法的一个简单的小方法,只需稍加调整即可使其适用于其他类型的范围,例如:字母
def array_to_ranges(a)
ranges = a.sort.uniq.inject([]) do |spans, n|
if spans.empty? || spans.last.last.succ != n
spans + [n..n]
else
spans[0..-2] + [spans.last.first..n]
end
end
ranges
end
[
[1..3, 10..11, 20..20, 4..4],
[ "a".."c", "f".."h", "x".."z"],
["aa".."af"]
].each do |arange|
p arange
p array = arange.collect {|range| range.to_a}.flatten
p array_to_ranges(array)
end
执行此操作的结果是
[1..3, 10..11, 20..20, 4..4] [1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 20, 4] [1..4, 10..11, 20..20] ["a".."c", "f".."h", "x".."z"] ["a", "b", "c", "f", "g", "h", "x", "y", "z"] ["a".."c", "f".."h", "x".."z"] ["aa".."af"] ["aa", "ab", "ac", "ad", "ae", "af"] ["aa".."af"]
答案 3 :(得分:5)
这是一个答案(改编自this code),其速度是此处发布的其他代码的两倍多。此外,只有这个答案和the one by @Steve处理非整数数组。
class Array
def to_ranges
return [] if empty?
[].tap do |ranges|
init,last = first
each do |o|
if last && o != last.succ
ranges << (init..last)
init = o
end
last = o
end
ranges << (init..last)
end
end
end
以下是基准测试结果:
user system total real
steve 1.107000 0.000000 1.107000 ( 1.106221)
wayne 1.092000 0.000000 1.092000 ( 1.099220)
user229426 0.531000 0.000000 0.531000 ( 0.523104)
mladen1 0.780000 0.000000 0.780000 ( 0.774154)
mladen2 0.780000 0.000000 0.780000 ( 0.792159)
phrogz 0.218000 0.000000 0.218000 ( 0.220044)
所有基准代码都经过调整,可以移除sort.uniq
进行公平比较。
答案 4 :(得分:1)
我从来没有在Ruby语言中看到过这样做的东西,但是这里有一些代码可以帮助你自己做:
答案 5 :(得分:1)
ar=[505, 506, 507, 600, 1647, 1648, 1649, 1650, 1651, 1654]
def to_range(a)
s=a[0]
a.each_cons(2) do |a|
if a[1]-a[0]!=1
p s .. a[0]
s=a[1]
end
end
left=a.index(s)
p a[left..-1][0]..a[left..-1][-1]
end
to_range(ar)
答案 6 :(得分:0)
array = [505, 506, 507, 600, 601, 602, 603, 1643, 1644, 1645, 1646, 1647, 1648, 1649, 1650, 1651, 1652, 1653, 1654]
array.inject([]){ |a, e| a[-1] && a[-1].last && a[-1].last == e-1 ? a[-1] = (a[-1].first..e) : a << (e..e); a }
#=> [505..507, 600..603, 1643..1654]
对于未排序的数组,您可以预先分配它:
array.sort!.uniq!