我们最近开始使用ServiceStack AutoQuery。这是一个很好的功能,我们非常喜欢它。我们有这样的表结构(缩小版本以便于阅读):
Salary [Id (PK), ManagerId (FK)]
Manager [Id (PK), DepartmentId (FK)] /* Manager is like Employee table even thought it's named Manager */
Department [Id (PK), ActiveManagerId (FK)] /* The FK ActiveManagerId is supposed to be a shortcut, it's Nullable. */
所以理论上我们可以像这样加入
Salary -> Manager via Salary.ManagerId = Manager.Id
Manager -> Department via Manager.DepartmentId = Department.Id
Department -> Manager via Department.ActiveManagerId = Manager.Id
但是在这种特定情况下,如果我们通过Department.ActiveManagerId = Manager.Id从Department加入Manager,将无法生成正确的结果,因为Department.ActiveManagerId是一个快捷方式,专为其他场景设计。
所以当我像这样定义AutoQuery时
public class SalaryQuery : QueryBase<Salary, SalaryQueryResult>,
ILeftJoin<Salary, Manager, Department>
下面的SQL是由AutoQuery生成的,从ServiceStack AutoQuery的角度来看是正确的。
select s.Id
, d.Id
from Salary s
left join
Manager m
on s.ManagerId = m.Id
left join
Department d
on d.ActiveManagerId = m.Id /* should NOT use shortcut: Department -> Manager via Department.ActiveManagerId = Manager.Id */
但我们希望能够生成类似于
的SQLselect s.Id
, d.Id
from Salary s
left join
Manager m
on s.ManagerId = m.id
left join
Department d
on d.Id = m.DepartmentId /* should use the desired FK: Manager -> Department via Manager.DepartmentId = Department.Id */
答案 0 :(得分:3)
如果你想要不同的JOIN行为,你需要在Custom AutoQuery implementation中添加自定义LEFT JOIN,例如:
//AutoQuery DTO
public class SalaryQuery : QueryDb<Salary,SalaryQueryResult>, ILeftJoin<Salary,Manager>
//Implementation
public class MyServices : Service
{
public IAutoQueryDb AutoQuery { get; set; }
public object Any(SalaryQuery query)
{
var q = AutoQuery.CreateQuery(query, base.Request)
.LeftJoin<Manager, Department>((m, d) => d.Id == m.DepartmentId);
return AutoQuery.Execute(query, q);
}
}
注意:从v4.0.56开始,
QueryBase<T>
已deprecated and renamed to QueryDb。