我听了这个演讲 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdmkXL7XikQ&feature=youtu.be&t=274
并且我应该避免使用create方法创建一个Observable,因为它不会自动处理取消订阅和背压,但我找不到在下面的代码中使用的替代方法。
compositeSubscription.add(
Observable.create(new Observable.OnSubscribe<DTOCompaniesCallback>() {
@Override
public void call(final Subscriber<? super DTOCompaniesCallback> subscriber) {
modelTrainStrike.getCompaniesFromServer(new CompaniesCallback() {
@Override
public void onResult(DTOCompaniesCallback dtoCompaniesCallback) {
try {
if (!subscriber.isUnsubscribed()) {
subscriber.onNext(dtoCompaniesCallback);
subscriber.onCompleted();
}
} catch (Exception e) {
if (!subscriber.isUnsubscribed()) {
subscriber.onError(e);
}
}
}
});
}
})
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.subscribe(new Action1<DTOCompaniesCallback>() {
@Override
public void call(DTOCompaniesCallback dtoCompaniesCallback) {
Log.i("TAG", "onResult: " + dtoCompaniesCallback.getCompaniesList().size());
}
}, new Action1<Throwable>() {
@Override
public void call(Throwable throwable) {
throw new OnErrorNotImplementedException("Source!", throwable);
}
})
);
我在OnDestroy方法中调用了CompositeSubscription
@Override
public void onDestroy() {
if (compositeSubscription != null) {
compositeSubscription.clear();
}
}
您是否看到了我可以在此处使用的创建方法的替代方法? 您是否看到任何潜在的危险或这种方法是否安全? 感谢
答案 0 :(得分:6)
您可以使用defer + AsyncSubject:
Observable.defer(() -> {
AsyncSubject<DTOCompaniesCallback> async = AsyncSubject.create();
modelTrainStrike.getCompaniesFromServer(v -> {
async.onNext(v);
async.onComplete();
});
return async;
})
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
...
如果getCompaniesFromServer
支持取消,您可以:
Observable.defer(() -> {
AsyncSubject<DTOCompaniesCallback> async = AsyncSubject.create();
Closeable c = modelTrainStrike.getCompaniesFromServer(v -> {
async.onNext(v);
async.onComplete();
});
return async.doOnUnsubscribe(() -> {
try { c.close(); } catch (IOException ex) { }
});
})