我们在C中编写了一套代码,它将dir中的Matlab数据文件(.mat)作为输入,它还调用GSL函数来搜索多项式的根,并生成随机数。我们正在研究OSX。我们使用Valgrind
来检查是否存在任何内存泄漏,因为我们在代码中使用了大量malloc
和free
。它确实帮助我们在很多地方找到了内存泄漏。但是,还有一个我们无法解决的问题。函数listfileswext
中存在问题(它在名为.mat
的子例程中列出具有给定扩展名的目录中的所有文件,即maxphaseutils.c
:
char ** listfileswext (const char *ext, const char *dirName, size_t *nFiles, size_t *maxFileNameLen)
{
/*printf("------- %s -------\n",ext);
printf("Extension string length %zu\n",strlen(ext));*/
char *pattern = (char *)malloc((3+strlen(ext))*sizeof(char));
DIR *dp;
struct dirent *ep;
char **fileList;
size_t lpc;
pattern[0] = '*';
pattern[1] = '.';
pattern[2] = '\0';
strcat(pattern,ext);
/*printf("Pattern %s\n",pattern);*/
/* Step 1: Count the number of files with the required
extension.
*/
size_t countValidFiles = 0;
dp = opendir(dirName);
if (dp != NULL){
while ((ep = readdir(dp))){
/*printf("Checking file %s\n",ep->d_name);*/
if(!fnmatch(pattern, ep->d_name, (FNM_FILE_NAME|FNM_PERIOD))){
/* Match. Increment counter */
/*printf("found match with pattern %s\n",pattern);*/
countValidFiles++;
}
}
(void) closedir (dp);
/*
Apparently, there is no need to free ep as it is declared to be 'static' in the readdir function
*/
}
else{
printf ("Couldn't open the directory %s\n",dirName);
free(pattern);
return NULL;
}
*nFiles = countValidFiles;
/* Step 2: Create storage for list of filenames */
fileList = (char **)malloc(countValidFiles*sizeof(char *));
/* Can't find a better way than to repeat the whole loop again */
countValidFiles = 0;
dp = opendir(dirName);
if (dp != NULL){
while ((ep = readdir(dp))){
if(!fnmatch(pattern, ep->d_name, (FNM_FILE_NAME|FNM_PERIOD))){
fileList[countValidFiles] = (char *)malloc(strlen(ep->d_name)*sizeof(char));
strcpy(fileList[countValidFiles],ep->d_name);
/* Match. Increment counter */
countValidFiles++;
}
}
(void) closedir (dp);
}
else{
printf ("Couldn't open the directory %s\n",dirName);
return NULL;
}
/*Find longest filename */
size_t fileNameLen;
*maxFileNameLen = 0;
size_t lpc1;
for (lpc1 = 0; lpc1 < *nFiles; lpc1++){
fileNameLen = strlen(fileList[lpc1]);
if ( fileNameLen > *maxFileNameLen)
*maxFileNameLen = fileNameLen;
}
/* Wrap up */
free(pattern);
return fileList;
}
在此函数中,变量fileList
被称为
char **inputFileList;
size_t nInputFiles, maxFileNameLen;
inputFileList = listfileswext("mat", simDataDir, &nInputFiles, &maxFileNameLen);
然后释放
for(lpc1 = 0; lpc1 < nInputFiles; lpc1++){
/* Free up dynamically allocated memory for file list*/
free(inputFileList[lpc1]);
}
/* Free up dynamically allocated memory */
free(inputFileList);
在main函数中如上所示。正如您所看到的那样,fileList
在main中被释放为inputFileList
而不是在已分配的函数(listfileswext
)中释放。我们认为没关系。运行Valgrind
后,会显示
==8643== Invalid write of size 8
==8643== at 0x101921031: _platform_memmove$VARIANT$Unknown (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib)
==8643== by 0x1016E33AD: stpcpy (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==8643== by 0x101755F96: __strcpy_chk (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==8643== by 0x1000044B2: listfileswext (maxphaseutils.c:153)
==8643== by 0x100005FBD: main (perfeval_snglproc.c:41)
==8643== Address 0x104c6381d is 13 bytes inside a block of size 20 alloc'd
==8643== at 0x100010EBB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:303)
==8643== by 0x10000447C: listfileswext (maxphaseutils.c:152)
==8643== by 0x100005FBD: main (c:41)
和
==8643== Invalid read of size 8
==8643== at 0x101921040: _platform_memmove$VARIANT$Unknown (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib)
==8643== by 0x101756127: __strcat_chk (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==8643== by 0x1000060CE: main (perfeval_snglproc.c:67)
==8643== Address 0x104c63224 is 4 bytes inside a block of size 11 alloc'd
==8643== at 0x100010EBB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:303)
==8643== by 0x10000447C: listfileswext (maxphaseutils.c:152)
==8643== by 0x100005FBD: main (perfeval_snglproc.c:41)
这里perfeval_snglproc.c
是主要的。此外,还有很多工作人员如下所示,这些工作与我们制作的功能无关(我们可能无法控制这些系统文件):
==8643== 168 bytes in 7 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 657 of 1,081
==8643== at 0x10001178B: malloc_zone_calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:717)
==8643== by 0x1019C737C: NXHashInsert (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==8643== by 0x1019C746F: _NXHashRehashToCapacity (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==8643== by 0x1019C73B9: NXHashInsert (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==8643== by 0x1019D6687: realizeClass(objc_class*) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==8643== by 0x1019D5B53: realizeClass(objc_class*) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==8643== by 0x1019CA38D: look_up_class (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==8643== by 0x1019CA1B9: objc_getFutureClass (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==8643== by 0x101D51D3F: __CFInitialize (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
==8643== by 0x7FFF5FC12BC7: ImageLoaderMachO::doImageInit(ImageLoader::LinkContext const&) (in /usr/lib/dyld)
==8643== by 0x7FFF5FC12E8C: ImageLoaderMachO::doInitialization(ImageLoader::LinkContext const&) (in /usr/lib/dyld)
==8643== by 0x7FFF5FC0F890: ImageLoader::recursiveInitialization(ImageLoader::LinkContext const&, unsigned int, ImageLoader::InitializerTimingList&, ImageLoader::UninitedUpwards&) (in /usr/lib/dyld)
==8643==
==8643== 168 (32 direct, 136 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 658 of 1,081
==8643== at 0x10001117C: malloc_zone_malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:305)
==8643== by 0x101D6FF79: CFUniCharGetUnicodePropertyDataForPlane (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
==8643== by 0x101D6FEBE: CFUniCharGetNumberOfPlanesForUnicodePropertyData (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
==8643== by 0x101D6F9A3: __CFUniCharLoadDecompositionTable (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
==8643== by 0x101D6F048: CFUniCharDecompose (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
==8643== by 0x101D681CE: CFStringGetFileSystemRepresentation (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
==8643== by 0x101E91929: _CFURLCreateWithFileSystemPath (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
==8643== by 0x101D693D9: _CFBundleCopyBundleURLForExecutableURL (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
==8643== by 0x101D63DE4: _CFBundleGetMainBundleAlreadyLocked (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
==8643== by 0x101D63D5A: CFBundleGetMainBundle (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
==8643== by 0x101D8C0A7: _CFPrefsGetCacheStringForBundleID (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
==8643== by 0x101EDADC8: __50+[CFPrefsSearchListSource withSnapshotSearchList:]_block_invoke (in /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation)
请帮忙!提前谢谢!
答案 0 :(得分:2)
根据this,泄漏不是由您的程序引起的,而是由系统库引起的。
对于错误,当为c-string分配空间时,你需要为尾随零空间,所以改变
fileList[countValidFiles] = (char *)malloc(strlen(ep->d_name)*sizeof(char));
到
fileList[countValidFiles] = (char *)malloc((strlen(ep->d_name) + 1)*sizeof(char));