我试图了解何时使用ref
和&
以及何时可以互换。在另一个代码示例中,我使用了错误的&
,但是做了一些测试,我发现这有时会起作用。以此代码为例:
fn main() {
let test = 5;
let ref testRef = test;
println!("&test as *const _ {:?}", &test as *const _);
println!("&testRef as *const _ {:?}", &testRef as *const _);
println!("&*testRef as *const _ {:?}", &*testRef as *const _);
println!("&&&&&&&&&&testRef as *const _ {:?}", &&&&&&&&&&testRef as *const _);
println!("&&&&&testRef as *const _ {:?}", &&&&&testRef as *const _);
println!("&&&&&&*testRef as *const _ {:?}", &&&&&&*testRef as *const _);
println!("&&&&&&&&&&testRef {:?}", &&&&&&&&&&testRef);
println!("&&&&&testRef {:?}", &&&&&testRef);
println!("&&&&&&*testRef {:?}", &&&&&&*testRef);
}
外壳:
&test as *const _ 0x7fffac2d5be4 <- this no problem I understand
&testRef as *const _ 0x7fffac2d5bd8 <- this no problem I understand
&*testRef as *const _ 0x7fffac2d5be4 <- this no problem I understand
&&&&&&&&&&testRef as *const _ 0x7fffac2d5998 <- why this found and
&&&&&testRef as *const _ 0x7fffac2d58f0 <- It changes every
&&&&&&*testRef as *const _ 0x7fffac2d5840 <- time you add &
&&&&&&&&&&testRef 5
&&&&&testRef 5
&&&&&&*testRef 5
答案 0 :(得分:7)
当你在一个不仅仅是变量路径的表达式上使用&
运算符时,Rust实际上会创建一个临时的未命名变量,为它赋予表达式的结果,并为您提供对临时变量的引用。所以如果你做&&test
,Rust会创建一个临时的(让我们称之为tmp
):
let tmp = &test;
然后Rust会给你&tmp
,显然它有一个新的内存位置。