这是一个主要是概念性的问题。我有一些类表示从(自定义)TextArea控件中删除文本的算法。我想测试它 - 当然是算法;)。我担心我的测试方法缺乏可读性:
[TestCase(new[] { "some text asdf" }, 5, 0, 9, 0, "some asdf", new int[0])]
[TestCase(new[] { "some text", "", "totally unimportant texttext that stays" }, 0, 0, 24, 2, "text that stays", new[] { 0, 1, 2 })]
public void ShouldRemoveSelectedText(string[] lines, int colStart, int lineStart, int colEnd, int lineEnd, string notRemovedText, int[] expectedRemovedLines) {
var newLines = algorithm.RemoveLines(lines, new TextPositionsPair {
StartPosition = new TextPosition(column: colStart, line: lineStart),
EndPosition = new TextPosition(column: colEnd, line: lineEnd)
});
Assert.That(newLines.LinesToChange.First().Value, Is.EqualTo(notRemovedText));
CollectionAssert.AreEqual(expectedRemovedLines, newLines.LinesToRemove.OrderBy(key => key));
}
你可以看到它是一个非常简单的测试。我提供了IEnumerable
string
TestCase
和选择区域的算法,但是很难看到 - 乍一看 - Array
(
[1] => Array
(
[num_copy] => 1
[dwg_rev] => B
[dwg_id] => 1
)
[2] => Array
(
[num_copy] => 1
[dwg_rev] => B
[dwg_id] => 2
)
)
Array
(
[1] => Array
(
[client_id] => 1
)
)
参数在哪里。我在想 - 是否有一个更清洁的"这样做的方式?
旁注:我的测试就像这个一样简单,但必须提供更多的参数......
答案 0 :(得分:1)
一种简单的方法是每个案例只使用更多行......
[TestCase(new [] { "some text asdf" },
5, 0, 9, 0,
"some asdf",
new int[0])]
[TestCase(new [] { "some text", "", "totally unimportant texttext that stays" },
0, 0, 24, 2,
"text that stays",
new [] {0, 1, 2})]
public void ShouldRemoveSelectedText(...
或者,你可以使用TestCaseSource,引用fixture类中的静态数组......
TestCaseData[] MySource = {
new TestCaseData(new [] { "some text asdf" },
5, 0, 9, 0,
"some asdf",
new int[0]),
new TestCaseData(new [] { "some text", "", "totally unimportant texttext that stays" },
0, 0, 24, 2
"text that stays",
new [] { 0, 1, 2})};
[TestCaseSource("MySource")]
public void ShouldRemoveSelectedText(..
这些是我可以看到的最佳选项,而不会更改测试的参数,如果它是我的代码,那就是我实际会做的。
我创建了一个封装文本缓冲区的对象,另一个用于选择。我在这里展示课程,但它们可能是结构......
class TextBuffer
{
public string[] Lines;
public Selection Selection;
...
}
class Selection
{
public int FromLine;
public int FromCol;
public int ToLine;
public int ToCol;
...
}
然后我根据这些测试原语重写测试,使其更容易阅读。