最近我想在我的脚本中添加一个简单的进度条,我使用tqdm
,但令我感到困惑的是,当我在IDLE或cmd中时,输出是不同的
例如这个
from tqdm import tqdm
import time
def test():
for i in tqdm( range(100) ):
time.sleep(0.1)
在cmd中给出预期的输出
30%|███ | 30/100 [00:03<00:07, 9.14it/s]
但在IDLE中输出就像这样
0%| | 0/100 [00:00<?, ?it/s]
1%|1 | 1/100 [00:00<00:10, 9.14it/s]
2%|2 | 2/100 [00:00<00:11, 8.77it/s]
3%|3 | 3/100 [00:00<00:11, 8.52it/s]
4%|4 | 4/100 [00:00<00:11, 8.36it/s]
5%|5 | 5/100 [00:00<00:11, 8.25it/s]
6%|6 | 6/100 [00:00<00:11, 8.17it/s]
7%|7 | 7/100 [00:00<00:11, 8.12it/s]
8%|8 | 8/100 [00:00<00:11, 8.08it/s]
9%|9 | 9/100 [00:01<00:11, 8.06it/s]
10%|# | 10/100 [00:01<00:11, 8.04it/s]
11%|#1 | 11/100 [00:01<00:11, 8.03it/s]
12%|#2 | 12/100 [00:01<00:10, 8.02it/s]
13%|#3 | 13/100 [00:01<00:10, 8.01it/s]
14%|#4 | 14/100 [00:01<00:10, 8.01it/s]
15%|#5 | 15/100 [00:01<00:10, 8.01it/s]
16%|#6 | 16/100 [00:01<00:10, 8.00it/s]
17%|#7 | 17/100 [00:02<00:10, 8.00it/s]
18%|#8 | 18/100 [00:02<00:10, 8.00it/s]
19%|#9 | 19/100 [00:02<00:10, 8.00it/s]
20%|## | 20/100 [00:02<00:09, 8.00it/s]
21%|##1 | 21/100 [00:02<00:09, 8.00it/s]
22%|##2 | 22/100 [00:02<00:09, 8.00it/s]
23%|##3 | 23/100 [00:02<00:09, 8.00it/s]
24%|##4 | 24/100 [00:02<00:09, 8.00it/s]
25%|##5 | 25/100 [00:03<00:09, 8.00it/s]
26%|##6 | 26/100 [00:03<00:09, 8.00it/s]
27%|##7 | 27/100 [00:03<00:09, 8.09it/s]
28%|##8 | 28/100 [00:03<00:09, 7.77it/s]
29%|##9 | 29/100 [00:03<00:09, 7.84it/s]
30%|### | 30/100 [00:03<00:08, 7.89it/s]
31%|###1 | 31/100 [00:03<00:08, 7.92it/s]
32%|###2 | 32/100 [00:03<00:08, 7.94it/s]
33%|###3 | 33/100 [00:04<00:08, 7.96it/s]
34%|###4 | 34/100 [00:04<00:08, 7.97it/s]
35%|###5 | 35/100 [00:04<00:08, 7.98it/s]
36%|###6 | 36/100 [00:04<00:08, 7.99it/s]
37%|###7 | 37/100 [00:04<00:07, 7.99it/s]
38%|###8 | 38/100 [00:04<00:07, 7.99it/s]
39%|###9 | 39/100 [00:04<00:07, 8.00it/s]
40%|#### | 40/100 [00:04<00:07, 8.00it/s]
41%|####1 | 41/100 [00:05<00:07, 8.00it/s]
如果我像
那样创建自己的进度条,我也会得到相同的结果import sys
def progress_bar_cmd(count,total,suffix="",*,bar_len=60,file=sys.stdout):
filled_len = round(bar_len*count/total)
percents = round(100*count/total,2)
bar = "#"*filled_len + "-"*(bar_len - filled_len)
file.write( "[%s] %s%s ...%s\r"%(bar,percents,"%",suffix))
file.flush()
for i in range(101):
time.sleep(1)
progress_bar_cmd(i,100,"range 100")
为什么会这样?
并且有办法解决它???
答案 0 :(得分:2)
将自己限制为ascii字符,第二个代码的程序输出在两种情况下都是相同的 - 表示ascii字符的ascii字节流。语言定义不能也不能指定输出设备或显示程序对字节的作用,特别是控制字符如'\ r'。
Windows命令提示符控制台至少有时会将'\ r'解释为'将光标返回到当前行的开头而不删除任何内容'。 在Win10控制台中:
>>> import sys; out=sys.stdout
>>> out.write('abc\rdef')
def7
但是,当我运行你的第二个代码时,添加了缺少的时间导入,我没有看到覆盖行为,但是看到与IDLE一样的连续行输出。
C:\Users\Terry>python f:/python/mypy/tem.py
[------------------------------------------------------------] 0.0% ...range 100[#-----------------------------------------------------------] ...
第三方面,如果缩短写入file.write("[%s]\r"% bar)
,那么我确实看到一个输出被覆盖一遍又一遍。
IDLE使用的tk Text小部件仅解释\ t和\ n,但不解释其他控制字符。对于我们中的一些人来说,这似乎适用于开发环境,在这种情况下,擦除字符不如生产环境中那么合适。