我正在尝试在Python中编写一个函数,该函数查找排序列表中的第一个数字,该数字大于我作为参数传递的特定值。我在网上找到了使用简单列表推导来实现这一目的的例子,但出于我的目的,我需要频繁地在大型列表上执行此操作,因此以线性时间运行的搜索过于昂贵。
我在编写类似迭代二进制搜索的函数方面遇到了麻烦,但我遇到了一些无法正常工作的边缘情况。顺便说一下,该功能不需要处理列表中没有较大项目的情况。这是我现有的功能:
def findFirstLarger(num, sortedList):
low = 0;
high = len(sortedList) - 1
mid = -1
while True:
print("low: " + str(low) + "\t high: " + str(high))
if (low > high):
print("Ah geez, low is " + str(low) + " and high is " + str(high))
return # debugging, don't want this to happen
if low == high:
return sortedList[low]
else:
mid = (low + high) / 2;
if num == sortedList[mid]:
return sortedList[mid]
elif num > sortedList[mid]:
low = mid + 1
else:
high = mid - 1
我已经注意到这个功能不起作用的一个案例如下:
>>> somenumbers=[n*2 for n in range(131072)]
>>> somenumbers[-5:]
[262134, 262136, 262138, 262140, 262142]
>>> binsearch.findFirstLarger(262139,somenumbers)
low: 0 high: 131071
low: 65536 high: 131071
low: 98304 high: 131071
low: 114688 high: 131071
low: 122880 high: 131071
low: 126976 high: 131071
low: 129024 high: 131071
low: 130048 high: 131071
low: 130560 high: 131071
low: 130816 high: 131071
low: 130944 high: 131071
low: 131008 high: 131071
low: 131040 high: 131071
low: 131056 high: 131071
low: 131064 high: 131071
low: 131068 high: 131071
low: 131070 high: 131071
low: 131070 high: 131069
Ah geez, low is 131070 and high is 131069
此处正确的结果为262140
,因为这是列表中第一个大于262139
的数字。
任何人都可以推荐更实用的清洁实现吗?我不认为这会是一个如此深奥的问题,尽管到目前为止我还没有找到任何解决方案。
答案 0 :(得分:18)
您是否尝试过bisect
module?
def find_ge(a, key):
'''Find smallest item greater-than or equal to key.
Raise ValueError if no such item exists.
If multiple keys are equal, return the leftmost.
'''
i = bisect_left(a, key)
if i == len(a):
raise ValueError('No item found with key at or above: %r' % (key,))
return a[i]
find_ge(somenumbers, 262139)
您的代码错误,(1)low > high
是有效的终止案例。 (2)你不应该停留在low == high
,例如在num == 3
{/ 1}} somenumbers
时,它会返回错误的索引
答案 1 :(得分:0)
如果您需要没有bisect函数的实现,可以尝试以下代码:
def findFirstLargerOrEqual(num, sortedList):
'''Finds the smallest index in the sortedList
of the element which is greater-than or equal to num'''
slen = len(sortedList)
start = 0
while slen > 0:
m = start + slen//2
if sortedList[m] < num:
slen = slen - (m+1 - start)
start = m+1
continue
if start < m and sortedList[m-1] >= num:
slen = m - start
continue
return somenumbers[m]
raise ValueError('Not found')
somenumbers=[n*2 for n in range(131072)]
print(findFirstLargerOrEqual(262139, somenumbers)) #output: 262140