这是一个模拟针对由较新版本编写的搁置数据库运行较旧版本的Python程序的场景。理想情况下,仍然会解析和读入User对象; favouritePet属性将被忽略。可以理解的是,它会引发错误,抱怨元组不匹配。
是否有一种很好的方法可以使这个场景与namedtuples一起使用,或者如果需要这种灵活性,可以更好地切换到存储字典或类?
import shelve
from collections import namedtuple
shelf = shelve.open("objectshelf", flag='n')
User = namedtuple("User", ("username", "password", "firstname", "surname", "favouritePet"))
shelf["namedtupleAndrew"] = User("andrew@example.com", "mypassword", "Andrew", "Smith", "cat")
# Redefine User to simulate a previous version of the User object that didn't record favouritePet;
# someone using an old version of the program against a database written to by a new version
User = namedtuple("User", ("username", "password", "firstname", "surname"))
# Throws error "takes 5 positional arguments but 6 were given"
namedTupleRead = shelf["namedtupleAndrew"]
print(namedTupleRead.username)
修改:为了完整起见,使用类的想法是相同的:
import shelve
shelf = shelve.open("objectshelf", flag='n')
class User:
def __init__(self, username, password, firstname, surname, favouritePet):
self.username = username
self.password = password
self.firstname = firstname
self.surname = surname
self.favouritePet = favouritePet
shelf["objectAndrew"] = User("andrew@example.com", "mypassword", "Andrew", "Smith", "cat")
# Redefine User to simulate a previous version of the User object that didn't record favouritePet;
# someone using an old version of the program against a database written to by a new version
class User:
def __init__(self, username, password, firstname, surname):
self.username = username
self.password = password
self.firstname = firstname
self.surname = surname
objectRead = shelf["objectAndrew"]
print(objectRead.username)
# favouritePet is still there; it's just a dictionary, after all.
print(objectRead.favouritePet)
答案 0 :(得分:2)
我建议使用字典或自定义类。
一个命名元组需要与字段一样多的参数,所以要直接使用命名元组,你必须更改类__new__
方法以使用*args
和{ {1}}而不是固定的参数列表。如果您查看**kwargs
类的定义(通过添加User
参数),您将看到如何定义类:
verbose=True
...
class User(tuple):
'User(username, password, firstname, surname, favouritePet)'
__slots__ = ()
_fields = ('username', 'password', 'firstname', 'surname', 'favouritePet')
def __new__(_cls, username, password, firstname, surname, favouritePet):
'Create new instance of User(username, password, firstname, surname, favouritePet)'
return _tuple.__new__(_cls, (username, password, firstname, surname, favouritePet))
...
必须成为__new__
,然后正确解析__new__(_cls, *args, **kwargs)
和args
(您仍然希望能够使用kwargs
作为User('a', 'b', 'c', ...)
以及User('a', password='b', firstname='c', ...)
但不User('a', username='A', ...)
与namedtuple保持一致),然后将结果序列与tuple.__new__
一起使用。使用专用类可能更好,而不是以这种方式修改namedtuple的行为。
通过使用自定义构造函数,使用__reduce__
协议(或copyreg.pickle()
)更改User
namedtuple的方式会更容易,例如:
from collections import namedtuple
import shelve
import copyreg
shelf = shelve.open("test")
User = namedtuple("User", ("username", "password", "firstname", "surname", "favouritePet"))
User.__reduce__ = lambda user: (construct_user, tuple(user))
# or: copyreg.pickle(User, lambda user: (construct_user, tuple(user)))
def construct_user(*args):
print('creating new user:', args) # for debugging
return User(*args[:len(User._fields)])
user = User("andrew@example.com", "mypassword", "Andrew", "Smith", "cat")
print(user)
shelf["namedtupleAndrew"] = user
# redefine User
User = namedtuple("User", ("username", "password", "firstname", "surname"))
print(shelf["namedtupleAndrew"])
只要construct_user
函数在所有兼容版本中都可用,这将有效,但如前所述,我仍然建议使用不同的数据结构。