假设我有一个谓语:
declare function local:should-send-email($email-address) {
... fn:true() ...
... fn:false() ...
};
然后我有一个用于xdmp:email
的电子邮件元素:
<em:Message
xmlns:em="URN:ietf:params:email-xml:"
xmlns:rf="URN:ietf:params:rfc822:">
<rf:subject>Test</rf:subject>
<rf:from>
<em:Address>
<em:name>Test Name</em:name>
<em:adrs>test-from@test000.com</em:adrs>
</em:Address>
</rf:from>
<rf:to>
<em:Address>
<em:name>Test Name</em:name>
<em:adrs>test-to-1@test000.com</em:adrs>
</em:Address>
<em:Address>
<em:name>Test Name</em:name>
<em:adrs>test-to-2@test000.com</em:adrs>
</em:Address>
</rf:to>
<em:content>Hello World</em:content>
</em:Message>
让我们说其中一个to地址传递谓词而另一个不传递谓词。删除em的有效方法是什么:未通过的地址元素?
答案 0 :(得分:3)
假设您打算从完整的<em:Message>
元素开始,您可以使用递归类型切换来过滤掉无效的电子邮件地址 - 逻辑与XSLT非常相似:
declare function local:filter-addresses(
$node as node()
) as item()*
{
typeswitch ($node)
case element(em:Address) return
if (not(local:should-send-email($node/em:adrs)))
then () (: Filter :)
else $node
case element() return (: Passthrough :)
element { node-name($node) } {
$node/@*,
for $child in $node/node()
return local:filter-addresses($child)
}
default return $node
};