全部好,
我试图重载new并删除以修复项目中的内存泄漏问题。但是遇到了一些编译错误。
目前这段代码有点破旧
这是我的hdr文件
#include <cstddef>
#include <iostream>
#include <list>
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <stdio.h>
using namespace std;
typedef unsigned int DWORD;
void AddTrack(DWORD addr, DWORD asize, const char *fname, DWORD lnum);
char *OutputDebugString (const char *fmt, ...);
void RemoveTrack(DWORD addr);
void DumpUnfreed();
#ifdef _DEBUG
#define DEBUG_NEW new(__FILE__, __LINE__)
#define new DEBUG_NEW
void * operator new (unsigned int size, const char *file, int line)
{
void *ptr = (void *)malloc(size);
AddTrack((DWORD)ptr, size, file, line);
return(ptr);
}
/*inline void * operator new(unsigned int size)
{
void *ptr = (void *)malloc(size);
AddTrack((DWORD)ptr, size, _FILE_,_LINE_);
return(ptr);
}*/
void operator delete(void *p)
{
RemoveTrack((DWORD)p);
free(p);
}
#endif
char *OutputDebugString (const char *fmt, ...)
{
char *p = NULL;
size_t size = 1024;
int n = 0;
va_list ap;
if((p = (char*) malloc(size)) == NULL)
return NULL;
while(1) {
va_start(ap, fmt);
n = vsnprintf(p, size, fmt, ap);
va_end(ap);
if(n > -1 && n < size)
return p;
/* failed: have to try again, alloc more mem. */
if(n > -1) /* glibc 2.1 */
size = n + 1;
else /* glibc 2.0 */
size *= 2; /* twice the old size */
if((p = (char *)realloc (p, size)) == NULL)
return NULL;
}
}
typedef struct information {
DWORD address;
DWORD size;
char file[64];
DWORD line;
} ALLOC_INFO;
typedef list < ALLOC_INFO* > AllocList;
AllocList *allocList;
void AddTrack(DWORD addr, DWORD asize, const char *fname, DWORD lnum)
{
ALLOC_INFO *info;
if(!allocList) {
//allocList = new AllocList;
allocList = (AllocList*)malloc (sizeof (AllocList));
}
//info = new(ALLOC_INFO);
info = (ALLOC_INFO*) malloc (sizeof (ALLOC_INFO));
info->address = addr;
strncpy(info->file, fname, 63);
info->line = lnum;
info->size = asize;
allocList->insert(allocList->begin(), info);
}
void RemoveTrack(DWORD addr)
{
AllocList::iterator i;
if(!allocList)
if(!allocList)
return;
for(i = allocList->begin(); i != allocList->end(); i++)
{
if((*i)->address == addr)
{
allocList->remove((*i));
break;
}
}
}
void DumpUnfreed()
{
AllocList::iterator i;
DWORD totalSize = 0;
char buf[1024];
if(!allocList)
return;
for(i = allocList->begin(); i != allocList->end(); i++) {
sprintf(buf, "%-50s:\t\tLINE %d,\t\tADDRESS %d\t%d unfreed\n",
(*i)->file, (*i)->line, (*i)->address, (*i)->size);
OutputDebugString("%s",buf);
totalSize += (*i)->size;
}
sprintf(buf, "-----------------------------------------------------------\n");
OutputDebugString("%s",buf);
sprintf(buf, "Total Unfreed: %d bytes\n", totalSize);
OutputDebugString("%s",buf);
}
我的main.cpp是
#include "mynew.h"
int main()
{
char *ptr = new char;
DumpUnfreed();
return 0;
}
当我尝试编译时,我收到以下错误
[root@dhcppc0 new]# !g
g++ main.cpp -D_DEBUG
mynew.h:25: error: declaration of ‘operator new’ as non-function
main.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
main.cpp:9: error: no matching function for call to ‘operator new(unsigned int, const char [9], int)’
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../include/c++/4.1.1/new:84: note: candidates are: void* operator new(size_t)
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../include/c++/4.1.1/new:88: note: void* operator new(size_t, const std::nothrow_t&)
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../include/c++/4.1.1/new:94: note: void* operator new(size_t, void*)
我知道我的#defines有些问题,但我不确定是什么问题。
任何人都可以把我从这个打包出来
答案 0 :(得分:7)
您已在功能之前定义了new
宏。您的代码最终看起来像:
void *
operator new(__FILE__, __LINE__)(unsigned int size, const char *file, int line)
这显然是错误的。你应该在函数下面移动宏定义(或者更好的是将这些函数保存在你链接的.cpp文件中。)对于它的价值,new
是一个关键字,不能是一个标识符,所以你的程序是严格来说,形成不良。
我最近发布了global memory operators framework。它可能对你有所帮助。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
签名不匹配应该是void* operator new (size_t size)
。
覆盖单个对象的新签名是
static void * operator new(site_t size)
,
罗尼