我正在学习逆变,并尝试以下方法来吸收这个概念:
interface B<T>
{
T h();
}
public class SomeOtherClass<T> : B<T>
{
public T h()
{
return default(T);
}
}
public class Trial
{
static void Main()
{
SomeOtherClass<Derived> h = new SomeOtherClass<Derived>();
Base b = h.h();
}
}
我原以为这个代码会在最后一个语句中出错,并认为让T逆变器会修复它。但是,这样可以正常工作。让我想知道逆变在哪里找到了适用性?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
Generics varriance用于接口和delgates
将您的代码更改为以下内容,您将开始收到错误
public class Trial
{
static void Main()
{
B<Derived> h = new SomeOtherClass<Derived>();
B<Base> b = h; // you will get compilation error until you add out keyword in interface B
}
}
这里(Contravariant)关键字是告诉编译器B的实例被认为是安全的方式b
答案 1 :(得分:0)
using System;
using static System.Console;
////
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
interface iContravariance<in T>
{
void Info(T t);
}
class Master<T> : iContravariance<T>
{
public void Info(T insT)
{
if (insT is Parent) {
WriteLine("--- As Parent: ---");
WriteLine((insT as Parent).Method());
}
if (insT is Child) {
WriteLine("--- As Child: ---") ;
WriteLine((insT as Child).Method());
}
}
}
class Parent {
public virtual String Method()
{
WriteLine("Parent Method()");
return "";
}
}
class Child : Parent {
public override String Method()
{
WriteLine("Child Method()");
return "";
}
}
class Client
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Child child = new Child();
Parent parent = new Parent();
iContravariance<Parent> interP = new Master<Parent>();
iContravariance<Child> interC = interP;
interC.Info(child);
//interC.Info(parent); (It is compilation error.)
ReadKey();
return;
}
}
}
输出:
--- As Parent: ---
Child Method()
--- As Child: ---
Child Method()