所以我有以下两个类:
template < class Cost >
class Transformation {
public:
virtual Cost getCost() = 0;
};
template < class TransfCl, class Cost >
class State {
protected:
State(){
static_assert(
std::is_base_of< Transformation< Cost >, TransfCl >::value,
"TransfCl class in State must be derived from Transformation< Cost >"
);
}
public:
virtual void apply( const TransfCl& ) = 0;
};
但是,我希望能够将Cost
模板参数放到State
,因为State
的功能完全独立于Cost
。这样,我可以使用类似于此的语法创建非抽象类:
class TransfImpl : public Transformation< int >{
public: int getCost(){ return 0; }
};
class StateImpl : public State< TransfImpl >{
public:
StateImpl(){
static_assert(
std::is_base_of< Transformation, TransfImpl >::value,
"TransfImpl must inherit from Transformation< Cost >"
);
}
void apply( const TransfImpl & ){}
};
我还希望最终将此链接到第三个类,它将使用State
派生类作为其模板参数,但不需要Transformation
- 派生和{ {1}} - 在其模板参数中派生类,以验证其Cost
派生的模板参数类实际上是否来自State
答案 0 :(得分:1)
这是否符合您的需求?
template < class Cost >
class Transformation {
public:
typedef Cost TransformationCost;
virtual Cost getCost() = 0;
};
template < class TransfCl, class Cost = typename TransfCl::TransformationCost>
class State {
static_assert(
std::is_base_of< Transformation< Cost >, TransfCl >::value,
"TransfCl class in State must be derived from Transformation< Cost >"
);
protected:
State(){}
public:
virtual void apply( const TransfCl& ) = 0;
};
class TransfImpl : public Transformation< int >{
public:
int getCost(){ return 0; }
};
class StateImpl : public State< TransfImpl >{
public:
StateImpl(){}
void apply( const TransfImpl & ){}
};
已添加:Live Demo
答案 1 :(得分:1)
使用
template <template <typename...> class C, typename...Ts>
std::true_type is_template_base_of_impl(const C<Ts...>*);
template <template <typename...> class C>
std::false_type is_template_base_of_impl(...);
template <template <typename...> class C, typename T>
using is_template_base_of = decltype(is_template_base_of_impl<C>(std::declval<T*>()));
你可以做
template <class TransfCl>
class State {
protected:
static_assert(is_template_base_of<Transformation, TransfCl>::value,
"TransfCl class in State must be derived from Transformation<Cost>");
// previous code ...
};