我有一个核心数据模型,包含两个实体,'Parent'和'Child'。 父母与孩子有多对多的关系,孩子与父母有一对一的关系。 我希望在设置父级之后阻止更改子级中的父关系。但是,应该允许删除孩子。
孩子的setParent看起来像这样:
- (void)setParent:(Parent *)parent {
if (self.parent) return;
[self willChangeValueForKey:@"parent"];
[self setPrimitiveValue:parent forKey:@"parent"];
[self didChangeValueForKey:@"parent"];
}
现在,这可以防止父项一旦设置就更改,但同时也会阻止删除子项,因为在删除过程中会重新访问setParent两次以将父项设置为nil。
第一次在删除期间调用setParent,self.isDeleted为true。所以我可以对这种情况做出反应。但是在删除期间再次调用setParent,这次self.isDeleted为false,我不知道如何知道是否有人试图编辑父关系或者是否正在进行删除。
我正在使用MagicalRecord 2.30,删除调用如下所示:
[MagicalRecord saveWithBlockAndWait:^(NSManagedObjectContext *localContext) {
[sut MR_inContext:localContext];
[sut MR_deleteEntityInContext:localContext];
}];
我一直在寻找有关删除期间这些setter调用的一些信息,但没有运气。 所以任何帮助都会受到赞赏。
修改 我把一些NSLog放到我的代码中,文件正在发生。删除实际上适用于此代码,但我不知道所有这些调用是关于什么的。以下是相关代码:
- (BOOL) MR_deleteEntityInContext:(NSManagedObjectContext *)context {
NSLog(@"|");
NSLog(@"|");
NSLog(@"----------------------------------");
NSLog(@"| ***** starting delete... ***** |");
NSLog(@"----------------------------------");
NSLog(@"|");
NSLog(@"|");
return [super MR_deleteEntityInContext:context];
}
- (void)setParent:(Parent *)parent {
NSLog(@"|");
NSLog(@"--------------------------------------------------------------------------");
NSLog(@"setParent has been called with parameter <%p>", parent);
NSLog(@" self.parent is: %p", self.parent);
NSLog(@"self.isDeleted is: %hhd", self.isDeleted);
NSLog(@" self.moc: %@", self.managedObjectContext);
NSLog(@"--------------------------------------------------------------------------");
NSLog(@"|");
if (!self.isDeleted && self.parent) return;
[self willChangeValueForKey:@"parent"];
[self setPrimitiveValue:parent forKey:@"parent"];
[self didChangeValueForKey:@"parent"];
}
它产生以下输出:
----------------------------------
| ***** starting delete... ***** |
----------------------------------
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
setParent has been called with parameter <0x0>
self.parent is: 0x6080000a9cc0
self.isDeleted is: 1
self.moc: <NSManagedObjectContext: 0x6000001c05a0>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
setParent has been called with parameter <0x0>
self.parent is: 0x6080000aa080
self.isDeleted is: 0
self.moc: <NSManagedObjectContext: 0x6080001c0a50>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
setParent has been called with parameter <0x0>
self.parent is: 0x6080000aa080
self.isDeleted is: 1
self.moc: <NSManagedObjectContext: 0x6080001c0a50>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
答案 0 :(得分:0)
根据@Avi的建议,// JavaScript does not have an Array for range constructor.
//
function range( start, count ) { // (Int,Int) -> Array of Int
var arr = [];
for (var i=0; i<count; i++ ) {
arr[i]= start+i;
}
return arr;
}
return Rx.Observable
.range(0,ev.changedTouches.length) // (start, count)
.select( function (i) {
return touchDragObs( ev, i );
});
为parent
时,您可以将nil
设置为isDeleted
。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
这是我发现的。我已经改变了上面的代码,也记录了反向关系。
- (void)setParent:(Parent *)parent {
NSLog(@" ");
NSLog(@"--------------------------------------------------------------------------");
NSLog(@"| setParent has been called with parameter <%p>", parent);
NSLog(@"| self is: %p", self);
NSLog(@"| self.parent is: %p", self.parent);
NSLog(@"| parent.children contains: %p", [Parent MR_findFirstInContext:self.managedObjectContext].children.allObjects.firstObject);
NSLog(@"| self.isDeleted is: %hhd", self.isDeleted);
NSLog(@" ");
if (!self.isDeleted && self.parent) return;
if (self.isDeleted) [self setPrimitiveValue:nil forKey:@"parent"];
[self willChangeValueForKey:@"parent"];
[self setPrimitiveValue:parent forKey:@"parent"];
[self didChangeValueForKey:@"parent"];
NSLog(@"|- after setting the parent ...");
NSLog(@"|- self is: %p", self);
NSLog(@"|- self.parent is: %p", self.parent);
NSLog(@"|- parent.children contains: %p", [Parent MR_findFirstInContext:self.managedObjectContext].children.allObjects.firstObject);
NSLog(@"--------------------------------------------------------------------------");
}
当我删除孩子时,会记录以下内容:
----------------------------------
| ***** starting delete... ***** |
----------------------------------
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| setParent has been called with parameter <0x0>
| self is: 0x6000000a79e0
| self.parent is: 0x6000000a7a40
| parent.children contains: 0x6000000a79e0
| self.isDeleted is: 1
|- after setting the parent ...
|- self is: 0x6000000a79e0
|- self.parent is: 0x0
|- parent.children contains: 0x6000000a79e0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| setParent has been called with parameter <0x0>
| self is: 0x6080000a8100
| self.parent is: 0x6080000a8160
| parent.children contains: 0x0
| self.isDeleted is: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| setParent has been called with parameter <0x0>
| self is: 0x6080000a8100
| self.parent is: 0x6080000a8160
| parent.children contains: 0x0
| self.isDeleted is: 1
|- after setting the parent ...
|- self is: 0x6080000a8100
|- self.parent is: 0x0
|- parent.children contains: 0x0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
因此,在删除期间第一次和第三次调用setter时,isDeleted
为真。但是在第二次调用setter isDeleted
时是错误的。
如果我此时测试反向关系,我发现它已经被删除了。那个测试对我来说已经足够了。它允许删除周期通过,同时如果根本没有设置关系,则允许运行setter。