以下是我的类型......
unit unitTestInterfaces;
interface
type
IFoo = interface
['{169AF568-4568-429A-A8F6-C69F4BBCC6F0}']
function TestFoo1:string;
function TestFoo:string;
end;
IBah = interface
['{C03E4E20-2D13-45E5-BBC6-9FDE12116F95}']
function TestBah:string;
function TestBah1:string;
end;
TFooBah = class(TInterfacedObject, IFoo, IBah)
//IFoo
function TestFoo1:string;
function TestFoo:string;
//IBah
function TestBah1:string;
function TestBah:string;
end;
implementation
{ TFooBah }
function TFooBah.TestBah: string;
begin
Result := 'TestBah';
end;
function TFooBah.TestBah1: string;
begin
Result := 'TestBah1';
end;
function TFooBah.TestFoo: string;
begin
Result := 'TestFoo';
end;
function TFooBah.TestFoo1: string;
begin
Result := 'TestFoo1';
end;
end.
这是我运行示例的代码......
var
fb:TFooBah;
f:IFoo;
b:IBah;
begin
try
fb := TFooBah.Create;
/// Notice we've used IBah here instead of IFoo, our writeln() still outputs the
/// result from the TestBah() function, presumably because it's the "first" method
/// in the IBah interface, just as TestFoo1() is the "first" method in the IFoo
/// interface.
(fb as IUnknown).QueryInterface(IBah,f); //So why bother with this way at all??
//f := fb as IBah; //causes compile error
//f := fb; //works as expected
if Assigned(f)then
begin
writeln(f.TestFoo1); //wouldn't expect this to work since "f" holds reference to IBah, which doesn't have TestFoo1()
end;
(fb as IUnknown).QueryInterface(IBah,b);
if Assigned(f) then
begin
writeln(b.TestBah1);
end;
except on E:Exception do
writeln(E.Message);
end;
end.
似乎在第一次调用QueryInterface时,即使我们将错误类型的接口分配给“f”变量,它仍然会尝试执行它所指向的任何“第一”方法,而不是名为“TestFoo1”的方法。使用f:= fb按预期工作,所以有理由我们使用QueryInterface而不是语法f:= fb?
答案 0 :(得分:7)
我猜你违反了规则:
QueryInterface会将接口放入您请求的f中。你有责任f是适当的类型。由于第二个参数是无类型的,编译器无法警告您有关您的错误。
答案 1 :(得分:3)
我认为更好的语法既不是QueryInterface
也不是f := fb
。这是你评论过的那个:
f := fb as IBah; //causes compile error
这正是因为它有类型检查,它覆盖了QueryInterface
的问题,它不检查它的参数。
答案 2 :(得分:2)
请注意f:= Fb作为IFoo,调用Supports(Fb,IFoo)等tec都在后台调用QueryInterface。所以使用了QueryInterface方法,但是你可以通过autocasting,is,as和方法来获得很好的语法。