我在Unix环境中运行Python 2.7(在Ubuntu和OSX上测试)
我有以下程序:
使用os.open():
[脚本1]
import os
pipe_1_name = "pipe_1"
pipe_2_name = "pipe_2"
pipe_3_name = "pipe_3"
def set_connection():
pipe_names = [pipe_1_name, pipe_2_name, pipe_3_name]
for pipe_name in pipe_names:
if os.path.exists(pipe_name):
os.remove(pipe_name)
os.mkfifo(pipe_name)
else:
os.mkfifo(pipe_name)
pipe_1 = os.open(pipe_1_name, os.O_WRONLY)
os.write(pipe_1, "server_message_0\n")
pipe_2 = open(pipe_2_name, 'r')
received = pipe_2.readline()[:-1]
print "[0] Now processing if received is correct: " + received
pipe_3 = open(pipe_3_name, 'r')
received = pipe_3.readline()[:-1]
print "[1] Now processing if received is correct: " + received
print "Connection established."
return pipe_1,pipe_2,pipe_3
def main():
pipe_1, pipe_2, pipe_3 = set_connection()
print str(pipe_1)
print str(pipe_2)
print str(pipe_3)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
[脚本2]
import os
pipe_1_name = "pipe_1"
pipe_2_name = "pipe_2"
pipe_3_name = "pipe_3"
def get_connection():
pipe_names = [pipe_1_name, pipe_2_name, pipe_3_name]
for pipe_name in pipe_names:
if not os.path.exists(pipe_name):
raise Exception("Pipe "+pipe_name+" does not exist!")
pipe_1 = open(pipe_1_name, 'r')
received = pipe_1.readline()[:-1]
print "[0] Now processing if received is correct: " + received
pipe_2 = os.open(pipe_2_name, os.O_WRONLY)
os.write(pipe_2, "client_message_0\n")
pipe_3 = os.open(pipe_3_name, os.O_WRONLY)
os.write(pipe_3, "client_message_1\n")
print "Connection established."
return pipe_1,pipe_2,pipe_3
def main():
pipe_1, pipe_2, pipe_3 = get_connection()
print str(pipe_1)
print str(pipe_2)
print str(pipe_3)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
逻辑很简单:
[管1] 1.脚本1打开脚本2的写入管道。 2.脚本2从管道中读取。 [管2] 3.脚本2打开脚本1的写入管道。 脚本1从管道中读取。 [管3] 5.脚本2打开脚本1的写入管道。 6.脚本1从管道中读取。
完全符合预期。
这是问题所在。我不想使用os.open()。我希望接收一个文件对象并使用它来与管道接口。显然,这并非不可能,因为我可以从带有文件对象的管道中读取。但是,以下脚本不起作用。
没有os.open()
[脚本1]
import os
pipe_1_name = "pipe_1"
pipe_2_name = "pipe_2"
pipe_3_name = "pipe_3"
def set_connection():
pipe_names = [pipe_1_name, pipe_2_name, pipe_3_name]
for pipe_name in pipe_names:
if os.path.exists(pipe_name):
os.remove(pipe_name)
os.mkfifo(pipe_name)
else:
os.mkfifo(pipe_name)
pipe_1 = open(pipe_1_name, 'w')
pipe_1.write("server_message_0\n")
pipe_2 = open(pipe_2_name, 'r')
received = pipe_2.readline()[:-1]
print "[0] Now processing if received is correct: " + received
pipe_3 = open(pipe_3_name, 'r')
received = pipe_3.readline()[:-1]
print "[1] Now processing if received is correct: " + received
print "Connection established."
return pipe_1,pipe_2,pipe_3
def main():
pipe_1, pipe_2, pipe_3 = set_connection()
print str(pipe_1)
print str(pipe_2)
print str(pipe_3)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
[脚本2]
import os
pipe_1_name = "pipe_1"
pipe_2_name = "pipe_2"
pipe_3_name = "pipe_3"
def get_connection():
pipe_names = [pipe_1_name, pipe_2_name, pipe_3_name]
for pipe_name in pipe_names:
if not os.path.exists(pipe_name):
raise Exception("Pipe "+pipe_name+" does not exist!")
pipe_1 = open(pipe_1_name, 'r')
received = pipe_1.readline()[:-1]
print "[0] Now processing if received is correct: " + received
pipe_2 = open(pipe_2_name, 'w')
pipe_2.write("client_message_0\n")
pipe_3 = open(pipe_3_name, 'w')
pipe_3.write("client_message_1\n")
print "Connection established."
return pipe_1,pipe_2,pipe_3
def main():
pipe_1, pipe_2, pipe_3 = get_connection()
print str(pipe_1)
print str(pipe_2)
print str(pipe_3)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
他们看起来一样,不是吗?唯一的区别是我如何打开fifo。而不是os.open(pipe_name,os.O_WRONLY)
我使用pipe = open(pipe_name, 'w')
。
第二组脚本中发生了什么,不使用os.open(),脚本1在pipe_2 = open(pipe_2_name, 'r')
阻塞,而脚本2在pipe_2 = open(pipe_2_name, 'w')
阻塞。
为什么会这样?
对不起文字墙。我对这个问题感到很困惑。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
第二组脚本中发生了什么,不使用的脚本 os.open(),脚本1在
07-10 13:08:12.113 D/dalvikvm( 2154): GREF has increased to 2001 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): JNI global reference table (0xb9059ae0) dump: 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): Last 10 entries (of 2001): 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): 2000: 0xab294a58 android.widget.RelativeLayout$LayoutParams 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): 1999: 0xab2949f8 mono.android.view.View_OnClickListenerImplementor 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): 1998: 0xab294828 android.widget.RelativeLayout$LayoutParams 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): 1997: 0xab294458 android.widget.ImageView 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): 1996: 0xab294320 android.widget.RelativeLayout$LayoutParams 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): 1995: 0xab2942c0 mono.android.view.View_OnClickListenerImplementor 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): 1994: 0xab293cc8 android.widget.TextView 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): 1993: 0xab293658 android.widget.RelativeLayout 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): 1992: 0xab290998 android.widget.RelativeLayout$LayoutParams 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): 1991: 0xab290860 android.widget.RelativeLayout$LayoutParams 07-10 13:08:12.113 W/dalvikvm( 2154): Summary:
处阻塞,而脚本2在pipe_2 = open(pipe_2_name, 'r')
处阻塞。
不,脚本2在pipe_2 = open(pipe_2_name, 'w')
处阻止。
为什么会发生这种情况?
这是因为脚本1的received = pipe_1.readline()[:-1]
导致写入的消息以固定大小的块(通常为4096或8192字节)进行缓冲,因此open(pipe_1_name, 'w')
尚未向管道写入任何内容,而只是到缓冲区,脚本2没有任何东西可读。请参阅open()以及How often does python flush to a file?
要解决此问题,由于您的消息是完整的行,因此只需使用行缓冲,e。克。
pipe_1.write("server_message_0\n")
(以及其他写管道)。