我试图用两个约束来实现随机梯度下降,因此不能使用scikit-learn。不幸的是,我已经在没有这两个限制的情况下与常规SGD挣扎。训练集上的损失(平方损失)在一些迭代中下降,但在一段时间后开始增加,如图中所示。 这些是我使用的功能:
def loss_prime_simple(w,node,feature,data):
x = data[3]
y = data[2]
x_f = x[node][feature]
y_node = y[node]
ret = (y_node - w[feature] * x_f) * (-x_f)
return ret
def update_weights(w,data,predecs,children,node, learning_rate):
len_features = len(data[3][0])
w_new = np.zeros(len_features)
for feature_ in range(len_features):
w_new[feature_] = loss_prime_simple(w,node,feature_,data)
return w - learning_rate * w_new
def loss_simple(w,data):
y_p = data[2]
x = data[3]
return ((y_p - np.dot(w,np.array(x).T)) ** 2).sum()
这显示了训练集的损失,具有两种不同的学习率(0.001,0.0001)http://postimg.org/image/43nbmh8x5/
任何人都可以发现错误或有建议如何调试此问题? 感谢
编辑:
正如lejlot指出的那样,拥有数据会很好。 以下是我用于x(单个样本)的数据:http://textuploader.com/5x0f1
Y = 2
这会导致丢失:http://postimg.org/image/o9d97kt9v/
更新的代码:
def loss_prime_simple(w,node,feature,data):
x = data[3]
y = data[2]
x_f = x[node][feature]
y_node = y[node]
return -(y_node - w[feature] * x_f) * x_f
def update_weights(w,data,predecs,children,node, learning_rate):
len_features = len(data[3][0])
w_new = np.zeros(len_features)
for feature_ in range(len_features):
w_new[feature_] = loss_prime_simple(w,node,feature_,data)
return w - learning_rate * w_new
def loss_simple2(w,data):
y_p = data[2]
x = data[3]
return ((y_p - np.dot(w,np.array(x).T)) ** 2).sum()
import numpy as np
X = [#put array from http://textuploader.com/5x0f1 here]
y = [2]
data = None, None, y, X
w = np.random.rand(4096)
a = [ loss_simple2(w, data) ]
for _ in range(200):
for j in range(X.shape[0]):
w = update_weights(w,data,None,None,j, 0.0001)
a.append( loss_simple2(w, data) )
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
plt.figure()
plt.plot(a)
plt.show()
答案 0 :(得分:1)
您可以注意到的主要错误是reshape
而非transpose
,比较:
>>> import numpy as np
>>> X = np.array(range(10)).reshape(2,-1)
>>> X
array([[0, 1, 2, 3, 4],
[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]])
>>> X.reshape(-1, 2)
array([[0, 1],
[2, 3],
[4, 5],
[6, 7],
[8, 9]])
>>> X.T
array([[0, 5],
[1, 6],
[2, 7],
[3, 8],
[4, 9]])
>>> X.reshape(-1, 2) == X.T
array([[ True, False],
[False, False],
[False, False],
[False, False],
[False, True]], dtype=bool)
接下来看起来很糟糕的是调用sum(数组),你应该调用array.sum()
>>> import numpy as np
>>> x = np.array(range(10)).reshape(2, 5)
>>> x
array([[0, 1, 2, 3, 4],
[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]])
>>> sum(x)
array([ 5, 7, 9, 11, 13])
>>> x.sum()
45
在此之后,它运作得很好
def loss_prime_simple(w,node,feature,data):
x = data[3]
y = data[2]
x_f = x[node][feature]
y_node = y[node]
ret = w[feature]
return -(y_node - w[feature] * x_f) * x_f
def update_weights(w,data,predecs,children,node, learning_rate):
len_features = len(data[3][0])
w_new = np.zeros(len_features)
for feature_ in range(len_features):
w_new[feature_] = loss_prime_simple(w,node,feature_,data)
return w - learning_rate * w_new
def loss_simple(w,data):
y_p = data[2]
x = data[3]
return ((y_p - np.dot(w,np.array(x).T)) ** 2).sum()
import numpy as np
X = np.random.randn(1000, 3)
y = np.random.randn(1000)
data = None, None, y, X
w = np.array([1,3,3])
loss = [loss_simple(w, data)]
for _ in range(20):
for j in range(X.shape[0]):
w = update_weights(w, data, None, None, j, 0.001)
loss.append(loss_simple(w, data))
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
plt.figure()
plt.plot(loss)
plt.show()
答案 1 :(得分:1)