生产者/消费者模型使用Java(同步)但始终运行相同的线程

时间:2015-10-18 07:11:09

标签: java multithreading

一切看起来都很好但是当我跑步时,结果如下:

  

开始线程(1):Pro2

     

开始线程(2):Pro1

     

开始线程(1):Con1

     

开始线程(2):Con2

     

Pro2 Produce:EWlmJdi2KK

     

左:

     

Pro2的:EWlmJdi2KK

     

---左:1 ---

     

Con2消耗:EWlmJdi2KK

     

左:

     

---左:0 ---

     

Pro2制作:Nx7QPyG7vs

     

左:

     

Pro2的:Nx7QPyG7vs

     

---左:1 ---

     

Pro2 Produce:xl85Zwr80a

     

左:Pro2:Nx7QPyG7vs   PRO2:xl85Zwr80a

     

---左:2 ---

始终是同一制片人&消费者在运行时间。

这是我的代码: Main.java:

package com.producer;

import org.apache.commons.lang3.RandomStringUtils;

public class Main {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        ThreadSynchronized semaphore = new ThreadSynchronized();
        ThreadSynchronized.Producer pro = semaphore.new Producer("1");
        ThreadSynchronized.Consumer con = semaphore.new Consumer("2");
        new Thread(pro, "Pro2").start();
        new Thread(pro, "Pro1").start();
        new Thread(con, "Con1").start();
        new Thread(con, "Con2").start();

    }
}

ThreadSynchronized.java:

package com.producer;

import java.util.LinkedList;

/**
 * Created by SkyAo on 15/10/18.
 */
public class ThreadSynchronized {
    private static int pid;
    private static int cid;
    public LinkedList<Item> items = new LinkedList<>();
    private Item temp;
    private int item;
    private boolean flag = false;

    class Producer implements Runnable {
        private String name;
        private int id;

        public Producer(String name) {
            this.name = name;
        }

        @Override
        public void run() {
            this.id = ++pid;
            System.out.println("Start Thread(" + this.id + "): " + Thread.currentThread().getName());
            while (true)
                this.produce();
        }

        private synchronized void produce() {
            try {

                Thread.sleep((int)(Math.random()*5000)+3000);
                if (items.size() < 5) {
                    items.add(new Item(this.id, Thread.currentThread().getName()));
                    temp = items.getLast();
                    System.out.println(temp.sourceName + " Produce: " + temp.semi);

                    System.out.println("Left: ");

                    for (Item item : items) {
                        System.out.println(item.sourceName + ":" + item.semi);
                    }

                    System.out.println("---Left: " + items.size() + "---");
                } else {
                    super.wait();
                }
            } catch (Exception e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            } finally {
                super.notifyAll();
            }

        }


    }

    class Consumer implements Runnable {
        private String name;
        private int id;

        public Consumer(String name) {
            this.name = name;
            //this.id = ++cid;
        }

        @Override
        public void run() {
            this.id = ++cid;
            System.out.println("Start Thread(" + this.id + "): " + Thread.currentThread().getName());
            while (true)
                this.consume();

        }

        private synchronized void consume() {
            try {
                Thread.sleep((int) (Math.random() * 5000) + 3000);
                if (items.size() > 0) {
                    temp = items.removeFirst();
                    System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " Consume: " + temp.semi);
                    System.out.println("Left: ");

                    for (Item item : items) {
                        System.out.println(item.sourceName + ":" + item.semi);
                    }

                    System.out.println("---Left: " + items.size() + "---");
                } else {
                    super.wait();
                }
            } catch (Exception e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            } finally {
                super.notifyAll();
            }
        }
    }
}

我不知道发生了什么以及如何解决,谢谢你的帮助。

3 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:1)

使用notify / wait解决生产者/消费者问题很棘手。我的建议是你看看“队列”。更具体地说,是AbstractQueue的一个子类。

您首先要创建一个合适的队列。然后创建Producer对象。每个生成器对象都实现Runnable。创建对象时,将队列作为参数传递。您将生产者对象作为新线程启动。

你对Consumer对象做同样的事情。它们还实现Runnable并在创建时作为参数传递队列。当所有Producer和Consumer线程都在运行时,您的主程序就完成了。

它是传递给所有Producer和Consumer线程的相同队列对象。同步由队列处理。

生产者对象中的代码写入队列或将条目放入队列 - 而消费者中的代码从队列中读取或提取条目。

See this blog举个例子。

答案 1 :(得分:1)

您以不寻常的方式构建了解决方案。通常,生产者和消费者本身不是同步的,但是对他们共享的资源的访问是同步的。

考虑这个例子。这里,MyQueue的实例是共享资源 - 它是具有同步方法的东西。生产者和消费者本身不同步。

import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Random;

class MyQueue {
    private int capacity;
    private List<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();

    public MyQueue(int capacity) {
        this.capacity = capacity;
    }

    public synchronized void enqueue(int item) throws InterruptedException {
        while (queue.size() == this.capacity) {
            wait();
        }

        System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread().getName() +
                           " producing " + item);
        queue.add(item);

        if (queue.size() == 1) {
            notifyAll();
        }
    }

    public synchronized int dequeue() throws InterruptedException {
        int item;

        while (queue.size() == 0) {
            wait();
        }

        item = queue.remove(0);

        System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread().getName() +
                           " consuming " + item);

        if (queue.size() == (capacity - 1)) {
            notifyAll();
        }

        return item;
    }
}

public class ProducerConsumer {
    private static class Producer implements Runnable {
        private MyQueue queue;
        private Random random = new Random();

        public Producer(MyQueue queue) {
            this.queue = queue;
        }

        public void run() {
            try {
                for (;;) {
                    queue.enqueue(random.nextInt());
                    Thread.sleep((int)(Math.random() * 3000) + 1000);
                }
            } catch (InterruptedException ex) {
                System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() +
                        " interrupted");
            }
        }
    }

    private static class Consumer implements Runnable {
        private MyQueue queue;

        public Consumer(MyQueue queue) {
            this.queue = queue;
        }

        public void run() {
            try {
                for (;;) {
                    queue.dequeue();
                    Thread.sleep((int)(Math.random() * 5000) + 3000);
                }
            } catch (InterruptedException ex) {
                System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() +
                        " interrupted");
            }
        }
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MyQueue queue = new MyQueue(10);

        new Thread(new Producer(queue), "Producer 1").start();
        new Thread(new Producer(queue), "Producer 2").start();
        new Thread(new Consumer(queue), "Consumer 1").start();
        new Thread(new Consumer(queue), "Consumer 2").start();
    }
}

示例输出:

$ java ProducerConsumer
Thread Producer 1 producing 1380029295
Thread Consumer 1 consuming 1380029295
Thread Producer 2 producing 1449212482
Thread Consumer 2 consuming 1449212482
Thread Producer 2 producing -1845586946
Thread Producer 1 producing -1072820603
Thread Producer 1 producing 1224861300
Thread Producer 2 producing 507431251
Thread Consumer 2 consuming -1845586946
Thread Consumer 1 consuming -1072820603
Thread Producer 2 producing -1305630628
Thread Producer 1 producing 1413011254
Thread Producer 2 producing -222621018
Thread Consumer 2 consuming 1224861300
Thread Producer 1 producing -1628544536
Thread Consumer 1 consuming 507431251

答案 2 :(得分:0)

您正在以Java vanilla方式解决棘手的设计问题。这种方法容易出错且不可靠。我建议改用现成的解决方案。但是,对于您而言,我认为您会发现this article会有所帮助。