Question

我试图理解现代C ++中智能指针的使用，我编写了一个小而简单的程序来在valgrind中进行测试。问题是下面的例子：

#include <iostream>
#include <memory>

class Base {
    private:
        virtual double meth_1( double x ) const = 0;
        virtual void meth_2( int y ) const = 0;
    protected:
        Base()
        {
            std::cout << "ctor of base for: " << this << std::endl;
        }
    public:
        virtual ~Base()
        {
            std::cout << "dtor of base for: " << this << std::endl;
        }
        double IMeth_1( double x ) const
        {
            return meth_1(x);
        }
        void IMeth_2( int y ) const
        {
            meth_2(y);
        }
};

class Derived_1 : public Base {
    private:
        double meth_1( double x ) const final
        {
            return x + 5.0;
        }
        void meth_2( int y ) const final
        {
            std::cout << (y + 5) << std::endl;
        }
    public:
        Derived_1() : Base()
        {
            std::cout << "ctor of Derived_1: " << this << std::endl;
        }
        ~Derived_1()
        {
            std::cout << "dtor of Derived_1: " << this << std::endl;
        }
};

class Derived_2 : public Base {
    private:
        double meth_1( double x ) const final
        {
            return x + 10.0;
        }
        void meth_2( int y ) const final
        {
            std::cout << (y + 10) << std::endl;
        }
    public:
        Derived_2() : Base()
        {
            std::cout << "ctor of Derived_2: " << this << std::endl;
        }
        ~Derived_2()
        {
            std::cout << "dtor of Derived_2: " << this << std::endl;
        }
};

void Fun( const Base& crBase )
{
    crBase.IMeth_2( 5 );
}

int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) {
    std::unique_ptr< Base > upBase;

    for ( std::size_t idx = 0ul; idx < 2ul; idx++ ) {
        upBase      = std::make_unique< Derived_1 >();
        std::cout   << upBase->IMeth_1( idx )   << std::endl;
        upBase->IMeth_2( idx );
        std::cout   << "----------"             << std::endl;
    }

    for ( std::size_t idx = 0ul; idx < 2ul; idx++ ) {
        upBase      = std::make_unique< Derived_2 >();
        std::cout   << upBase->IMeth_1( idx )   << std::endl;
        upBase->IMeth_2( idx );
        std::cout   << "----------"             << std::endl;
    }

    upBase = std::make_unique< Derived_1 >();
    Fun( *upBase );

    return 0;
}

使用valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all <prog_name>：

运行时，

会导致内存泄漏

==32350== HEAP SUMMARY:
==32350==     in use at exit: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
==32350==   total heap usage: 6 allocs, 5 frees, 72,744 bytes allocated
==32350== 
==32350== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1
==32350==    at 0x4C28C10: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==32350==    by 0x4EBE1EF: pool (eh_alloc.cc:117)
==32350==    by 0x4EBE1EF: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 (eh_alloc.cc:244)
==32350==    by 0x4EBE1EF: _GLOBAL__sub_I_eh_alloc.cc (eh_alloc.cc:307)
==32350==    by 0x400F279: call_init.part.0 (in /usr/lib/ld-2.22.so)
==32350==    by 0x400F38A: _dl_init (in /usr/lib/ld-2.22.so)
==32350==    by 0x4000DB9: ??? (in /usr/lib/ld-2.22.so)
==32350== 
==32350== LEAK SUMMARY:
==32350==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==32350==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==32350==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==32350==    still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
==32350==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==32350== 
==32350== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==32350== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)

在退出误报时仍然使用72,704字节的块，还是我误用了智能指针？我假设我没有进行任何切片，因为每次删除对象时都会调用基本的dtor。

很抱歉，如果这是一个愚蠢的问题，但我在SO中找不到任何valgrind / false positive / unique_ptr相关主题。此外，我不知道unique_ptr中可能创建的任何其他块与shared_ptr中的valgrind类似，以跟踪对象。

编辑：不是Still Reachable Leak detected by Valgrind的副本，因为在我的情况下我没有使用线程（并且<Window.Resources> <Style x:Key="ListViewItemStyle1" TargetType="{x:Type ListViewItem}"> <EventSetter Event="ListBoxItem.DragOver" Handler="ListBoxItemDragOver"/> <EventSetter Event="ListBoxItem.Drop" Handler="ListBoxItemDrop"/> <EventSetter Event="ListBoxItem.PreviewMouseMove" Handler="ListBoxItemPreviewMouseMove"/> </Style> </Window.Resources>已知会在特别是OpenMPI环境中出现误报）。而且，在另一个问题中，通过对所提供的代码的适当修改来解决该问题。仍然没有任何关于什么称为真正的内存泄漏的共识 - 也就是说，可到达块 仍然在退出时使用 / em>被视为内存泄漏，或不。

Answer 1

这不是一个valgrind错误。它是libstdc ++特有的功能在http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=219988中引入。

如果查看代码，您将看到来自libstdc ++ - v3 / libsupc ++ / eh_alloc.cc的类池没有析构函数，因为它是一个紧急内存池，旨在在整个运行时期间保留应用

即使是最小的程序也会显示问题：

 ~ % echo "int main () {}" | g++ -x c++ -
 ~ % valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all ./a.out
==502== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==502== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==502== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==502== Command: ./a.out
==502== 
==502== 
==502== HEAP SUMMARY:
==502==     in use at exit: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
==502==   total heap usage: 1 allocs, 0 frees, 72,704 bytes allocated
==502== 
==502== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1
==502==    at 0x402CC6F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
==502==    by 0x40F420F: _GLOBAL__sub_I_eh_alloc.cc (in /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.2.1/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
==502==    by 0x4010AA4: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72)
==502==    by 0x4010D44: call_init (dl-init.c:30)
==502==    by 0x4010D44: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120)
==502==    by 0x4000C79: ??? (in /lib64/ld-2.22.90.so)

valgrind和std :: unique_ptr ---假阳性与否？

1 个答案: