我在Win32下开发了一个简单的工作DLL:它扫描主机的虚拟内存中的子字符串。但由于某些原因,与使用单线程扫描的Cheat Engine,ArtMoney甚至OllyDbg相比,它的速度非常慢。这是我用VirtualQuery()扫描单个内存部分的函数的代码。主机(.exe应用程序)提交大约300-400 MiB的内存,我必须扫描大约170个不同大小的内存部分,从4KiB到32MiB。我只扫描MEM_PRIVATE,MEM_COMMIT区域,不扫描PAGE_GUARD,PAGE_NOACCESS,PAGE_READONLY,跳过DLL自己的内存。
由于某些原因,性能很糟糕 - 找到单个字符串需要10-12秒。例如,OllyDbg在~2-3秒内找到字符串。
UINT __stdcall ScanAndReplace(UCHAR* pStartAddress, UCHAR* pEndAddress, const char* csSearchFor, const char* csReplaceTo, UINT iLength)
{
// This function runs inside the single memory section and looks for a specific substring
// pStartAddress: UCHAR* - The begining of the memory section
// pEndAddress: UCHAR* - The ending of the memory section
// csSearchFor: const char* - The pointer to the substring to search for
// csReplaceTo: const char* - The pointer to the substring to replace with
// iLength: UINT - max length of csSearchFor substring
// Total iterations
UINT iHits = 0;
// Scan from pStartAddress to (pEndAddress - iLength) and don't overrun memory section
for (pStartAddress; pStartAddress < (pEndAddress - iLength); ++pStartAddress)
{
UINT iIterator = 0;
// Scan for specific string that begins at current address (pStartAddress) until condition breaks
for (iIterator; (iIterator < iLength) && (pStartAddress[iIterator] == csSearchFor[iIterator]); ++iIterator);
// String matches if iIterator == iLength
if (iIterator == iLength)
{
// Found, do something (edit/replace, etc), increment counter...
++iHits;
}
/*
// Even if you search for single byte it's very slow
if (*pStartAddress == 'A')
++iHits;
*/
}
return iHits;
}
我正在使用MSVS 2010。
编译器命令行:
/nologo /W3 /WX- /O2 /Os /Oy- /GL /D "WIN32" /D "NDEBUG" /D "_WINDOWS"
/D "_USRDLL" /D "MYDLL_EXPORTS" /D "_WINDLL" /GF /Gm- /MD /GS- /Gy
/fp:precise /Zc:wchar_t /Zc:forScope /Fp"Release\MyDll.pch" /FAcs
/Fa"Release\" /Fo"Release\" /Fd"Release\vc100.pdb" /Gd /TC /analyze-
/errorReport:queue
链接器命令行:
/OUT:"D:\MyDll\Release\MyDll.dll" /INCREMENTAL:NO /NOLOGO /DLL "Dbghelp.lib"
"msvcrt.lib" "kernel32.lib" "user32.lib" "gdi32.lib" "winspool.lib"
"comdlg32.lib" "advapi32.lib" "shell32.lib" "ole32.lib" "oleaut32.lib"
"uuid.lib" "odbc32.lib" "odbccp32.lib" /NODEFAULTLIB /MANIFEST:NO
/ManifestFile:"Release\MyDll.dll.intermediate.manifest" /ALLOWISOLATION
/MANIFESTUAC:"level='asInvoker' uiAccess='false'" /DEBUG
/PDB:"D:\MyDll\Release\MyDll.pdb" /SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS /OPT:REF /OPT:ICF
/PGD:"D:\MyDll\Release\MyDll.pgd" /LTCG /TLBID:1 /ENTRY:"DllMain"
/DYNAMICBASE /NXCOMPAT /MACHINE:X86 /ERRORREPORT:QUEUE
我做错了什么?我的algorythm是坏的还是有某种&#34;魔法&#34;其他内存扫描仪使用?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
其他内存扫描仪可能正在使用&#34; magic&#34;以更好的搜索算法的形式,例如Boyer-Moore。他们也可能会对他们的搜索算法进行额外的微观优化,但我猜测算法的选择会占据你所看到的大部分差异。